Reports
Actions for Road asset management in local government
Road asset management in local government
About this report
Local councils in NSW manage a large proportion of roads across the state. Roads often represent a significant proportion of total council
expenditure.
How councils manage roads is impacted by their revenue, local conditions, and the needs of residents, businesses and other road users.
This audit was undertaken within the wider context of natural disasters and weather events that have significantly impacted the road network in NSW in recent years.
It assessed whether three councils had effectively managed their road assets to meet the needs of their communities, makes detailed findings and recommendations to each audited council, and identifies key lessons for the wider local government sector.
Key findings
All councils can improve how they link community consultation with planned service levels. Formalising these processes could help better demonstrate how current service levels meet community needs.
Clarence Valley Council
- has established a strategic priority for road asset management but not formal governance arrangements or a long-term capital works program
- is delivering and reporting on its work to respond to natural disasters but does not report against targets for road asset quality and service
- has set benchmarks for road asset maintenance, replacement and renewal but needs clear service levels.
Gwydir Shire Council
- did not have aligned, up-to-date asset plans during the audit period
- did not have a long-term capital works program but adopted a prioritisation program for capital works in August 2024
- did not effectively implement formal governance, or coordinate management oversight, to manage its road assets.
Wollondilly Shire Council
- has a strategic framework for road asset management and has used long-term plans to guide its asset capital and maintenance works
- has reported asset management outcomes against a planned capital works program but could improve how it uses KPIs to demonstrate performance.
Key observations of good practiceThis report identifies that effective road asset management is best supported when councils have:
|
This is the first performance audit of the local government sector that I am tabling in Parliament as Auditor-General for New South Wales.
Our performance audits are designed to provide valuable information to parliamentarians, sector stakeholders and the public. Ultimately, our aim is to ensure transparency, a principle that underpins effective and efficient use of public resources.
The management of roads and associated assets is a critical issue for local councils across the state. In recent years, many councils have had to contend with the immediate and ongoing effects of natural disasters.
These natural disasters, along with increased community expectations, population changes and complex regulatory obligations all contribute to financial sustainability risks for councils. Some councils have used short-term funding allocations (including emergency relief grants) to cover the costs of managing long-term assets. These councils do not have the capacity to generate sufficient income from their own sources, and therefore depend on assistance from other levels of government. Councils’ ability to plan and budget for the long term has also been disrupted by the need for new or restored infrastructure outside asset life cycles.
Several reports and inquiries in recent years have highlighted these significant financial sustainability risks. The parliamentary inquiry into the ‘Ability of local governments to fund infrastructure and services’,1 due to be tabled soon, will be a critical input to a long-term solution.
The three councils audited in this report – Clarence Valley, Gwydir Shire and Wollondilly Shire –each experienced significant natural disasters, including fires, storms and floods during the audit period. Despite this, each audited council was able to deliver a large volume of road asset management works.
This report provides valuable lessons from these audited councils that can help all councils manage their roads more effectively in the face of evolving risks and competing resource demands.
I acknowledge this has been a difficult time for some councils across NSW. This report supports councils with practical steps to manage their roads as effectively as possible, improve their resilience to climate challenges and meet legislative requirements.
1 The inquiry into the ‘Ability of local governments to fund infrastructure and services’ by the NSW Legislative Council Standing Committee on State Development commenced on 14 March 2024 to inquire into, and report on, the ability of local governments to fund infrastructure and services.
Background
Local councils in New South Wales (NSW) manage over 180,000 km of local and regional roads combined. These roads are crucial to travel within local government areas and across the state, improving community accessibility. Reliable roads ensure commercial and public transport can run on time, increase safety and keep the environment clean.
As roads age and deteriorate, they become more expensive to repair. Road surfaces and formations are vulnerable to both extreme heat and water exposure. These kinds of exposure have varying effects on the ways roads degrade, depending on the amount of traffic and the kinds of vehicles that use them.
Local conditions, business and road-user needs, and the impacts of natural disasters vary between councils and influence the way each council manages its roads. Regularly maintaining roads can keep roads functional and safe and prevent costly, unbudgeted repairs and replacements.
In the 2022–23 financial year (FY2022–23), the estimated total replacement cost of council road assets across NSW was around $102 billion. In the same year, local councils reported collective road asset maintenance expenditure of around $1 billion.
Since 2017, financial audits of local councils have identified asset management-related issues, including gaps in asset management processes, governance and systems. The Audit Office’s ‘Local Government 2023’ report outlined 266 asset management-related findings across the local government sector, including gaps in revaluation processes, maintenance of information in asset management systems and accounting practices.
Councils also provide a wide range of other services and infrastructure, including water and sewer infrastructure and services, waste management, environmental protection, housing, and community transport. Through integrated planning and reporting, councils determine how they will allocate resources to their services and infrastructure. Understanding community expectations for assets and services, alongside technical requirements, supports effective planning for function, cost and quality.
Audit objective
This audit assessed how effectively three councils – Clarence Valley Council, Gwydir Shire Council and Wollondilly Shire Council – are managing their road assets to meet the needs of their communities.
The audit assessed whether the selected councils:
- have a strategic framework in place for managing their road assets
- have effective governance, data and systems for road asset management
- are managing their road assets in line with planned service levels and quality outcomes.
Overview of findings
This audit assessed how effectively Clarence Valley Council, Gwydir Shire Council and Wollondilly Shire Council managed their road assets to meet the needs of their communities.
In assessing each Council’s performance, this audit concluded:
Clarence Valley Council has effectively established a strategic priority for road asset management, but delivery of this priority was not supported by formal governance arrangements or a long-term capital works program. While the Council is delivering and reporting on a large volume of road asset works in response to natural disasters, it does not report on consolidated targets for road asset quality and service. The Council has set benchmarks for maintenance, replacement and renewal of roads. It now needs to enhance this with clear service levels to ensure community needs and expectations are met.
Detailed conclusions and recommendations for the Council are outlined in sections 2.2 and 2.3. Recommendations include that Clarence Valley Council:
- updates and implements its asset management plan and associated improvement actions
- reviews and implements key performance indicators (KPIs)
- captures lessons learned from its natural disaster responses
- implements a long-term capital works program.
Gwydir Shire Council did not have aligned, up-to-date long-term asset management plans to support a strategic framework for road asset management across the audit period. The Council did not effectively implement formal governance and coordinated management oversight for its road assets. The Council implemented updates to its asset management plans in June 2024 and governance arrangements in July 2024.
The Council has reported on the large volume of works it is delivering, including in response to natural disasters, but is not reporting in the context of information about targets and quality benchmarks. The Council does not have a long-term capital works program, but adopted a prioritised rolling program of works in August 2024 to guide its priorities and efforts over time.
Detailed conclusions and recommendations for the Council are outlined in sections 3.2 and 3.3. Recommendations include that Gwydir Shire Council:
- implements its asset management plans and associated improvement actions
- formalises and documents community priorities and service level expectations for roads
- captures lessons learned from its natural disaster responses.
Wollondilly Shire Council has effectively applied a coordinated and strategic framework to deliver road asset management. The Council has long-term plans to guide its efforts and uses data to inform its approach. The Council has delivered a large volume of works in response to natural disasters during the audit period. The Council is reporting its road asset management outcomes and can demonstrate progress against a clearly defined capital works program, but its use of performance indicators could be improved.
Detailed conclusions and recommendations for the Council are outlined in sections 4.2 and 4.3. Recommendations include that Wollondilly Shire Council:
- finalises and implements its transport asset management plan
- reviews performance indicators for road assets
- formalises and documents community priorities within its integrated planning and reporting (IP&R) and asset management frameworks.
Key observations of good practice
While each council was separately audited, this report also identifies practices that contribute to effective road asset management across all local councils.
These include:
- a good understanding and articulation of the community’s vision, priorities and purpose for local roads
- asset management documents that are current and aligned with broader strategies and financial plans
- long-term capital works planning that considers associated ongoing costs, and is supported by systematic prioritisation of works
- clear and documented decision making processes
- transparent performance reporting on progress and outcomes
- reliable, accurate and assured data and systems
- continuous improvement through both formal reviews and capturing lessons learned
- resilience and responsiveness to natural disasters with a planned approach to disaster recovery.
Further lessons for local government can be found in Appendix 3.
Appendix 1 – Response from entity
Appendix 2 – Council expenditure profile
Appendix 3 – Lessons for local government road asset management
Appendix 5 – Performance auditing
© Copyright reserved by the Audit Office of New South Wales. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without prior consent of the Audit Office of New South Wales. The Audit Office does not accept responsibility for loss or damage suffered by any person acting on or refraining from action as a result of any of this material.
Parliamentary reference - Report number #401 - released 21 November 2024.
Actions for Social housing
Social housing
Long-term, subsidised rental housing is provided to assist people who have extreme difficulty in accessing housing in the private housing market. The collective term for this type of housing is ‘social housing’ which in New South Wales includes:
- ‘public housing’ managed by Homes NSW (a division of the Department of Communities and Justice)
- ‘community housing’ managed by non-government organisations (social housing providers)
- housing for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples managed by the Aboriginal Housing Office or Aboriginal social housing providers.
In New South Wales, applications for housing assistance are managed through Housing Pathways. This is a partnership between Homes NSW, including the Aboriginal Housing Office, and participating community housing providers. Housing Pathways provides a single application process, common eligibility criteria, a standard assessment process and a single waiting list known as the NSW Housing Register.
This audit will assess whether social housing is effectively and efficiently prioritised to meet the needs of vulnerable households, and whether social housing tenants are effectively supported to establish and sustain their tenancies.
The audit will assess all types of social housing including public housing, community housing and housing for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
The Audit Office is seeking experiences or views on:
- the process of applying for social housing (including evidence requirements)
- the process of being offered and accepting a social housing property
- support programs and services offered to new social housing tenants.
If you have experiences or views on these areas, you can share them with the Audit Office. This can be done anonymously if you wish. We will consider all feedback provided as we conduct this audit.
Please note that the audit mailbox will close at 5pm on Friday 28 February 2025.
You can provide feedback on this audit either through the ‘contribute to this audit’ button in the left hand menu (or the comment icon on top right for mobile) or through this link.
We may use your feedback to identify key themes, risks or issues which we may investigate further during the audit. In some instances, we may use extracts of contributions in our audit report as examples of feedback provided where appropriate. If we use extracts of a contribution, we will not identify the source in the report.
However, please note:
- We will not examine individual matters, nor can we investigate all issues or concerns raised. In general, the audit team will look for supporting evidence from other sources (such as documentation, data and audit interviews). Please contact the Department of Communities and Justice, individual community housing providers, the Registrar of Community Housing, Tenants Advice and Advocacy Services, the NSW Ombudsman, or the Independent Commission Against Corruption regarding individual matters (details below).
- We will not share your feedback with any party, including the Department of Communities and Justice or any community housing providers, nor do we publish feedback on our website.
- While we will consider all feedback provided, we may not contact you to discuss.
- We are not able to answer questions or provide information collected during the course of the audit.
- Performance audits focus on assessing whether public money is spent efficiently, effectively, economically and in compliance with the law. The Auditor-General is not permitted to question the merits of government policy objectives. Please visit the Performance audit guide for audited entities (including non-public sector entities) for more information on how we undertake performance audits.
The Audit Office is required by section 38 of the Government Sector Audit Act 1983 to keep information gathered during the course of a performance audit confidential and the Audit Office takes its responsibilities under these sections seriously.
Exceptions include the Auditor-General’s Report to Parliament – a public document – and where the Audit Office is permitted or required to disclose information under other legislation.
All information that the Audit Office receives, and working papers that the Audit Office creates during an audit, are classed as excluded information in Schedule 2 of the Government Information (Public Sector) Act 2009 (GIPA Act). An access application under the GIPA Act cannot be made for excluded information.
For more information on our confidentiality obligations, please visit Our confidentiality and reporting obligations for contributions page.
If you have questions or feedback about individual matters, you can:
- contact the Department of Communities and Justice online or by calling 1800 422 322
- contact a community housing provider through their individual website or contact details
- contact the Registrar for Community Housing to make a complaint against a community housing provider online or by calling 1800 330 940
- contact Tenants Advice and Advocacy Services for tenancy and legal advice. Their website provides online forms and phone numbers for advice.
- make a complaint to the NSW Ombudsman online or by calling 1800 451 524
- make a complaint about corruption to the Independent Commission Against Corruption online or by calling 02 8281 5999.
Actions for Coastal management
Coastal management
The coast is one of our greatest assets in New South Wales and is home to nearly 85% of the state’s population. The NSW Government has established a framework to manage the coastal environment in a sustainable way for the wellbeing of the people of New South Wales.
The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) and the Department of Planning, Housing, and Infrastructure (DPHI) oversee and facilitate implementation of the coastal management framework by local councils.
The key policy instruments under this framework are:
- the Coastal Management Act 2016 (the Act), under which local councils in the coastal zone prepare coastal management programs to set the long-term strategy for the coordinated management of land within the coastal zone, and
- the coastal management chapter of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 (the SEPP), which aims to promote an integrated and coordinated approach to land use planning in the coastal zone in a manner consistent with the objects of the Coastal Management Act 2016.
This audit will assess whether DCCEEW, DPHI and select local councils are effectively implementing the coastal management framework to manage the NSW coastal environment.
The selected local councils for this audit are City of Coffs Harbour Council, Northern Beaches Council and Shoalhaven City Council.
The audit will answer the following questions:
- Are DCCEEW and DPHI effectively overseeing and facilitating councils’ implementation of the coastal management framework?
- Have councils effectively developed plans and priorities for coastal management?
The audit will not assess:
- The merits of NSW Government policy objectives, decisions relating to coastal management program certification, coastal management actions identified or implemented by councils and/ or NSW Government agencies, and land use planning and development decisions under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
- Whether certified coastal management programs meet the requirements of the Coastal Management Act 2016 or coastal management manual.
- Implementation of policy objectives under strategies or initiatives outside of the coastal management framework (e.g., Marine Estate Management Strategy, State Disaster Mitigation Plan).
If you have experiences or views on how NSW Government agencies or local councils are managing the NSW coastal environment relevant to the audit scope, you can share them with the Audit Office. This can be done anonymously if you wish.
Please note that the audit mailbox will be open to receive submissions until close of business on 30 November 2024.
You can provide feedback on this audit either through the ‘contribute to this audit’ button in the left hand menu (or the comment icon on top right for mobile) or through this link.
We may use your feedback to identify key themes, risks or issues which may then be further investigated during the audit. In some instances, we may use extracts of contributions in our audit report as examples of feedback provided where appropriate. If we use extracts of a contribution, we will not identify the source in the report.
However, please note:
- We will not examine individual matters, nor can we investigate all issues or concerns raised. Please see the contact details listed below for relevant contacts. In general, the audit team will look for supporting evidence from other sources (such as documentation, data and audit interviews).
- We will not share your feedback with any party, including the audited agencies and councils, nor do we publish feedback on our website.
- While we will consider all feedback provided, we may not contact you to discuss.
- We are not able to answer questions or provide information collected during the course of the audit.
- Performance audits focus on assessing whether public money is spent efficiently, effectively, economically and in compliance with the law. The Auditor-General is not permitted to question the merits of government policy objectives. Please visit the Performance audit guide for audited entities (including non-public sector entities) for more information on how we undertake performance audits.
The Audit Office is required by section 38 of the Government Sector Audit Act to keep information obtained during an audit confidential and the Audit Office takes its responsibilities under these sections very seriously.
All information that the Audit Office receives, and working papers that the Audit Office creates during an audit, are classed as excluded information in Schedule 2 of the Government Information (Public Sector) Act 2009 (GIPA Act). An access application under the GIPA Act cannot be made for excluded information.
If you have questions or comments about individual matters, you can:
- contact your local council
- make a complaint about a council or NSW government agency to the NSW Ombudsman online or by calling 1800 451 524
- make a complaint about corruption to the Independent Commission Against Corruption online or by calling 02 8281 5999.
Click here for more information on our confidentiality and reporting obligations for submissions received via our website.
Actions for Internal controls and governance 2024
Internal controls and governance 2024
About this report
Internal controls are key to the accuracy and reliability of agencies’ financial reporting processes. This report analyses the internal controls and governance of 26 of the NSW public sector’s largest agencies for the 2023–24 financial year.
Findings
There are gaps in key business processes, which expose agencies to risks. These gaps are identified in 121 findings across the 26 agencies—including 4 high risk, 73 moderate risk and 44 low risk findings. All four high-risk issues related to IT controls and 19% of control deficiencies were repeat issues. Thirty-five per cent of agencies had deficiencies in control over privileged access.
Shared IT services
Six agencies provide IT shared services to 120 other customer agencies. All six had control deficiencies—three of these were high risk. Four agencies provide no independent assurance to their customers about the effectiveness of their own IT controls.
Cyber security
Eighteen agencies assessed cyber risk as being above their risk appetite. Fourteen of these agencies had not set a timeframe to resolve these risks and two agencies have not funded plans to improve cyber security.
Fraud and corruption control
Agencies need to improve fraud and corruption control. Instances of non-compliance with TC18-02 NSW Fraud and Corruption Policy were identified, including gaps such as a lack of comprehensive employment screening policies and not reporting matters to the audit and risk committee.
Gifts and benefits
Management of gifts and benefits requires better governance and transparency. All agencies had policy and guidance but all had gaps in management and implementation—such as not publishing registers nor providing ongoing training.
Information Technology
Nine agencies did not effectively restrict or monitor user access to privileged accounts.
Recommendations
The report makes recommendations to agencies to implement proper controls and improve processes in relation to:
- organisational processes
- information technology
- cyber security
- fraud and corruption, and
- gifts and benefits.
Read the PDF report
Internal controls are processes, policies and procedures that help agencies to:
- operate effectively and efficiently
- produce reliable financial reports
- comply with laws and regulations
- support ethical government.
This chapter outlines the overall trends for agency controls and governance issues, including the number of audit findings, the degree of risk those deficiencies pose to the agency, and a summary of the most common deficiencies found across agencies.
This chapter outlines our audit observations, conclusions and recommendations arising from our review of agency controls to manage key financial systems.
This chapter outlines our audit observations, conclusions and recommendations arising from our review of agencies' cyber security.
This chapter outlines our audit observations, conclusions and recommendations from our review of agencies' fraud and corruption control framework, policies and practices. Our Internal Controls and Governance 2018 found a number of fraud and corruption control gaps in NSW Government.
The NSW Treasury Circular TC18-02 NSW Fraud and Corruption Control Policy (the Circular) requires NSW government agencies to develop, implement and maintain a fraud and corruption control framework. The Circular sets out minimum standards for a NSW Government agency’s fraud and corruption control framework.
Previous Audit Office report on agency fraud and corruption control
Report on Internal Controls and Governance 2018 (published October 2018) The report found there were gaps in the fraud and corruption controls by some agencies, which increased the risk of reputational damage and financial loss. Where relevant, we have included the results from our 2018 report on Internal Controls and Governance below for comparison purposes. |
This chapter outlines our audit observations, conclusions and recommendations arising from our review of agencies' managing of gifts and benefits.
Actions for Supporting students with disability
Supporting students with disability
Click here for the Easy English version of the report snapshot
The Easy English version is intended to meet the needs of some people with lower literacy skills, some people with an intellectual disability, and some people from different cultural backgrounds.
The Easy English document is not the final audit report that has been prepared and tabled in NSW Parliament under s.38EB and s.38EC of the Government Sector Audit Act 1983. It should not be relied on or quoted from as the final audit report.
About this report
Australian and state legislation protects the right of students with disability to a quality education, free from discrimination. These require that students with disability be supported to access and participate in education on the same basis as their peers without disability.
This audit assessed whether the NSW Department of Education is effectively supporting students with disability in NSW public schools.
Findings
The Department has effectively designed approaches and developed reforms under its 2019 Disability Strategy and related measures.
But it still hasn’t resolved longstanding issues with funding, access to targeted supports, monitoring school practice and tracking outcomes for students with disability.
This is despite the Department being made aware of these performance gaps for almost two decades across multiple audits, parliamentary inquiries and the recent national Disability Royal Commission.
Recommendations
The report makes five recommendations to address these gaps, including that the Department should:
- annually monitor the experiences and outcomes of students with disability to be able to identify and address emerging issues, and promote good practice
- reform funding to be better aligned to student needs
- enhance guidance and support to schools and families on making reasonable adjustments for students with disability.
Background
Australian legislation protects the right of students with disability to a quality education, free from discrimination, and describes the obligations of education providers to these students.
Under the federal Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) and related legislated Disability Standards for Education 2005 (the Disability Standards), education providers have legal responsibilities to make education and training accessible to students with disability, including in enrolment, participation, curriculum and support services. This is to be done through providing ‘reasonable adjustments’ or measures and actions that assist students with disability to access education on the same basis as students without disability.
The NSW Department of Education (the Department) is responsible for supporting students with disability in NSW public schools. The Department and schools provide a range of adjustments and targeted supports, in consultation with the student and/or their parents/guardians. In 2023, approximately 206,000 children or young people in NSW public schools (around one-quarter of all public school students) had disability and received adjustments in NSW.
The state Education Act 1990, Disability Inclusion Act 2014 and Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 also protect the right of students with disability in NSW to a quality, accessible education free from discrimination. For public schools in NSW, legislative obligations are articulated in key policy and practice documents including the Inclusive Education Statement and Policy, NSW Wellbeing Framework for Schools, and Achieving School Excellence in Wellbeing and Inclusion tool and associated resources.
A number of key reviews conducted over the last two decades have considered the experiences of students with disability and the effectiveness of school and departmental practices in meeting their needs. In 2017, a NSW Parliamentary inquiry found that while there were many instances of excellence, the inclusive approach to education provision promoted in legislation and policy was not the reality experienced by many students with disability in NSW schools at that time. In response, the Department released its Disability Strategy in 2019 with a commitment to building a more inclusive education system in which all children thrive academically, physically, emotionally, and mentally. The strategy focused on four key reform areas:
- investing in teachers and other support staff
- developing new resource models and support to meet individual student needs
- streamlining processes and improving communication and access to information
- building an evidence base to measure progress.
Audit Objective
This audit assessed whether the Department of Education is effectively supporting students with disability in NSW public schools. It reviews relevant evidence relating to the six calendar years 2018–2023, guided by the following questions:
- Has the Department designed and delivered approaches that effectively support students with disability?
- Is the Department addressing the needs of students with disability?
Conclusion
The Department of Education has effectively designed approaches and developed reforms aimed at improving the support provided to students with disability. However, key initiatives that target longstanding and well-known issues have not been implemented in a timely way, limiting the effectiveness of the Department’s support for students with disability in NSW public schools.
The Department, in its 2019 Disability Strategy, committed to building a more inclusive education system, ‘one where all students feel welcomed and are learning to their fullest capacity’. Under the strategy the Department commenced new initiatives and strengthened existing ones to modify school funding, improve teacher skills and resources, enhance accessible school infrastructure, and increase engagement with students and families.
However, key initiatives have been in place for less than eighteen months, and some remain outstanding. The Department’s efforts have not resolved longstanding issues including unmet demand for targeted supports, gaps in professional learning and practice guidance for school staff, and inconsistent central monitoring of school practice and outcomes data. This is despite the Department being made aware of these issues for almost two decades across multiple audits, parliamentary inquiries and the recent national Disability Royal Commission.
Since 2018 the proportion of NSW public school students with disability has grown from one-fifth to one-quarter. While the Department is making efforts across a range of disability reform areas, many students, families and schools continue to feel they have not been adequately supported.
The Department does not know how effectively it is meeting the needs of students with disability because it has not consistently monitored outcomes for students with disability or schools’ inclusive education practices. Our own analysis of the Department’s data shows that there has been improvement in some student learning outcomes, but deterioration in some measures of student wellbeing.
Key findings
The Department effectively designed its Disability Strategy based on evidence and broad stakeholder input, and provides a range of supports to schools for students with disability
The Department defines an inclusive education system as one where all students feel welcomed and are learning to their fullest capacity. Under the 2019 Disability Strategy it committed to building this, and put in place a variety of measures to support schools in meeting the needs of students with disability.
In designing the strategy, the Department responded to the recommendations from the 2017 Parliamentary inquiry, and undertook a literature review analysis of evidence-based practices and personalised learning approaches. The Department also consulted widely, including with schools, experts and people with disability.
The Department introduced 15 new initiatives, and strengthened a similar number of existing ones, to better support students with disability in NSW public schools. These included initiatives aimed at:
- reforming the basis for relevant funding to better reflect student need
- increasing the provision of inclusive education courses in tertiary education and professional learning, and teaching resources for educators and school staff
- increasing access to allied health and school counsellor/psychologist services
- creating more inclusive learning spaces in school infrastructure
- improving communication to, and exploring ways to obtain better feedback from, students and parents/guardians.
The Department has established governance arrangements focused on inclusive education, and provides professional development and teaching resources for schools. Some specialist central staff roles are funded in regional teams and in schools across the state to advise schools in making reasonable adjustments for individual students with disability. The Department provides disability-specific funding on top of base school allocations, and funds infrastructure integration works in response to individual student needs for accessible school grounds. A full list of initiatives and supports for students with disability in NSW public schools is at Appendix two.
The Department’s efforts to reform support for students with disability have not been timely
Performance gaps in Department and school supports for students with disability have been repeatedly identified through public reviews over the last two decades. This includes unmet demand for targeted supports, gaps in professional learning and practice guidance for school staff, and inconsistent central monitoring of school practice and outcomes data. The 2017 Parliamentary inquiry, which the 2019 Disability Strategy responded to, found many of the same issues that were identified in our 2006 audit Educating Primary School Students with Disabilities conducted eleven years earlier. These concerns were also highlighted in a 2010 NSW Parliamentary inquiry and in five-yearly reviews of the federal Disability Standards. The Disability Strategy initiatives came thirteen years after many of the same risks were identified in our 2006 audit. Had these been implemented sooner, an entire cohort of students with disability who completed primary and secondary education in that time may have had a different schooling experience.
While the Department has delivered almost all the Disability Strategy initiatives since it commenced in 2019, the few that are outstanding are fundamental to determining the success of the Disability Strategy:
- reforming all streams of disability funding to be based on student needs, so that schools have more resources, and those resources will be more flexible
- consistently tracking outcomes for students with disability, families and teachers to understand what is changing in their lived experiences of education.
The Department did not examine whether actions in the Strategy were addressing the intent of previous recommendations
The reform areas and initiatives in the Disability Strategy reflected evidence from previous reviews, as well as contemporary research literature and broad stakeholder consultation. Stakeholders we heard from - including academics, advocates and peak bodies - broadly agreed that the strategy addressed the right areas for action.
The strategy reform initiatives targeted areas that had been repeatedly identified as issues in previous public inquiries held over the past twenty years including: insufficient funding, workforce constraints, gaps in professional learning, inadequate outcomes tracking, and limited engagement with students and families.
While the Department advised that it has implemented the accepted recommendations from previous reviews into disability support and inclusive education, the Department’s approach to tracking recommendations does not include assessing whether the action taken has met the intent of the relevant recommendation. Without this, there is a risk that previously identified gaps and performance issues are not addressed and persist or recur in the future.
While the Department’s governance arrangements were suitable for the design and implementation of the Disability Strategy, the Department did not consider why areas that had been repeatedly identified were still not resolved. This audit found that students, families and schools continue to feel the impact of issues that the recommendations from past reviews aimed to improve, raising questions about the accountability for, and effectiveness of, the Department’s responses.
The Department does not know how effectively it is meeting the needs of students with disability
Schools are legally required to provide individualised supports to students with disability where these are needed for students with disability to be able to access and participate in education on the same basis as their peers without disability. The Department captures schools’ data on the reasonable adjustments they are making for students with disability through the annual Nationally Consistent Collection of Data on students with disability (NCCD).
Where students with disability receive targeted supports such as placement in a support class or specific school funding to learn effectively in a mainstream class, schools are also required to annually review student needs in consultation with the student, their families and teachers, and respond to any changes.
The Department provides schools with guidance and specialist staff to support making reasonable adjustments for students with disability to access and participate in education on the same basis as their peers. However, the Department does not independently verify school evidence on adjustments made and does not have visibility of where reasonable adjustments provided are not meeting students’ needs (for example, where targeted supports are not available) unless a complaint is made or escalated to the Department.
Stakeholders we heard from – both from schools and families – said that there can still be conflicting views about what reasonable adjustments are required in particular situations, and that information provided is vague. The Department has accepted the recommendations of previous reviews and the Disability Royal Commission to improve its guidance and resources for schools and families about reasonable adjustments.
The Department also has a legislative and policy obligation to understand and address the particular needs and potential barriers to accessing supports that may be experienced by students with disability who also have other identities or characteristics such as being Aboriginal, living in rural or remote areas, socioeconomic disadvantage, or speaking English as an additional language or dialect (also known as intersectionality).
While the Department has taken some steps to consider intersectionality for students with disability in its policies and resources, it has not reduced the impacts where these create compounding factors of disadvantage. The Department was unable to demonstrate that it was meeting the needs of these students.
The Department’s criteria for accessing targeted supports for disability has not been updated in over 20 years
If a student with disability has moderate to high needs and requires specialist support that cannot be met with existing school funding and staffing resources, their school may apply to the Department for targeted supports through the ‘access request’ process. Applications are decided by a panel of regional departmental staff including learning and wellbeing staff; primary, high school and Schools for Specific Purposes principal representatives; and a senior education psychologist.
Access to almost all targeted supports is limited to eligible students with disability who have a confirmed medical diagnosis that falls within the Department’s 2003 disability criteria. These criteria exclude those students with undiagnosed disability or with diagnosed disabilities that fall outside the Department’s criteria, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and dyslexia.
Despite limitations with the current criteria being highlighted in multiple parliamentary inquiries over the past 13 years, the Department has not updated these criteria since 2003. It advises that updated criteria will be released from term four, 2024.
The Department does not have a clear and accurate picture of demand compared to supply, or the time taken for targeted supports to be provided to students
The Department tracks if applications for targeted supports have been supported, deferred, declined or withdrawn through the access request panel process. However, the rationale for why an application has been deferred or declined is not consistently recorded in the system.
The Department does not maintain waiting lists for students deemed eligible for targeted supports where the support is not available. In particular, for support classes, while the Department has centralised statewide oversight of class numbers and locations to inform decisions about establishing new classes each year, it does not have a clear picture of demand at local geographic levels at any point in time.
Although recommended in our 2006 audit, the Department still does not monitor the time taken for targeted supports to be provided to eligible students after an application has been approved for provision, so cannot tell how long students with identified needs are waiting for supports to reach them.
The Department has not consistently monitored outcomes for students with disability
The Department started to develop a framework to measure the outcomes of students with disability, at a system level, in 2019. These include wellbeing, independence and learning growth outcomes, informed by measures including students’ perceptions, supports provided, educators’ understanding and skills, and satisfaction of parents/guardians. The framework is comprehensive and evidence-based, and includes existing datasets to minimise the administrative burden on schools. The Department tested proposed measures to validate their reliability.
While there are many complexities in comparing progress and experiences across all students with disability due to the diversity across this cohort, and a range of data limitations that needed to be addressed, the implementation of this framework was not timely. Although the domains, outcomes and metrics for the disability outcomes framework were endorsed by the Department executive in 2022, the framework was still not fully operational in September 2024. Since executive endorsement, the Department has updated the framework to reflect the final accepted recommendations of the Disability Royal Commission and to ensure alignment with the NSW Government’s 2023-2027 Plan for Public Education. It advises that it has started to implement the framework in a staged approach.
The Department has the ability to link data which identifies students with disability with a variety of its other datasets, such as student attendance, suspensions and expulsions, participation and results in the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) and the Higher School Certificate (HSC). The Department uses these linked datasets to inform the development of statewide policy and guidance on practice in schools periodically. However, it is not using the datasets to regularly monitor school practice, identify and address emerging issues, or identify and promote ‘what works’ to support students with disability.
The Department’s School Excellence Framework involves schools self-assessing and peer-reviewing their performance in learning, teaching and leading at least once every five years, but this has not had a specific focus on inclusive education to date. A policy monitoring process involves schools reporting on their compliance with specific policies annually, but this did not include the Disability Standards until 2024. Schools provide some information in their public annual reports about their disability funding expenditure, but this reporting is not outcomes-focused.
The Department runs annual surveys of students, parents/guardians and teachers called ‘Tell Them From Me’. This survey gives students with disability and their families a direct voice to schools and the Department, although the survey is voluntary and not accessible for some students with complex learning and communication needs (the Department is developing a suite of accessible tools to be able to seek feedback from these students in the future). However, the Department does not regularly analyse the Tell Them From Me survey response data to understand whether the experiences of students with disability or their families are changing since the Disability Strategy and related efforts.
Complaints are another way by which the Department can obtain insight into school practice and student outcomes. However, the Department does not have oversight of the number, type or trends in complaints that arise and are resolved at the school level, including those concerning students with disability.
The Department was aware from the 2017 Parliamentary inquiry and the Disability Royal Commission that students with disability and their families can be reluctant to make complaints to their principal about their school, perceiving a conflict of interest and risk of negative consequences. However, the Department was not seeking feedback from complainants about the resolution of their complaint when these were made at the school level, or from students with disability and their families more broadly (in the absence of complaints). The Department advises that it is taking steps in 2024 to seek and address feedback from parents/guardians on their experience in raising concerns at the school level.
The Department has not tracked the impact of the Disability Strategy on the experiences of students, families and schools
Although the Disability Strategy outlined a vision for inclusive education and success measures that sought changed experiences of students, families and teachers, the Department did not establish a time horizon by which the strategy vision and success measures were expected to be realised, nor baseline information against which change could be assessed.
While it evaluated some individual initiatives under the strategy, it did not have an evaluation framework in place for the strategy as a whole and has not assessed how the experiences of students, families and schools have or haven’t changed as a result of the implementation of the Disability Strategy overall.
The Department has taken steps to reform the distribution of disability funding, but this was not timely, and evidence on whether resourcing is adequate to meet the needs of students with disability remains unclear
The Department has publicly acknowledged that ‘effectively resourcing schools is crucial to building an inclusive education system and improving outcomes for, and experiences of, students with disability.’
Stakeholders to this audit – including parents/guardians, school staff and advocacy organisations – consistently said that existing funding to support students with disability is not sufficient to meet their learning needs. Most of the previous public reviews also identified inadequate funding as a key challenge to providing inclusive education.
The Department allocated annual disability-specific funding to NSW public schools totalling approximately $1.1 billion in 2018 rising to $1.9 billion in 2023. This represents an annual average cost above the base allocations of $7,300 per student with disability in 2018 and $9,300 in 2023.
The Department commenced a program of work in 2020 to review and reform the disability-specific funding provided to schools. This sought to change the distribution of funding so that resourcing is linked to a student’s functional needs at school and reflects a school’s efforts to support a student with disability relative to these needs, rather than relying on students’ medical diagnoses or academic performance.
During the audit review period the Department:
- forecasted future funding needs
- revised the funding model for the disability equity loading allocated to mainstream schools to use towards all their students with disability who need supports, regardless of diagnoses – the Department estimated this would more than double the number of students who could be supported by this funding
- provided supplementary funding to Schools for Specific Purposes for 2020–2024, and
- sought government approval and resourcing to change the thresholds for targeted funding support for individual students with disability who have moderate to high learning needs in mainstream classrooms (not yet implemented).
While the Department made important advances in funding reforms, these efforts were not timely, coming around a decade after being recommended by the 2010 Parliamentary inquiry.
Nationally, evidence on the costs to schools to make adjustments to support students with disability is not clear. A 2019 federal review into the Australian Government disability loading for states and territories concluded that there was significant variation in these cost estimates and recommended that joint work be undertaken by the Australian, state and territory governments to produce more nuanced estimates.
In late 2023, the Disability Royal Commission made several recommendations to review disability funding and transparency in the education sector, which the Australian Government and state and territory governments jointly accepted in principle in July 2024.
The Department’s data shows mixed results for students with disability
Our analysis of the Department’s data showed that there had been some improvements for students with disability in the time of the Disability Strategy. This includes an overall reduction in the number of suspensions and expulsions for students with disability, and an increase in the number of students with disability receiving HSC results.
However, there was limited individual student growth in NAPLAN exams over this time, and deterioration in some measures of student wellbeing relating to self-reports of a sense of belonging and experiences of bullying at school. Aboriginal students with disability were worse off than their non-Aboriginal peers with disability in relation to suspension, expulsion, individual student growth and reported experiences of bullying.
Recommendations
By January 2026, the Department of Education should:
- At least annually, monitor the experiences and outcomes of students with disability to:
- identify and address emerging issues
- identify and promote good practice
- take effective steps where there is a need to improve longer-term student outcomes, and
- consider the impacts of intersectionality.
- Continue to expand the use of NCCD data to support funding allocation in accordance with the needs of students with disability.
- Work with the Australian Government on reviews of the disability loading settings to ensure NSW public schools are adequately funded to support students with disability.
- Work with stakeholders to enhance guidance and practical support to public schools and families on reasonable adjustments for students with disability, including ways to resolve conflicting views in a timely manner.
- Improve the planning and delivery of targeted supports by:
- obtaining a clear and timely picture of the supply of, and demand for, targeted supports at a local and statewide level to identify and address constraints
- monitoring the time taken for targeted supports to be provided to eligible students, and addressing delays so that adequate support is put in place once need is identified
- reducing the administrative burden for schools in applying for targeted supports, and
- making the basis for decisions transparent to schools and families.
Under the Disability Strategy, the Department released the Inclusive Education Statement to provide direction and guidance on supporting the inclusion of students with disability in NSW public schools (section 3.2 above). The statement expressed a commitment of the Department to ‘building a more inclusive education system… where every student is known, valued and cared for and all students are learning to their fullest capability.’
However, as the Department does not consistently monitor outcomes for students with disability or schools’ inclusive education practices (section 3.6 above), it does not have oversight of whether the Inclusive Education Statement is being given effect and achieving desired outcomes for students with disability, parents/guardians and schools.
Our 2006 audit Educating primary school students with disabilities found that it was not possible to determine whether the performance of ‘special education’ services had improved over time as there had been no mechanism in place to measure results. It recommended that the Department develop a suite of performance indicators to monitor and manage supports for students with disability at a school, region and state level. This is still not being done systematically, and the Department cannot tell whether things are improving for students with disability in NSW.
Our analysis of the Department’s data shows that over the audit review period 2018-2023 there has been improvement in some measures of school practice such as the use of suspensions and expulsions, and improvement in some student learning outcomes, but deterioration in some measures of student wellbeing.
Self-reported survey data shows improvements in the experiences of students with disability in primary school but these have worsened for students in secondary school
Statewide data from the annual Tell Them From Me student survey shows that secondary students with disability are less likely to agree with statements related to receiving support from teachers in 2023 compared to 2018 (47% agreeing in 2018 declining to 44% in 2023). Results for students with disability in primary school to similar survey questions have remained steady with around 70% agreeing that their teacher supports them in both 2018 and 2023.
A higher proportion of primary school students overall reported that they had never been bullied in 2023 compared to 2018. For students with disability in primary schools, the proportion reporting that they had never been bullied lifted from 66% in 2018 to 69% in 2023, however there was variability across individual years. For primary school students without disability, 75% reported that they had never been bullied in 2018, compared to 76% in 2023.
The proportion of students with disability in secondary school reporting that they had never been bullied increased from 65% in 2018 to 69% in 2020, but then dropped to 66% in 2023. By comparison, the rate of students without disability reporting that they had never been bulled improved between 2018 and 2020 (from 75% to 78%) but then worsened in 2023 (74%).
Students with disability in both primary and secondary schools were less likely to agree with questions about having a sense of belonging at school in 2023 compared to 2018. For secondary school students with disability, 49% agreed with questions relevant to belonging in 2018, which dropped to 43% in 2023. In primary schools, where survey results indicate there was a greater sense of belonging amongst all students than in secondary schools, there was also a drop for students with disability from 62% in 2018 to 57% in 2023.
There has been an overall increase in parents/guardians completing the Tell Them From Me parent/guardian survey since 2018. Survey results show that parents/guardians of children with disability are less likely to have their child enrolled at their first choice of public school than parents/guardians of children without disability. The proportion of parents/guardians of children with disability reporting that their child was enrolled at their first choice has slightly worsened between 2019 (when the question was first included in the survey) and 2023, from 87% in 2019 to 85% in 2023. The proportion of parents/guardians of students without disability who said their child was enrolled at their first choice of public school remained steady between 2019 to 2023 at close to 90%.
There was limited individual student growth in NAPLAN results for the majority of students with disability
Individual student growth is a measure of the progress of individual students in their NAPLAN results across their educational journey from Year 3 to Year 9. NAPLAN is an annual national assessment for all students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. It tests skills in reading, numeracy, writing, spelling and grammar.
For most of the audit review period, all students participating in NAPLAN were assessed against national minimum standards in each exam as being below, at, or above standards. NAPLAN assessments and reporting changed in 2023, with four proficiency standards replacing the previous 10-band structure and the national minimum standards. For this reason, NAPLAN results from 2023 cannot be compared with those from earlier years.
Our analysis of the Department’s data found that, for students with disability who participated in a NAPLAN exam more than once between 2018 and 2022:
- 60% had no change in whether they placed below, at or above the national minimum standards (compared to 83% of students without disability).
- 11% had an improvement, either moving from below the national minimum standards to be at the standards, or moving from being at to above the standards (compared to 4% of students without disability).
- 22% had a decline, either moving from being above the national minimum standards to be at the standards, or from being at the standards to being below them (compared to 9% of students without disability).
Exhibit 23 provides a breakdown of our analysis of student growth for each test type for students with disability between 2018 and 2022.
Appendix one – Response from agency
Appendix two – Relevant initiatives and supports
Appendix three – NCCD definitions
Appendix four – The Department’s principles of inclusive education
Appendix five – Student behaviour management and restrictive practices
Appendix six – Relevant funding for NSW public schools
Appendix seven – The Department’s Disability Criteria (2003)
Appendix eight – About the audit
Appendix nine – Performance auditing
© Copyright reserved by the Audit Office of New South Wales. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without prior consent of the Audit Office of New South Wales. The Audit Office does not accept responsibility for loss or damage suffered by any person acting on or refraining from action as a result of any of this material.
Parliamentary reference - Report number #400- released 26 September 2024.
If you have questions or feedback about individual matters, you can:
- contact the NSW Department of Education through the website
- make a complaint to the NSW Ombudsman online or by calling 1800 451 524.
Actions for Education in alternative settings
Education in alternative settings
Under the Education Act 1990 every child has the right to receive an education. The Act provides that:
- the education of a child is primarily the responsibility of the child’s parents, and
- the state has a duty to ensure every child receives an education of the highest quality, principally through providing public education.
Children of compulsory age are required to be enrolled at, and to attend, a government school or a registered non-government school, or to be registered and receive instruction for home schooling.
The audit aims to assess whether students who may experience difficulties in receiving an education in a mainstream classroom environment in New South Wales (NSW), or who choose to not be educated in a mainstream classroom environment, have access to a quality education, regardless of their circumstances, when in alternative educational settings.
This audit will assess the effectiveness of the NSW Department of Education and the NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA) in supporting students to receive a quality education when delivered in alternative education settings.
In doing so, the audit will have two criteria to examine whether:
- Agencies provide or support alternative education settings for students to ensure continuity of education:
- Alternative settings are accessible and available in a timely way to students.
- Transitions into and out of alternative settings support continuity of education.
- Agencies are effectively implementing quality assurance and safeguarding mechanisms for alternative education settings:
- Agencies support students to receive a high quality education in alternative settings.
- Education programs in alternative settings are appropriate to meet the diverse learning needs of students.
- Agencies ensure that child safe standards and/or child protection protocols are applied as relevant.
- The Department monitors outcomes for individual students in alternative settings. NESA checks that home schooled children are receiving instruction.
Included within the audit scope:
- NSW Department of Education alternative educational settings:
- distance education
- schools for specific purposes catering for students with emotional disturbances or behavioural disorders (‘behaviour schools’)
- schools in Youth Justice NSW detention centres
- hospital schools
- Agency management of non-government alternative education setting providers, where relevant
- Home schooling in NSW (regulated by NESA).
Excluded from the audit scope:
- policies and practices at non-government schools, early childhood education and outside school hours care services, or vocational education and training services
- schools for specific purposes catering for students with disability (these were considered through a previous audit, Supporting students with disability)
- support classes located in mainstream schools (these were considered through a previous audit, Supporting students with disability)
- suspension centres and tutorial centres
- in-depth student behaviour management policies and practices (these will be the focus of a future audit on the forward work program)
- merits of government policy objectives.
If you have experiences or views on alternative education settings, you can share them with the Audit Office. This can be done anonymously if you wish. We will consider all feedback provided as we audit the NSW Department of Education and NESA.
Please note that the audit mailbox will close COB Friday 28 February 2025.
You can provide feedback on this audit either through the ‘contribute to this audit’ button in the left hand menu (or the comment icon on top right for mobile) or through this link.
We may use your feedback to identify key themes, risks or issues which may then be further investigated during the audit. In some instances, we may use extracts of contributions in our audit report as examples of feedback provided where appropriate. If we use extracts of a contribution, we will not identify the source in the report.
However, please note:
- We will not examine individual matters, nor can we investigate all issues or concerns raised. In general, the audit team will look for supporting evidence from other sources (such as documentation, data and audit interviews). Please contact the Department of Education, NESA or the NSW Ombudsman regarding individual matters (details below).
- We will not share your feedback with any party, including the Department of Education or NESA, nor do we publish feedback on our website.
- While we will consider all feedback provided, we may not contact you to discuss.
- We are not able to answer questions or provide information collected during the course of the audit.
- Performance audits focus on assessing whether public money is spent efficiently, effectively, economically and in compliance with the law. The Auditor-General is not permitted to question the merits of government policy objectives. Please visit the Performance audit guide for audited entities (including non-public sector entities) for more information on how we undertake performance audits.
The Audit Office is required by section 38 of the Government Sector Audit Act 1983 to keep information gathered during the course of a performance audit confidential and the Audit Office takes its responsibilities under these sections seriously.
Exceptions include the Auditor-General’s Report to Parliament – a public document – and where the Audit Office is permitted or required to disclose information under other legislation.
All information that the Audit Office receives, and working papers that the Audit Office creates during an audit, are classed as excluded information in Schedule 2 of the Government Information (Public Sector) Act 2009 (GIPA Act). An access application under the GIPA Act cannot be made for excluded information.
For more information on our confidentiality obligations, please visit Our confidentiality and reporting obligations for contributions page.
If you have questions or feedback about individual matters, you can:
- contact the NSW Department of Education through the website
- contact the NSW Education Standards Authority through the website
- make a complaint to the NSW Ombudsman online or by calling 1800 451 524.
Actions for Northern Beaches Hospital
Northern Beaches Hospital
In 2014, the State entered into a Public Private Partnership (PPP) with a private operator to deliver the Northern Beaches Hospital. The Northern Beaches Hospital opened in late 2018 and provides free public patient services as well as a range of services for private patients.
This audit will examine whether the Northern Beaches Hospital PPP is efficiently and effectively delivering public hospital services.
In doing so, the audit will answer the following questions:
- Do NSW Health agencies ensure the effective and efficient delivery of public funded hospital services from the Northern Beaches Hospital?
- Do NSW Health agencies effectively identify and monitor risks to the success of the Northern Beaches Hospital?
- Do NSW Health agencies collect the information required to ensure effective delivery of public hospital services at the Northern Beaches Hospital?
- Do NSW Health agencies effectively manage the Northern Beaches Hospital contract to ensure effective delivery of public hospital services at the Northern Beaches Hospital?
- Is the Northern Sydney Local Health District using the Northern Beaches Hospital Public Private Partnership to achieve efficient service delivery?
- Is the operator of the Northern Beaches Hospital effectively delivering public hospital services in selected clinical areas?
- Does the Northern Beaches Hospital meet contract requirements for performance, planning and reporting?
- Does the Northern Beaches Hospital provide quality care consistent with equivalent public health facilities in NSW?
Included within the scope:
- The parties to the Northern Beaches Hospital contract deed: Northern Sydney Local Health District, the Ministry of Health (as the delegate for the Health Administration Corporation) and the private sector operator, NBH Operator Co (a subsidiary of Healthscope Ltd.).
- Comparison against benchmarks for peer or near-peer NSW Health hospitals.
- The audit will focus on two areas of clinical activity: Emergency Department activity and General Surgery.
- The main period of focus for this audit is from July 2022 to June 2024.
Excluded from the scope:
- The decision to deliver the Northern Beaches Hospital via a Public Private Partnership.
- The design and construction phases of the Northern Beaches Hospital Public Private Partnership.
- Quality as it relates to an assessment of the specific effectiveness of clinical activities or scopes of practice. However, the audit may comment on whether the agencies have themselves adequately considered and assessed clinical evidence as part of performance monitoring and oversight of clinical services.
- Merits of government policy objectives.
Actions for Bus contracts in metropolitan Sydney
Bus contracts in metropolitan Sydney
Transport for NSW (TfNSW) enters into contracts with private companies to operate bus services. In Metropolitan Sydney these contracts are worth an estimated $4.8 billion.
This performance audit will assess the effectiveness of Transport for NSW’s design and management of metropolitan Sydney bus service contracts. It will examine whether TfNSW is effectively managing the performance of contracts held by private bus companies to ensure contractual commitments are being met, with a focus on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) relating to customer experience, and whether TfNSW has designed an effective governance regime to underpin the performance management of bus contracts in metropolitan Sydney, and demonstrating that contracts are being managed to deliver value for money.
Actions for State Finances 2024
State Finances 2024
This report will focus on the 2023–24 consolidated financial statements of the NSW general government and total state sectors. It will comment on the key matters that have been the focus of our audits and highlight significant factors that have contributed to the State’s financial results.
Actions for State Government 2024
State Government 2024
This report will analyse the results of the 2023–24 financial statement audits of NSW Government agencies. It will comment on financial reporting and performance, key accounting issues and areas of interest that are in focus during the conduct of our audits.