Refine search Expand filter

Reports

Published

Actions for Additional Entitlements for Members of Parliament 2016

Additional Entitlements for Members of Parliament 2016

Premier and Cabinet
Compliance

For the year ended 30 June 2016, the Members of NSW Parliament reviewed generally complied with requirements of the Parliamentary Remuneration Tribunal’s Determination when spending their additional entitlements.

The Auditor-General conducted an external review of whether Members of NSW Parliament complied with certain requirements outlined in the Parliamentary Remuneration Tribunal’s Determination for the year ended 30 June 2016.

The Auditor-General's review program is designed to cover all Members over the four-year Parliamentary term. The reviews performed are not designed to detect all instances of non-compliance. They provide Parliament with limited assurance about whether Members comply with the Tribunal’s Determination. This year's review covered a sample of 34 Members.

Results

Except for the findings noted below, the Members reviewed complied with the requirements of the Tribunal’s Determination for the year ended 30 June 2016.

Findings

The following instances of non-compliance were identified:

  • One Member claimed their Pay TV subscription, which included children's entertainment channels, from their Logistic Support Allocation. These channels do not aid the Member in performing their Parliamentary duties.

  • One Member returned their unsubstantiated Sydney Allowance to the Department of Parliamentary Services in the month following the 30 September 2016 deadline.

  • Two Members submitted their mid-year reconciliations for the Sydney Allowance in the month following the 31 January 2016 deadline.

  • Two Members submitted their year-end reconciliations for the Sydney Allowance in the month following the 31 July 2016 deadline.

  • One Member did not submit an annual declaration due by 30 June 2016 until November 2016. The declaration related to benefits accrued to the Member by way of loyalty/incentive schemes from using allowances and entitlements. Such benefits must only be used for Parliamentary duties and not for private purposes.

  • Two Members that resigned in May 2016 were required to submit declarations within 30 days of ceasing to be Members. The declarations were submitted in October 2016. The declarations related to benefits accrued to the Members by way of loyalty/incentive schemes from using allowances and entitlements. Such benefits must only be used for Parliamentary duties and not for private purposes

Last year’s Auditor-General’s Report to Parliament included one recommendation. The current status of the recommendation is shown below.

Recommendation Current status
The Parliamentary Remuneration Tribunal should consider, as a part of the next Determination review process, requiring the Department of Parliamentary Services to regularly publish full details of Members' expenditure claims on its website in an accessible and searchable format. The Department should be given some time for consultation with Members and implementation of systems before any new requirements are effective.

The Tribunal is expected to address this recommendation in the 2017 Determination.

The Department has examined the current reporting arrangements in other Parliaments within Australasia and some international jurisdictions. It is preparing briefing material for Parliament's Presiding Officers.
 

 

The Parliamentary Remuneration Tribunal (the Tribunal) determines the salary and entitlements of Members of NSW Parliament (Members). These are set out in the Tribunal’s annual Determination. The NSW Parliament, through the Department of Parliamentary Services (the Department), administers the provision of additional entitlements to Members in accordance with the Tribunal’s Determination

Members’ Additional Entitlements Expenditure

Members claimed 3.5 per cent less expenditure in 2015–16 compared to 2014–15

Members’ additional entitlements expenditure was $21.4 million in 2015–16, 3.5 per cent lower than the previous year of $22.2 million.

Members' Additional Entitlements expenditure for         Increase/(decrease) between
year ended 30 June 2016 2015 2014 2013 2016 and 2015
  $ $ $ $ %
Electoral Allowance 7,377,483 7,180,587 7,054,210 6,887,335 2.7
Sydney Allowance 1,815,257 1,601,849 1,736,562 1,768,873 13.3
Logistic Support Allocation 4,175,894 5,597,161 3,807,404 3,769,676 (25.4)
Electorate Communication Allowance 5,535,204 5,336,400 5,164,282 5,447,837 3.7
Electorate to Sydney Travel 657,040 728,025 810,539 783,789 (9.8)
Committee Allowance 15,417 13,725 19,990 19,288 12.3
Electorate Charter Transport 94,917 48,065 48,656 44,075 97.5
Equipment Services and Facilities* 1,752,938 1,695,224 1,681,377 1,680,512 3.4
Travelling Allowance -- -- -- -- --
Total 21,424,150 22,201,036 20,323,020 20,401,385 (3.5)

*The expenditure includes allowances paid for Additional Temporary Staff only. It does not include the cost of providing Members with a fitted out, equipped and maintained Office/Electoral Office.
Source: Department of Parliamentary Services (unaudited)

For the year ended 30 June 2016, Logistic Support Allocation expenditure decreased by 25.4 per cent. The Department advises last year's expenditure was significantly higher than usual due to additional spending by Members prior to the March 2015 State election. Unexpended Logistic Support Allocation is forfeited at the end of each parliamentary term.  

The 2015–16 Sydney Allowance and Committee Allowance increased by 13.3 per cent and 12.3 per cent respectively, due to fewer sitting days and Committee activities in the prior year because of the State election. The Electorate Charter Transport Allocation almost doubled in 2015–16 due to the full year impact of electorate boundary re-distributions in 2015 and the $20,000 increase for the Barwon electorate.

Detailed findings

Sydney Allowance

One Member failed to return their unspent Sydney Allowance by the due date

For the year ended 30 June 2016, 16 Members spent less than the Sydney Allowance they received as an annual fixed amount and had to return around $93,100 by 30 September 2016 (18 Members and around $99,400 for the year ended 30 June 2015). One Member returned their unspent Sydney Allowance ($4,200) in the month following the 30 September 2016 deadline.

Some Members submitted their allowance reconciliations late

Members receiving the annual Sydney Allowance are required to submit reconciliations twice a year to the Department. Two Members submitted their mid-year reconciliations for Sydney Allowance in the month following the 31 January 2016 deadline and two Members submitted their year-end reconciliations in the month following the 31 July 2016 deadline.  

The Sydney Allowance is provided to Members if their principal place of residence is at least seventy kilometres by road from Parliament House or they reside in an outer non-metropolitan electorate. It compensates Members for additional costs associated with staying in Sydney to attend sessions of Parliament, meetings of Parliamentary committees or other Parliamentary business. At the start of each financial year, a Member can choose to receive the Sydney Allowance as either an annual fixed amount or a daily rate when an overnight stay is needed.

If the actual expenses over the year are less than the amount of the allowance, the excess must be returned within three months of the end of the year.

As shown in the table below, almost half of the Members entitled to the Sydney Allowance elected to receive it as an annual fixed amount for the year ended 30 June 2016.

    Legislative Assembly     Legislative Council  
Year ended 30 June 2015 2015 Post Election 2015 Pre Election 2014  2016 2016 Post Election 2015 Pre Election 2014
Members receiving entitlement on an annual basis 19 16 19 21 8 6 7 7
Members receiving entitlement on a daily rate 25 25 25 20 13 15 14 14

Source: Department of Parliamentary Services

Annual Sydney Allowance

Members receiving the annual Sydney Allowance are required to submit reconciliations twice a year to the Department. The reconciliations help the Department monitor Members' use of the Allowance.  

Daily Sydney Allowance

Members electing the daily rate option claim the allowance as the need for an overnight stay arises. The table below shows the daily rate and number of nights an eligible Member could claim in the year ended 30 June 2016.

Maximum allowable overnight stay* Amount payable for overnight stay where accommodation costs are incurred* Amount payable for transit to and from Sydney where no overnight stay is involved**
From 105 to 180 nights $285 Actual reasonable expenses for meals and incidentals up to a maximum of $104 per day

 * If a Member chooses to receive the daily rate allowance and exceeds the set number of overnight stays, they will be reimbursed actual costs, up to the daily maximum, on production of tax invoices/receipts for each occasion. The maximum depends on a Member’s Parliamentary office and location of principal place of residence.
** This rate is applicable when the Member is traveling to Sydney or travelling home from Sydney following an overnight stay. Members cannot claim the in-transit allowance if they exceed the set number of overnight stays.
Source: Tribunal's Determination 2015

Electorate Communication Allowance

Significantly higher use of Electorate Communication Allowance in June each year

While the average monthly spend (excluding June) from the Electorate Communication Allowance was $343,633 across the last three financial years, Members spent $1.9 million in June 2016, $1.0 million in June 2015 and $1.7 million in June 2014 on electorate communication.  

The Department advises that Members spend more in June because the State budget is delivered in June each year. Many Legislative Assembly Members elect to issue a budget related newsletter at that time. Unused Electorate Communication Allowance funds at the end of each financial year are forfeited.

The graph below compares monthly Electorate Communication Allowance expenditure across the last three financial years. 

Published

Actions for Transport 2016

Transport 2016

Transport
Asset valuation
Compliance
Financial reporting
Fraud
Information technology
Internal controls and governance
Procurement
Project management

Financial reporting within the Transport Cluster continues to improve with reported misstatements down 96 per cent since 2011-12 to just three in 2015-16, according to a report released today by the NSW Auditor-General, Margaret Crawford.

Published

Actions for CBD and South East Light Rail Project

CBD and South East Light Rail Project

Transport
Compliance
Financial reporting
Infrastructure
Internal controls and governance
Management and administration
Procurement
Project management
Risk

Transport for NSW did not effectively plan and procure the CBD and South East Light Rail (CSELR) project to achieve best value for money according to a report released today by NSW Auditor-General, Margaret Crawford.

Transport for NSW is on track to deliver the project, but it will come at a higher cost with lower benefits than in the approved business case.

 

Parliamentary reference - Report number #278 - released 30 November 2016

Published

Actions for Premier and Cabinet 2016

Premier and Cabinet 2016

Premier and Cabinet
Asset valuation
Compliance
Financial reporting
Fraud
Information technology
Internal controls and governance
Procurement
Project management
Risk

There are opportunities for agencies in the Premier and Cabinet cluster to improve financial controls and governance of outsourced service providers. These are the key findings of a report released by the New South Wales Auditor-General, Margaret Crawford.

Published

Actions for Fraud Survey

Fraud Survey

Education
Community Services
Finance
Health
Industry
Justice
Local Government
Planning
Premier and Cabinet
Transport
Treasury
Universities
Whole of Government
Environment
Fraud
Information technology
Internal controls and governance
Procurement
Risk

In a report released today, the NSW Auditor-General, Margaret Crawford provides a snapshot of reported fraud in the NSW public sector and an analysis of NSW Government agencies’ fraud controls based on a survey of 102 agencies.

Published

Actions for Implementation of the NSW Government’s program evaluation initiative

Implementation of the NSW Government’s program evaluation initiative

Industry
Justice
Planning
Premier and Cabinet
Treasury
Environment
Financial reporting
Internal controls and governance
Management and administration
Risk
Service delivery
Shared services and collaboration
Workforce and capability

The NSW Government’s ‘program evaluation initiative’, introduced to assess whether service delivery programs achieve expected outcomes and value for money, is largely ineffective according to a report released today by NSW Auditor-General, Margaret Crawford.

Government services, in areas such as public order and safety, health and education, are delivered by agencies through a variety of programs. In 2016–17, the NSW Government estimates that it will spend over $73 billion on programs to deliver services.

 

Parliamentary reference - Report number #277 - released 3 November 2016

Published

Actions for Government Advertising 2015-16

Government Advertising 2015-16

Premier and Cabinet
Compliance
Management and administration
Workforce and capability

Overall, the peer review process provides good assurance that government advertising campaigns are necessary and cost effective, according to a report released today by the NSW Auditor-General, Margaret Crawford.

In NSW, the Government Advertising Act 2011 requires government advertising campaigns with a likely expenditure over $50,000 to be independently peer reviewed before launch. The Department of Premier and Cabinet manages this process, which includes allocating and coordinating peer reviewers to assess campaigns against the Premier’s ‘Government Advertising Guidelines’.

 

Parliamentary reference - Report number #276 - released 27 October 2016

Published

Actions for Red tape reduction

Red tape reduction

Premier and Cabinet
Finance
Financial reporting
Internal controls and governance
Management and administration
Project management
Regulation
Shared services and collaboration

Overall, NSW Government initiatives and processes to prevent and reduce red tape were not effective, according to a report released today by the NSW Auditor-General.

In 2015, the Government reported that its red tape reduction initiatives, implemented between 2011 and 2015, had resulted in $896 million in savings. While these initiatives resulted in some savings, the total value of savings is unknown because estimates for some initiatives were based on unverified assumptions, cost transfers or unrealised projections.

 

Parliamentary reference - Report number #272 - released 25 August 2016

Published

Actions for Additional entitlements for Members of Parliament 2015

Additional entitlements for Members of Parliament 2015

Premier and Cabinet
Compliance

The Audit Office reviewed whether Members of NSW Parliament complied with certain requirements outlined in the Parliamentary Remuneration Tribunal’s Determination for the year ended 30 June 2015.

The review was designed to provide Parliament with limited assurance about whether a sample of 34 Members complied with the Tribunal’s Determination. The review performed was less than a full audit and not designed to detect all instances of non-compliance.

Published

Actions for Managing unsolicited proposals in New South Wales

Managing unsolicited proposals in New South Wales

Premier and Cabinet
Internal controls and governance
Management and administration
Procurement
Shared services and collaboration

Overall, the governance arrangements for unsolicited proposals are adequate. However, there needs to be greater transparency and public reporting on unsolicited proposals received by government, according to a report released today by the NSW Acting Auditor-General, Tony Whitfield.

'Unsolicited proposals warrant more disclosure as they pose a greater risk to value for money than procurements done through open, competitive and transparent processes,” said Mr Whitfield. “This could include aggregate information about why proposals are declined, as well as more extensive information about proposals that have progressed beyond the preliminary and strategic assessment stages', he added.

 

Parliamentary reference - Report number #268 - released 10 March 2016