Treasury 2023

Report highlights

What this report is about

Result of the Treasury portfolio of agencies’ financial statement audits for the year ended 30 June 2023.

The results of the audit of the NSW Government’s consolidated Total State Sector Accounts (TSSA), which are prepared by NSW Treasury, will be reported separately in our report on ‘State Finances 2023’.

The audit found

Unqualified audit opinions were issued on all general purpose financial statement audits.

Qualified audit opinions were issued on two of the 24 other engagements prepared by portfolio agencies. These related to payments made from Special Deposit Accounts that did not comply with the relevant legislation.

The number of monetary misstatements identified in our audits increased from 29 in 2021–22 to 39 in 2022–23.

The new parental leave policy impacted agencies across all portfolios. NSW Treasury should perform annual assessments to identify changes in legislation and regulation and provide timely guidance to the sector.

Transport for NSW and Sydney Metro have capitalised over $300 million of tender bid costs paid to unsuccessful tender bidders relating to significant infrastructure projects. Whilst NSW Treasury policy provides clarity on the reimbursement of unsuccessful bidders’ costs, clearer guidance on how to account for these costs in agencies’ financial statements is required.

The key audit issues were

Five high-risk issues were reported in 2022–23. Three were new findings on contract management, accounting treatments for workers compensation renewal premium adjustments and the management and oversight of a Special Deposit Account. Two repeat issues referred to the need to improve quality review processes over financial reporting and the timely approval of administration costs.

Portfolio agencies should prioritise and action recommendations to address internal control deficiencies.

 

Fast facts

1. Introduction

This report provides Parliament and other users of the Treasury portfolio of agencies’ financial statements with the results of our audits, analysis, conclusions and recommendations in the following areas:

  • financial reporting
  • audit observations.

1.1 Snapshot of the portfolio of agencies

Source: NSW Budget Papers 2023–24.

The NSW Government announced in the 2023–24 budget papers its intention to move away from agency-based outcomes to a broad set of wellbeing and performance measures. The outcomes that were applicable to this portfolio of agencies in 2022–23 are listed below.

Key objectives of the Treasury portfolio: Support the government’s achievement of sustainable economic and financial position, and the transition to net zero and a clean energy future.

State outcomes Description
A strong, resilient and diverse economy Driving whole-of-state economic strategy, that supports a competitive business environment, drives productivity, increases real incomes, fosters employment opportunities, and makes it easy to do business in New South Wales while securing an affordable, reliable and sustainable energy future.
A sustainable fiscal environment enabling delivery of outcomes Managing whole-of-state financial asset and liability activities while maintaining the State’s triple-A credit rating, and working towards full funding of the State’s Defined Benefits Superannuation liability by 2040.
Stewardship of the public sector performance and financial system Steward and support sector performance to deliver outcomes for citizens, ensure transparency and accountability and the effective use of public funds.
Source: NSW Budget Papers 2022–23.

1.2 Changes to the portfolio of agencies

Machinery of Government (MoG) refers to how the government organises the structures and functions of the public service. MoG changes are where the government reorganises these structures and functions that are given effect by administrative arrangement orders.

The Administrative Arrangements (Minns Ministry—Administration of Acts) Order 2023, effective 5 April 2023, transferred the administration of the Infrastructure NSW Act 2011 from the Minister for Transport to the Treasurer. Infrastructure NSW is in the Treasury portfolio effective 5 April 2023.

This report is focused on agencies in the Treasury portfolio as at 30 June 2023.

 

2. Financial reporting

Financial reporting is an important element of good governance. Confidence and transparency in public sector decision-making are enhanced when financial reporting is accurate and timely.

This chapter outlines our audit observations related to the financial reporting of agencies in the Treasury portfolio of agencies (the portfolio) for 2023.

Section highlights

  • Unqualified audit opinions were issued on all Treasury portfolio agencies’ 2022–23 financial statements.
  • Two qualified audit opinions were issued on special purpose financial reports, relating to whether payments from the Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Ausgrid (ERIC-A) Fund and the Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Endeavour (ERIC-E) Fund, complied with the relevant legislation.
  • The total number of errors (both corrected and uncorrected) in the financial statements increased from 29 in 2021–22 to 39 in 2022–23.
    Reported corrected misstatements increased from 15 in 2021–22 to 25 with a gross value of $7.1 billion in 2022–23. Reported uncorrected misstatements increased from 13 in 2021–22 to 14 in 2022–23, with a gross value of $277.6 million in 2022–23.

2.1 Portfolio financial information 2023

Agency

Total
assets
$m

Total
liabilities
$m

Total
income*
$m

Total
expenses**
$m

Principal department

       

NSW Treasury

738 230 1,369 1,265

Other portfolio agencies listed in Appendix A of Treasurer’s Direction TD21-02

Alpha Distribution Ministerial Holding Corporation 194 9 19 17
Electricity Assets Ministerial Holding Corporation 128 50 4 12
Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Ausgrid 7,600 -- 141 51
Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Endeavour Energy 2,807 -- 87 164
Electricity Transmission Ministerial Holding Corporation 204 106 11 6
Energy Corporation of New South Wales 150 108 135 115
Epsilon Distribution Ministerial Holding Corporation 44 6 5 3
Infrastructure NSW 1,723 960 394 337
Insurance and Care NSW 367 354 1,098 1,098
Liability Management Ministerial Corporation 335 -- 37 --
Lifetime Care and Support Authority of New South Wales 9,661 8,593 1,524 1,103
Long Service Corporation 2,290 1,648 322 187
New South Wales Treasury Corporation *** 148,584 148,331 304 175
NSW Self Insurance Corporation 19,104 18,806 5,156 5,176
Port Botany Lessor Ministerial Holding Corporation # 243 -- 52 36
Port Kembla Lessor Ministerial Holding Corporation # 27 -- 8 7
Port of Newcastle Lessor Ministerial Holding Corporation # 38 3 5 5
Workers Compensation (Dust Diseases) Authority 1,957 1,957 135 134
Other portfolio agencies not listed in Appendix A of Treasurer’s Direction TD21-02
Energy Industries Superannuation Scheme Pool A -- -- 262 25
Energy Industries Superannuation Scheme Pool B -- -- 136 159
Energy Investment Fund -- -- 396 --
ERIC Alpha Holdings Pty Ltd 7,600 -- 140 50
ERIC Epsilon Holdings Pty Ltd 2,807 -- 86 163
Generator Property Management Corporation 80 20 49 22
SAS Trustee Corporation Pooled Fund 42,418 61,160 3,783 5,234
NSW Generations (Debt Retirement) Fund 16,142 -- 98 3,339
Restart NSW Fund 8,251 -- 201 1,581
Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer 20,285 22,070 5,318 5,857
Immaterial agencies 3,409 1,856 1,160 731
* Includes other gains.
** Includes other losses and taxes, if applicable.
*** This excludes funds within the TCorp Investment Management (IM) Funds of $75 billion, which are managed by TCorp as the trustee of the IM Funds.
# In October 2021, the Secretary of Treasury under appropriate delegation powers approved a proposal to restructure Port Botany Lessor Pty Limited, Port Kembla Lessor Pty Limited and Port of Newcastle Pty Limited (Port Lessor Companies) from their Proprietary Company status to a Ministerial Holding Corporation. This change took effect on 1 July 2022 and the assets, rights and liabilities of the Port Lessor Companies were transferred to the respective Port Lessor Ministerial Holding Corporations on this date.
Source: Agencies’ audited 2022–23 financial statements.

2.2 Quality of financial reporting

Audit opinions

Unqualified audit opinions were issued on all Treasury portfolio agencies’ financial statements

Unqualified audit opinions were issued on all portfolio agencies’ 30 June 2023 financial statements. Sufficient and appropriate audit evidence was obtained to conclude the financial statements were free of material misstatement.

Four ‘emphasis of matter’ paragraphs were included in the Independent Auditor’s Reports

An emphasis of matter paragraph, which does not modify the audit opinion, was included in each of the following Independent Auditor’s Reports:

  • TCorp IM Cash Fund
  • Energy Industries Superannuation Scheme Pool A (EISS Pool A)
  • Energy Industries Superannuation Scheme Pool B (EISS Pool B)
  • Energy Investment Fund.

Each emphasis of matter related to disclosure in these financial reports that these entities were prepared on a non-going concern basis as they are expected to be wound up within the next 12 months.

Unqualified audit opinions were issued on 22 of the 24 other engagements prepared by portfolio agencies (ie. non-general purpose financial reporting engagements), and two were issued with qualified audit opinions

Portfolio agencies prepared information for 24 engagements other than general purpose financial statements during 2022–23. These included:

  • 6 audits of special purpose financial reports of NSW Treasury administered funds
  • audits of TCorp’s description of controls with respect to their design and operating effectiveness over managed asset portfolios and investment management services, and of Commonwealth Guarantee Fee Forms
  • an audit on the NSW Fire Brigades Superannuation Pty Ltd’s compliance with requirements of the Australian Financial Services (AFS) Licence
  • audits of seven superannuation entities’ Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) forms and regulatory compliance requirements.

Qualified audit opinions were issued on the following administered funds:

  • Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Ausgrid (ERIC-A) Fund
  • Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Endeavour (ERIC-E) Fund.

Qualified audit opinions were issued as payments from these funds did not comply with the relevant legislation. The audits found instances where payments were made from the funds that were outside the scope of the approved expenditure. This is further discussed in Chapter 3 ‘Audit observations’.

Refer to Appendix five for further details about other engagements.

Identified monetary misstatements

The number of monetary misstatements identified during the audits of portfolio agencies’ financial statements increased from 29 in 2021–22 to 39 in 2022–23. A monetary misstatement is an error in amount recognised in the financial statements initially submitted for audit. In our view, misstatements should be corrected. They are reported to management for this purpose. Management has determined not to correct some errors because they are not material, either individually or in aggregate. These are reported in this report as ‘uncorrected misstatements’.

Reported corrected misstatements increased from 16 in 2021–22 to 25 with a gross value of $7.1 billion in 2022–23. Reported uncorrected misstatements increased from 13 in 2021–22 to 14 with a gross value of $277.6 million in 2022–23.

The table below shows the number and quantum of monetary misstatements for the past two years.

Year ended 30 June 2023 2022
  Corrected misstatements Uncorrected misstatements Corrected misstatements Uncorrected misstatements
Less than $50,000 -- 1 4 1
$50,000 to $249,999 3 1 2 3
$250,000 to $999,999

7

-- 3 2
$1 million to $4,999,999 5 8 1 3
$5 million and greater 10 4 6 4
Total number of misstatements 25 14 16 13
Source: Engagement Closing Reports issued by the Audit Office of New South Wales.

Refer to Appendix one for details of corrected and uncorrected monetary misstatements by agency.

Of the 25 corrected monetary misstatements, ten had a gross value of greater than $5 million and related to the following:

Agency

Description of corrected misstatements > $5 million

NSW Treasury

NSW Treasury understated its administered assets by $6.3 billion as it did not recognise the State’s equity investment in government-controlled entities in the Public Non-Financial Corporation (PNFC) and Public Financial Corporation (PFC) sectors as an administered equity investment. There was also an associated error of $114.5 billion corrected for the previous years. For further details refer to Section 2.4 ‘Key accounting issues’.

NSW Treasury

NSW Treasury overstated its accrual for the State’s coal pricing cap obligations by $31.4 million.

NSW Treasury

NSW Treasury corrected the classification of $6.1 million from accounts receivable, to accounts payable.

NSW Treasury

NSW Treasury incorrectly recognised $5 million of grant revenue prior to any cash being received.

Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Endeavour Energy and ERIC Epsilon Holdings Pty Ltd

ERIC Epsilon Holdings Pty Ltd overstated its assets by $170 million as it did not recognise an impairment adjustment resulting from the valuation of these assets.

The error was also then corrected in Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Endeavour Energy, which consolidates ERIC Epsilon Holdings Pty Ltd.

Insurance and Care NSW

Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer

During the year, icare entered into contracts with claim service providers to administer claims on its behalf. For one contract, the estimated remuneration payable by icare to the provider was overstated by $14 million. As icare recovers this contract fee from the Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer, icare’s service fee income was also overstated by $14 million.

Underwriting and other expenses within the Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer’s financial statements were also overstated by $14 million for this misstatement.

Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer

Premium income was overstated by $125 million in the Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer’s (the Nominal Insurer) financial statements due to an error in a model which icare used to estimate premium income. Management corrected the misstatement in the Nominal Insurer’s 2022–23 financial statements.

Refer to the ‘Audit Observations’ chapter for further details.

SAS Trustee Corporation – Pooled Fund

$281 million investments were incorrectly classified as receivables.

Of the 14 uncorrected monetary misstatements, four had a gross value of greater than $5 million, which comprise the following:

Agency Description of uncorrected misstatements > $5 million
NSW Treasury NSW Treasury overstated the Judges Pension Scheme (JPS) liability by $9 million due to historical salaries being incorrectly rolled forward for the 2022–23 provision calculation.
NSW Treasury NSW Treasury understated the Commonwealth Redress Scheme liability by $7.2 million relating to administration costs to settle the obligations arising under this Scheme which had not been included in the liability.
SAS Trustee Corporation – Pooled Fund Understatement of defined benefit member liabilities measured under AASB 1056 ‘Superannuation Entities’ by $200 million. This was due to an update of valuation assumptions including short-term inflation and salary increase rate provided by NSW Treasury post reporting period.
Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer NSW Treasury Corporation provided updated valuations of the Nominal Insurer’s investments in Investment Management Funds (IM Funds) after year end resulting in a $37.9 million adjustment. The IM Funds included exposures to level 3 investments, the valuations of which were not finalised until after the financial statements were submitted to the Audit Office.

In the instances highlighted above, the portfolio agencies concluded that the effects of not correcting the misstatements were immaterial, individually and in aggregate to their financial statements as a whole.

Sixty-five agencies were exempted from financial reporting in 2022–23

Part 3A, Division 2 of the Government Sector Finance Regulation 2018 (GSF Regulation) prescribes certain kinds of GSF agencies not to be a reporting GSF agency. For 2022–23, the following portfolio agencies have assessed and determined they met the reporting exemption criteria under the GSF Regulation, and therefore were not required to prepare annual financial statements:

Agencies GSF Regulation reference Basis for reporting exemption
Small agencies

Buroba Pty Ltd
Valley

Commerce Pty Ltd

Ministerial Holding Corporation

State Rail Authority Residual Holding Corporation

Port Asset Ministerial Holding Corporation

Port Botany Lessor Pty Ltd

Port Kembla Lessor Pty Ltd

Port of Newcastle Lessor Pty Ltd

Part 3A, Division 2, Clause 9D of the GSF Regulation

GSF Regulation prescribes a GSF agency meeting all the following requirements not to be a reporting GSF agency:

  • the assets, liabilities, income, expense, commitments and contingent liabilities of the agency are each less than $5 million
  • the total cash or cash equivalent held by the agency is less than $2.5 million
  • at least 95% of the agency’s income is derived from money paid out of the Consolidated Fund or money provided by other GSF agencies
  • the agency does not administer legislation for a minister by or under which members of the public are regulated.
Retained State interests

Thirty-two controlled entities of the Electricity Retained Interest Corporation –Ausgrid

Twenty-four controlled entities of the Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Endeavour Energy

Part 3A, Division 2, Clause 9G of the GSF Regulation

GSF Regulation prescribes a GSF agency meeting all the following requirements not to be a reporting GSF agency:

  • the sole purpose of the agency is to hold and manage retained State interests arising from a particular relevant transaction, and all of its activities relate to that purpose
  • the agency’s financial position and financial performance are consolidated within the financial statements of another GSF agency
  • both agencies have the same accountable authority.
Special purpose staff agencies
SAS Trustee Corporation Staff Agency Part 3A, Division 2, Clause 9F of the GSF Regulation GSF Regulation prescribes a GSF agency that comprises solely of persons who are employed to enable another particular GSF agency to exercise its function not to be a reporting GSF agency.

Matters around the effectiveness of the exemptions framework will be included in our State Finances 2023 NSW Auditor-General’s Report to Parliament.

Six Special Deposits Accounts (SDAs) were exempt from financial reporting in 2022–23

The new financial reporting provisions in section 7.8 of the GSF Act commenced on 1 July 2023 effective for the 2022–23 financial year. These provisions require responsible managers of SDAs to prepare financial reports for each SDA account in accordance with the Treasurer’s Directions and give those reports to the Auditor-General to audit unless they are exempted from reporting under a Treasurer’s Direction.

On 29 November 2023, NSW Treasury issued Treasurer’s Direction TD 23-24 ‘SDA Account financial reports’ which specifies the mandatory requirements for preparation of financial reports for SDAs in accordance with section 7.8(2) of the Government Sector Finance Act 2018 (GSF Act).

Under TD 23-24, SDAs are exempt from the requirement to prepare financial reports if they are:

  • consolidated into the financial report of another GSF agency
  • disclosed as an administered item by a GSF agency (per AASB 1050 Administered Items)
  • not controlled by the NSW Total State Sector
  • within the threshold limits set within TD 23-24, which include assets, liabilities, income, expenses and contingent liabilities of the SDA are each less than $5 million and total cash or cash equivalents are less than $2.5 million.

The following SDAs were exempt from financial reporting under TD 23-24 as they were administered (per AASB 1050 ‘Administered Items’) by NSW Treasury, and thus disclosed as an administered item, in NSW Treasury’s financial statements:

  • Snowy Hydro Legacy Fund established under the Snowy Hydro Legacy Fund Act 2018
  • Policyholders Protection Fund established as a SDA under the Insurance Protection Tax Act 2001
  • Electricity Network Residual Liabilities Fund
  • Crown Long Service Leave Pool SDA
  • Structure Finance Activities SDA
  • Confiscated Proceeds Account SDA.

While the following entities are exempt from financial reporting under TD 23-24, they are still required by their establishing legislation to prepare financial reports and have these audited by the Auditor-General:

  • Restart NSW Fund
  • Social and Affordable Housing NSW Fund
  • Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Ausgrid Fund
  • Electricity Retained Interest Corporation – Endeavour Fund
  • NSW Generations (Debt Retirement) Fund
  • NSW Generations (Community Services and Facilities) Fund.

Appendix five Acquittals and other opinions contains the details of the audits performed.

2.3 Timeliness of financial reporting

Early close procedures

Early close mandatory procedures were submitted on time

NSW Treasury introduced early close procedures to improve the quality and timeliness of year-end financial statements. In February 2023, NSW Treasury reissued Treasurer’s Direction TD19-02 ‘Mandatory Early Close as at 31 March each year’ (TD19-02) and reissued Treasury Policy and Guidelines TPG22-11 ‘Agency Direction for the 2022–23 Mandatory Early Close’. These pronouncements require the GSF agencies listed in Appendix A of TD19-02 to perform the mandatory early close procedures and provide the outcomes to the audit team by 27 April 2023. The 17 mandatory procedures are listed in Appendix two.

Portfolio agencies met the statutory deadline for submitting their 2022–23 early close financial statements and other mandatory procedures.

Energy Corporation of New South Wales needs to improve their completion of early close procedures

Energy Corporation of New South Wales did not complete all mandatory early close procedures:

Portfolio agencies Not completed Description of incomplete early close procedures
Other agencies listed in Appendix A of TD19-02
Energy Corporation of
New South Wales
2

Confirmation of inter and intra (cluster) agency transactions and balances

Management did not confirm all the inter and intra (cluster) agency transactions and balances for income and expense items.

Finalise assessment of all revenue contracts

Management did not complete their assessment of all significant revenue contracts.

Source: Reports on early close procedures 2023 issued by the Audit Office of New South Wales.

Year-end financial reporting

NSW Treasury required all agencies to submit their financial statements by 1 August 2023

In June 2023, NSW Treasury issued a suite of Treasurer’s Directions and Treasury Policy and Guidelines for 2022–23 financial reporting requirements and timetables:

  • Treasurer’s Direction TD21-02 ‘Mandatory Annual Returns to Treasury’ (TD21-02) and Treasury Policy and Guidelines TPG23-13 ‘Agency Direction for the 2022–23 Mandatory Annual Returns to Treasury’ require agencies listed in the Appendix A of TD21-02 to submit their 2022–23 financial statements to both NSW Treasury and the Audit Office by 1 August 2023
  • Treasury Policy and Guidelines TPG23-14 ‘Agency guidelines for the 2022–23 Mandatory Annual Returns to Treasury for New South Wales public sector agencies that are not included in TD21-02’ requires New South Wales public sector agencies not listed in Appendix A of TD21-02 to submit their draft 2022–23 financial statements to NSW Treasury by 1 August 2023.

NSW Treasury extended the year-end submission deadline for agencies to provide the note to the financial statements that provides disclosures on appropriations to 11 August 2023. The submission date for the rest of the financial statements (that is, excluding the appropriations disclosures) remained as 1 August 2023. The extension was granted under clause 7A of TD21-02.

Treasurer’s Direction TD21-03 ‘Submission of Annual GSF Financial Statements to the Auditor-General’ requires reporting GSF agencies that are not listed in Appendix A of TD21-02 to submit their annual financial statements for audit within six weeks after the year end.

Financial statements were submitted on time for all portfolio agencies

Portfolio agencies met the reporting deadlines for submitting their 2022–23 year-end financial statements. The Government Sector Audit Act 1983 does not specify the statutory deadline for issuing the audit reports. At the date of this report, the audits of all portfolio agencies’ financial statements have been completed.

The table in Appendix three shows the timeliness of the year-end financial reporting for portfolio agencies.

2.4 Key accounting issues

NSW Treasury related matters

Investments administered on behalf of the General Government Sector

NSW Treasury has previously contributed amounts to entities within the Public Non-Financial Corporation (PNFC) and Public Financial Corporation (PFC) sectors. These contributions were made on behalf of the General Government Sector (GGS).

In 2022–23, NSW Treasury reassessed the accounting requirements when administering transactions on behalf of the GGS, and concluded they were administering investments on behalf of the State. Previously, Treasury recognised these as either administered ‘distributions to owners’ directly in equity or administered capital grant expenditure. No administered investment asset was disclosed by Treasury for these contribution payments provided to government owned entities.

This resulted in the following adjustments to the financial statements:

  • $85.8 billion increase to administered investments at 1 July 2021, to reflect the State’s investment in the PNFC sectors and PFC sectors
  • $28.7 billion increase to administered assets and administered revenue at 30 June 2022, to reflect the increased value of the State's investment in the PFC and PNFC sectors.

Insurance related matters

The NSW Self Insurance Corporation's liability for abuse claims

At 30 June 2023, NSW Self Insurance Corporation (SiCorp) reported $2.3 billion in liabilities relating to abuse claims for unreported and reported claims – a $533 million or 31% increase from last year (2021–22: $1.7 billion).

Amendments to the Civil Liability Act 2002 removed restrictions to accessing compensation when the abuse occurred while a child was an offender in custody. Prior to these amendments, SiCorp received approximately 200 claims per annum related to abuse that occurred in a Juvenile Justice setting. In the 12 months to 31 March 2023 this increased to 776 claims.

The number of abuse claims in an education setting has also been increasing. In previous years, the number of education claims averaged less than 100 per year. In the 12 months to 31 March 2023, this increased to 483 claims.

The measurement of this liability for financial reporting purposes involves significant uncertainty and judgement, including estimating unreported claims that will emerge in the future. This means that the range of reasonable estimates for this liability is wider than usual.

Superannuation related matters

Financial statements for the Energy Investment Fund and the Energy Industries Superannuation Scheme Pool A and Pool B were prepared on a liquidation basis

The Energy Industries Superannuation Scheme Pty Limited, as trustee for Energy Industries Superannuation Scheme Pool A and Pool B, approved the transfer of all assets, liabilities, obligations and membership to the Construction and Building Unions Superannuation Fund (Cbus Super) effective from 11 May 2023. This transfer included the jointly held investments in the Energy Investment Fund. Cbus Super then redeemed all of its investment in the Energy Investment Fund on 20 June 2023.

Pool A and Pool B were wound up on 11 May 2023 and deregistered after submitting relevant information to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. The Energy Investment Fund was wound up on 20 June 2023. Accordingly, the financial statements for Pool A, Pool B and the Energy Investment Fund were prepared on a liquidation basis.

‘Emphasis of Matter’ paragraphs were included in the Independent Auditor’s Reports for the financial statements to draw users’ attention to management’s disclosures that the financial statements prepared on a liquidation basis.

2.5 Key financial statement risks

The table below details our specific audit coverage and response over key areas of financial statements risks that had the potential to impact the financial statements of significant portfolio agencies.

NSW Treasury

NSW Treasury leads the economic, jobs and investment conversation across New South Wales. From its position at the centre of government, NSW Treasury drives the economic development strategy to guide the State’s growth for the benefit of the people who live, work and study in New South Wales.

 

Key financial statement risk

Audit response
Significant Accounting Estimates
($53 billion)

NSW Treasury administers the following financially significant accounting estimates:

  • unfunded superannuation liabilities (2022–23: $41.6 billion)
  • employee provisions primarily for long service leave (2022–23: $10.1 billion)
  • provision for Commonwealth Redress Scheme (2022–23: $335 million)
  • States share of universities’ superannuation liabilities (2022–23: $988 million).

Our audit risk rating is higher due to the financial significance of these accounting estimates and the measurement of these requiring the use of significant judgements and assumptions (including actuarial valuations).

The audit procedures included:

  • obtaining an understanding of the processes and key controls in place supporting the defined benefit superannuation liability and long service leave liability calculations
  • evaluating the qualifications, competence and objectivity of actuarial experts
  • with the assistance of an actuarial specialist:
    • reviewed the appropriateness of the valuation methods and models used by management and management’s actuary to calculate the value of the liabilities
    • assessed the reasonableness of management’s judgements, key assumptions and reported values
  • considered the requirements of applicable Australian Accounting Standards (including those relating to financial statement disclosures), and industry practice.

Infrastructure NSW

Infrastructure New South Wales (INSW) was established in July 2011 as a statutory authority under the Infrastructure NSW Act 2011. It provides independent advice to help the government identify, prioritise project delivery, and oversee delivery of critical public infrastructure across New South Wales.

  Key financial statement risk Audit response
Property, plant and equipment $817 million Infrastructure NSW’s property, plant and equipment consists of land, infrastructure, plant and equipment and leasehold improvements, which are measured at fair value based on their current replacement cost. Our audit risk rating for property, plant and equipment is higher because these assets are proportionately significant to the financial statements of Infrastructure NSW, and are subject to management judgements and estimates when determining their fair values. These judgements and estimates often require the assistance of a qualified valuer upon revaluation.

Our audit procedures included:

  • testing the accuracy and completeness of the asset register
  • reviewing the appropriateness of the valuation approach
  • ensuring assumptions and judgments applied are reasonable
  • reviewing the accuracy of calculations that support the revaluation movements recorded in the financial statements
  • reviewing the presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the Australian Accounting Standards.

New South Wales Treasury Corporation (the corporation)

The corporation provides financial services for the NSW Government, public authorities and other public bodies of New South Wales.

  Key financial statement risk Audit response
Valuation of Financial Instruments – comprising
financial assets
$144 billion and financial
liabilities
$148 billion

Our audit risk rating is higher due to the:

  • significance of financial assets and financial liabilities in the balance sheet
  • impact small changes in inputs and assumptions can have on the fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities
  • significant judgements used to value offshore foreign currency borrowings where there is limited trading activity, and client loans are directly funded by these borrowings (Level 3 financial instruments).

Our audit procedures involved reviewing the valuation models applied to different categories of financial instruments and comparing key valuation inputs against independent market data (including the key inputs and assumptions management used for Level 3 financial instruments).

We tested the effectiveness of key operational and information technology controls supporting the valuation of financial instruments and reperformed fair value calculations for a selection of financial instruments.

We obtained external confirmations from counterparties at 30 June 2023, confirming the existence and completeness of amounts reported on balance sheet and evaluated the adequacy of financial statement disclosures against the requirements of applicable Australian Accounting Standards.

Insurance and Care NSW (icare)

icare provides services including staff and facilities for NSW Government managed insurance and compensation schemes. It also monitors the performance of the insurance or compensation schemes in respect of which it provides services.

  Key financial statement risk Audit response
Service fee
revenue of
$1.1 billion

Our audit risk rating is higher because costs are incurred by icare as the service entity of the statutory schemes it administers which are then subsequently recovered from the schemes through service fees.

Expenses are recognised by icare and then allocated to cost centres based on fixed percentages approved by cost centre owners. Some cost centres are fully allocated to a scheme if the goods or services directly relate to a scheme, or are based on an allocation model if related to multiple or all schemes.

The audit procedures included:

  • tested the design and implementation of key controls including the management’s approval of cost centre percentages applied
  • recalculated the cost allocated to each scheme
  • assessed the reasonableness of reported values and costs allocated to each scheme
  • considered the requirements of applicable Australian Accounting Standards.

NSW Self Insurance Corporation (SiCorp)

SiCorp has responsibility for the direction, control and management of a range of funds including the NSW Treasury Managed Fund.

  Key financial statement risk Audit response
Valuation
of claims
liability of $17.3 billion

Our audit risk rating is higher because:

  • the provision for outstanding claims is material to the financial statements
  • management with the assistance of specialist actuaries make significant judgements and assumptions as part of the valuation process, including the timing and value of expected future claims payments and related costs of settlement.

The audit procedures included:

  • with the assistance of an actuarial specialist:
    • evaluated the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the Corporation’s actuaries
    • gained an understanding of the work of the Corporation’s actuaries and evaluated the appropriateness of their work, including their models
    • assessed the valuation methods and approach used by the Corporation’s actuaries against the requirements of accounting standards and consistency with industry practice and the underlying claims exposure
      - assessed the assumption setting process, including data on the Corporation’s statutory obligations to policyholders/beneficiaries and claims payment information used as inputs into the valuation models
      - assessed the data used by the Corporations' actuaries to derive the economic assumptions particularly inflation
    • assessed the results of experience investigations carried out by the Corporation’s actuaries to determine how they inform the assumptions adopted, with specific emphasis on the trends in incidence and claim cost for psychological claims, child abuse claims, medical indemnity claims, medical discharge claims for New South Wales Police Force employees, incurred but not reported claims for events losses, and changes to the building cycle
      - performed an overall assessment of the valuation methodology, key assumptions and models used to derive the valuation of the outstanding claims liabilities
  • evaluated the judgement applied in recognising reinsurance recoveries
  • assessed the adequacy of the related financial statement disclosures against the requirements of applicable Australian Accounting Standards.
Outsourced
claims
activities

Our audit risk rating is higher because:

  • external claims managers are responsible for processing material transactions relating to claims and policyholder data which is used to value outstanding claims liabilities
  • an effective control environment is important in ensuring the completeness and accuracy of claims data.

The audit procedures included:

  • tested the reconciliation of annual claim manager returns to the Corporation’s financial reporting systems at 30 June 2023
  • performed additional audit procedures required by Australian Auditing Standard ASA 402 ‘Auditing Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service Organisation’, which included obtaining an understanding of relevant claim processes, testing key controls and reconciliations, and performing sample testing on key claim fields back to supporting evidence.

Lifetime Care and Support Authority of New South Wales (the authority)

The authority monitors the operation of the scheme which pays for treatment, rehabilitation and care for people severely injured in a motor accident in New South Wales.

  Key financial statement risk Audit response
Valuation of
outstanding
claims
liability of
$8.5 billion

Our audit risk rating is higher because:

  • the provision for outstanding claims for the Lifetime Care and Support scheme is material to the financial statements
  • management with the assistance of specialist actuaries make significant judgements and assumptions as part of the valuation process, including the timing and value of expected future claims payments.

The audit procedures included:

  • with the assistance of an actuarial specialist:
    • reviewed the appropriateness of the methods and valuation models used by management and management’s actuary to calculate the value of the outstanding claims liability
    • assessed the reasonableness of management’s judgements, key assumptions and reported values
  • considered the requirements of applicable Australian Accounting Standards (including those relating to financial statement disclosures), and industry practice.

Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (Nominal Insurer)

The Nominal Insurer operates as a licensed workers compensation insurer. The Nominal Insurer is not, and does not, represent New South Wales (the State) or any authority of the State. The scheme is not consolidated as part of the NSW Total State Sector Accounts. The Workers Compensation Act 1987 requires the Auditor-General to inspect and audit the accounts and records of financial transactions of, or relating to, the Nominal Insurer.

  Key financial statement risk Audit response
Valuation
of claims
liability of
$19.6 billion

Our audit risk is higher because:

  • the valuation involves significant judgement in determining the timing and value of expected future payments for claims incurred and related costs to settle the claims
  • the Scheme engages actuarial specialists to model and develop assumptions to estimate the outstanding claims liability
  • the level of judgement means that the valuation may change significantly and unexpectedly due to changes in assumptions.

The audit procedures included:

  • with the assistance of an actuarial specialist:
    • reviewed the appropriateness of the methods and valuation models used by management and management’s actuary to calculate the value of the outstanding claims liability
    • assessed the reasonableness of judgements, key assumptions and reported values
    • reviewed the results of the experience investigations carried out by the Scheme’s actuary, to determine how they inform the key assumptions adopted, with specific emphasis on the trends in incidence and cost for psychological related claims
  • assessed the adequacy of the related financial statement disclosures against the requirements of applicable Australian Accounting Standards.
Valuation of investments
of $3.3 billion
classified
under
level 3
of the
fair value
hierarchy

Our audit risk rating is higher because:

  • Level 3 investments require an additional level of judgement using non-observable market data and complex models which increase the subjectivity of the valuation
  • small changes in assumptions may significantly alter the valuation outcome.

The audit procedures included:

  • reviewed the relevant investment models (including their mathematical accuracy) and assumptions including, where appropriate, discount rates and terminal values
  • for unit trust investments, reviewed a sample of valuation statements and considered the capabilities and objectivity of the investment manager providing the valuation, as well as the pricing frequency and liquidity of trust units
  • assessed the adequacy of the related financial statement disclosures against the requirements of applicable Australian Accounting Standards.
Operation of information technology (IT) systems and controls Our audit risk rating is higher because the volume of transactions processed by the IT systems relies on effective IT controls for successful financial reporting.

The audit procedures included:

  • with the assistance of information technology audit specialists:
    • assessed critical IT controls in these systems, including access controls, data change controls and the business/accounting rules embedded in these systems
  • reviewed system and organisation control reports from the third party’s auditor on the design and operating effectiveness of controls, where technology services are provided by a third party
  • performed additional procedures on information sourced from IT systems where control design or effectiveness exceptions were identified.
Outsourced
claims
activities

Our audit risk rating is higher because:

  • external claims managers are responsible for a substantial component of the end-to-end claims management and payment process
  • an effective control environment is important in ensuring the completeness and accuracy of claims data used to value the outstanding claims liability.

The audit procedures included:

  • tested the key reconciliations performed by the claims managers, agreeing amounts back to the Nominal Insurer’s financial systems for 30 June 2023 and the claim database used by the scheme’s actuary
  • performed additional audit procedures required by Australian Auditing Standard ASA 402 ‘Auditing Considerations Relating to an Entity Using a Service Organisation’, which included obtaining an understanding of relevant claim processes, testing key controls and reconciliations, and performing sample testing on key claim fields back to supporting evidence.

SAS Trustee Corporation Pooled Fund (the fund)

The fund is the NSW Government’s largest defined benefit superannuation fund with over 85,000 members and $38.7 billion in assets at
30 June 2023.

  Key financial statement risk Audit response
Valuation
of unlisted
investment
assets of
$16.2 billion

Our audit risk rating is higher because:

  • the high level of judgement and estimation involved in the valuation approach, including determination of future cash flows, discount rates and other assumptions, with limited comparable market information available
  • complexities in applying the requirements of AASB 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’
  • financial significance of the assets valued which are a key driver of the fund’s net asset value and total return.

Key audit procedures included the following:

  • obtained an understanding of the Fund’s processes, policies and methodologies, including the use of industry specific measures for valuing unlisted investments
  • obtained independent valuation reports and compared assumptions applied to ranges for comparable infrastructure and property investments
  • tested the mathematical accuracy of the valuation models and consistency with the Fund’s documented methodology and assumptions
  • engaged valuation specialists, for those investments with higher risk characteristics, to:
    • assess the reasonableness of management’s judgements and valuation inputs against industry information/indices of comparable market transactions
    • determine whether the methodologies used to value the investments were consistent with methods commonly used by market participants for those types of investments
    • assess the competence, qualifications and objectivity of the external valuation experts used by the Trustee
  • obtained valuation statements provided by external investment managers in respect of unit trusts and hedge funds, and assessed the reliability of the information received
  • obtained independent assurance reports prepared for the existence and valuation of certain unitised investments
  • assessed the adequacy of the financial statement disclosures against the requirements of applicable Australian Accounting Standards.
Valuation
of defined
benefit
member
liabilities of
$60.6 billion

Our audit risk rating is higher due to:

  • the high level of judgement and estimation involved in the valuation approach, including determination of discount rates, Consumer Price Index, salary inflation, mortality and other assumptions
  • the financial significance of the member liabilities, which impact the estimate of required future contributions and investment returns to fund future outflows
  • the sensitivity of the defined benefit liabilities balance to small changes in any of the valuation inputs.

With the assistance of audit actuarial specialists, key audit procedures included the following:

  • assessed the effectiveness of key controls and processes over the:
    • accuracy and completeness of member data used in the valuation model
    • mathematical accuracy of the valuation model
  • assessed the reasonableness of the methodology, assumptions and judgement used by the Fund’s independent actuary in valuing the defined benefit liabilities, including comparison against accepted industry benchmarks and practices, and accounting standards
  • evaluated the competence of the Fund’s actuary by confirming they are appropriately qualified, experienced and registered with the Institute of Actuaries
  • assessed the adequacy of the financial statement disclosures against the requirements of applicable Australian Accounting Standards.

 

3. Audit observations

Appropriate financial controls help ensure the efficient and effective use of resources and administration of agency policies. They are essential for quality and timely decision-making.

This chapter outlines our observations and insights from our financial statement audits of agencies in the Treasury portfolio.

Section highlights

  • Five high-risk issues were reported in 2022–23. Three were new findings on contract management, accounting treatments for workers compensation renewal premium adjustments and the management and oversight of a Special Deposit Account.
  • A further 35 moderate risk findings were reported in 2022–23, of which ten were repeat findings.
  • Some agencies have again spent monies without an authorised delegation.
  • The quality of information provided for audit purposes needs to improve.

 

3.1 Findings reported to management

Twenty per cent of audit findings are repeat issues

Breakdowns and weaknesses in internal controls increase the risk of fraud and error. Deficiencies in internal controls, matters of governance interest and unresolved issues were reported to management and those charged with governance of agencies. The Audit Office does this through management letters, which include observations, related implications, recommendations and risk ratings.

In 2022–23, there were 69 findings raised across the portfolio (61 in 2021–22). Twenty per cent of all issues were repeat issues (30% in 2021–22).

A delay in implementing audit recommendations increases the risk of intentional and accidental errors in processing information, producing management reports and generating financial statements. This can impair decision-making, affect service delivery and expose agencies to fraud, financial loss and reputational damage. Poor controls may also mean agency staff are less likely to follow internal policies, inadvertently causing the agency not to comply with legislation, regulation and central agency policies.

2022–23 audits identified five high-risk findings

High-risk findings, including repeat findings, were reported at the following portfolio agencies.

Agency Description
Repeat findings from prior years
NSW Treasury

Lack of quality review of submissions for audit

NSW Treasury’s financial statements and supporting evidence submitted for audit included deficiencies that indicate a need to improve quality review processes. This high-risk issue is included in ‘Financial reporting’ below.

NSW Treasury

Monitoring and approval of administration costs incurred by Service NSW

Service NSW administered a range of economic stimulus and disaster recovery support programs, and some of the project agreements required the Secretary of NSW Treasury to sign-off the finalised costings and funding sources. NSW Treasury again failed to action this during the year, and Service NSW withdrew funds from the administered bank accounts for its administration costs, without any approval from the Secretary of NSW Treasury. This high-risk issue is included in ‘Internal control deficiencies or improvements’ below.

2022–23 new findings
NSW Treasury

Non-compliance with Restart NSW Fund (Restart) responsible manager requirements

Monies were paid from Restart to the Department of Education to fund a school renewal project. Of this amount, $20 million was a duplicate claim made by DoE in error in August 2021. Treasury only became aware of the duplicate claim when DoE advised of this in March 2023 when the project was terminated.

Section 4.16(1) of the Government Sector Finance Act 2018 (GSF Act) requires the Responsible Manager for an SDA account to keep records and other information that explain whether payments into and out of the Fund have been made in accordance with the Act, and allow for the preparation and audit of financial reports. This includes information about SDA monies being held by other agencies.

The responsible manager is unable to acquit their obligations under the Act when there is inadequate oversight and records of payments out of the Fund.

This high-risk issue is included in ‘Non-compliance with key legislation and/or central agency policies’ below.

Generator Property Management Pty Ltd

Contract management

There was insufficient evidence of contracts and agreements for items listed in the company’s contract register. While management provided some documentation to support their contractual rights and obligations, there was inadequate supporting information on the agreed scope of works which increases the risk that management will be unable to hold suppliers accountable to specific performance measures and obligations. This high-risk issue is included in ‘Governance and oversight’ below.

icare

Premium income overstated by $125 million

Premium income was overstated by $125 million in the Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer’s (the Nominal Insurer) financial statements due to an error in a model which icare used to estimate premium income. Management corrected the misstatement in the Nominal Insurer’s 2022–23 financial statements.

This matter has been included as a high-risk finding, as the exception was a corrected material misstatement that was not detected by icare’s internal controls.

Note: Management letter findings are based either on final management letters issued to agencies, or draft letters where findings have been agreed with management.

The table below describes the common issues identified across the portfolio by category and risk rating.

Risk rating Issue
Information technology

High: 0 new, 0 repeat1
Moderate: 2 new, 2 repeat2
Low: 7 new, 0 repeat3

The financial audits identified deficiencies in information technology processes and controls that support the integrity of financial data used to prepare agencies’ financial statements. This included issues associated with:

  • user access management, including untimely deactivation of terminated user accounts and reviews of access levels
  • outdated policies and standards
  • documentation and reporting of cyber security incidents.
Internal control deficiencies or improvements

High: 0 new, 1 repeat1
Moderate: 6 new, 4 repeat2
Low: 7 new, 1 repeat3

One repeat high-risk issue was identified relating to the monitoring and approval of administrated costs incurred by Service NSW. This is discussed at Section 3.1 above.

The financial audits identified other internal control deficiencies across key business processes, including:

  • untimely review of reconciliations
  • ineffective oversight of transactions processed by agencies’ service providers
  • ineffective bank user access review processes.
Financial reporting
High: 1 new, 1 repeat1
Moderate: 7 new, 1 repeat2
Low: 9 new, 1 repeat3

Two high-risk issues were identified relating to the need to improve the quality of information provided for audit purposes and incorrect estimates of premium income. These were discussed at Section 3.1 above.

The financial audits identified the need for agencies to strengthen financial reporting, including:

  • accounting for grant revenue
  • support and justification for significant judgements made
  • timely capitalisation and fair valuation of infrastructure assets.
Governance and oversight
High: 1 new, 0 repeat1
Moderate: 8 new, 0 repeat2
Low: 3 new, 0 repeat3

A high-risk issue was identified relating to a lack of formal contracts with suppliers. This was discussed in the table above.

The financial audits identified the need for agencies to improve governance and oversight processes, including:

  • guidance around the application of accounting standards
  • insufficient application of procurement requirements when engaging professional services
  • non-disclosure of information in key management personnel disclosures.
Non-compliance with key legislation and/or central agency policies
High: 1 new, 0 repeat1
Moderate: 3 new, 2 repeat2
Low: 0 new, 1 repeat3

A high-risk issue was identified relating to non-compliance with the requirements of responsible manager requirements for a Special Deposits Account (SDA). This was discussed in the table above.

The financial audits identified the need for agencies to improve compliance with key legislation and central agency policies, including:

  • having the appropriate delegations to incur expenditure
  • untimely reporting and disclosure of newly created agencies
  • the disclosure of contracts entered into.
High-risk from the consequence and/or likelihood of an event that has had, or may have a negative impact on the entity.
Moderate risk from the consequence and/or likelihood of an event that has had, or may have a negative impact on the entity.
3 Low risk from the consequence and/or likelihood of an event that has had, or may have a negative impact on the entity.
Note: Management letter findings are based either on final management letters issued to agencies, or draft letters where findings have been agreed with management.

The number of moderate risk findings has increased

Thirty-five moderate risk findings were reported in 2022–23 (31 in 2021–22). Of these, ten were repeat findings, and 25 were new issues. These included findings around internal control deficiencies, improvements to financial reporting, procurement, and conflicts of interest processes.

Recommendation

Portfolio agencies should prioritise and action recommendations to address internal control deficiencies. Focus should be given to addressing high risk and repeat issues.

NSW Treasury related matters

There was lack of guidance provided on new paid parental leave obligations to agencies

On 27 September 2022 the former Department of Premier and Cabinet issued a determination that provided for a change to the paid parental leave scheme (the scheme) for all NSW government employees with children born on or after 1 October 2022. This change expanded on previous parental leave entitlements and provided greater access to paid parental leave to eligible public sector employees.

Previously, paid parental leave was only available for the primary carer (14 weeks) after 40 weeks of continuous service and needed to be taken upfront after the birth of the child, whilst the support carer was entitled to two weeks. In these circumstances, a provision was never recognised as it was non-accumulating as the entitlement could not be carried forward to future periods. Under the new provisions, parents can take the full 14 weeks (with some employees eligible to receive an additional two weeks) and can do so across a two-year period subject to meeting eligibility criteria.

AASB 119 ‘Employee Benefits’ refers to the recognition of accumulating non-vesting obligations that increases their entitlement to paid absences in future time periods. This provides an obligation to the employers to provide for any unused parental leave.

The new parental leave policy impacted agencies across all portfolios and the recording of this liability across the sector would have been assisted by timely guidance to the sector on the financial reporting impacts. This caused late accounting assessments across all portfolios to assess whether the impact was material.

Recommendation

NSW Treasury should ensure any changes to employee entitlements are assessed for their potential financial statements impact under the relevant Australian Accounting Standards. Timely guidance should be provided to the sector.

Over $300 million of unsuccessful bid costs have been capitalised by Transport for NSW and Sydney Metro

At 30 June 2023, Transport for NSW and Sydney Metro have capitalised unsuccessful bid cost contributions totalling $158 million and $175 million respectively in their assets under construction. These costs represent payments made to unsuccessful bidders, reimbursing them for expenses incurred during the tender phase of a project – up to the appointment of the preferred bidder. These reimbursed costs include, but are not limited to:

  • design
  • technical modelling
  • legal advice
  • specialist reports required to develop a conforming bid.

The partial reimbursement of costs incurred by unsuccessful bidders is consistent with the NSW Treasury’s Bid Cost Contributions Policy, which sets out the arrangements for when and how it will make a financial contribution to unsuccessful bidders to partially reduce the cost of bidding for construction and infrastructure projects in New South Wales. While the policy provides clarity on the reimbursement of unsuccessful bidders’ costs, it does not contemplate how these costs should be recognised in agency’s financial statements, including whether they should be capitalised or expensed.

 
Recommendation

NSW Treasury should develop an accounting policy for the bid cost contributions, to ensure consistent application across the NSW government agencies. 

Non-compliance with legislation

During 2022–23, the Audit Office identified non-compliance with the Electricity Retained Interest Corporations Act 2015. Payments totalling $439 were made from the Electricity Retained Interest Corporation Fund - Endeavour (ERIC-E Fund) and $1,436 were made from the Electricity Retained Interest Corporation Fund – Ausgrid (ERIC-A Fund) that did not comply with section 34 of the Act. Section 34 of the Act specifies what payments can be made from the Fund.

Insurance related matters

Insurance and Care NSW (icare)

The Audit Office is currently performing a performance audit, which will assess the effectiveness and economy of icare’s management of workers compensation claims. It will also assess the effectiveness of SIRA’s oversight of workers compensation insurance.

The report is expected to be tabled in the first half of 2024.

 

Appendices

Appendix one – Misstatements in financial statements submitted for audit

Appendix two – Early close procedures

Appendix three – Timeliness of financial reporting

Appendix four – Financial data

Appendix five – Acquittals and other opinions

 

© Copyright reserved by the Audit Office of New South Wales. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without prior consent of the Audit Office of New South Wales. The Audit Office does not accept responsibility for loss or damage suffered by any person acting on or refraining from action as a result of any of this material.