Reports
Actions for Sale of the TAB
Sale of the TAB
The Audit Office is of the opinion that:
-
the sale was delivered with reasonable efficiency and effectiveness
-
the sale yielded a satisfactory return to the NSW Government. The possibility for a higher return was limited to about 2% to 4% on gross proceeds of $936m. It would have required setting a higher share price for all investors and adopting a more flexible approach to share allocation
-
the Government’s objective to promote community and investor support was achieved. The scale of the demand for script added to costs and was not fully translated into higher proceeds
-
generally satisfactory accountability frameworks were put in place for the sale and no probity concerns were identified
-
the frameworks to achieve the Government’s wider reforms of the racing and wagering industries have substantially been implemented.
Parliamentary reference - Report number #61 - released 23 December 1998
Actions for Management of research - NSW Health: Infrastructure Grants Program
Management of research - NSW Health: Infrastructure Grants Program
NSW Health has progressed in identifying and addressing key R&D issues in a complex and difficult environment. The Infrastructure Grants Program (IGP) is an innovative program and reflects a commitment by Government to support research infrastructure. The IGP has as its aims the provision of significant funding accompanied by clear research objectives and criteria for accountability and introduces a rational basis for the allocation of infrastructure grants.
While NSW Health has progressed, there is an opportunity to make the IGP more efficient and effective. These opportunities are in the areas of addressing longer term planning issues in health, streamlining and clarifying eligibility and selection criteria, improving decision-making structures and processes and improving accountability.
Parliamentary reference - Report number #56 - released 25 November 1998
Actions for On board: Guide to better practice for Public Sector governing and advisory boards
On board: Guide to better practice for Public Sector governing and advisory boards
In most organisations with a board or committee, there was confusion about the respective roles, powers, responsibilities and accountabilities of the Minister/s, the board and the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). There are a wide variety of governance arrangements in operation across the spectrum of boards and committees. This is partly due to differing arrangements set out in relevant legislation and gaps in legislative detail which have been addressed in a variety of ways.
Under current arrangements, governing boards of SOCs have accountabilities to Shareholding Ministers and Portfolio Ministers, as well as to Ministers who are responsible for industry-wide regulation. Non-corporatised Government businesses have different accountability and control arrangements. The large number of statutory and nonstatutory bodies and authorities have a wide array of governance arrangements. As a result of uncertainty and confusion on governance aspects, The Audit Office observed that many governing boards operate as high level advisory management committees. The audit also found that board and committee practices fell short of standards expected in a professional boardroom culture.
Parliamentary reference - Report number #49 - released 7 April 1998