The mental health and wellbeing of NSW police

Report snapshot

About this report

This report examined whether the NSW Police Force has been efficient and effective in managing and supporting the psychological wellbeing of the police workforce.

Findings

In 2023, the NSW Police Force funded a range of additional wellbeing initiatives to support police. In 2024, a standalone command was established to deliver these initiatives and manage the health and wellbeing of the workforce.

Over the five years from July 2019 to June 2024, the NSW Police Force had increasing numbers of psychological injury claims, escalating compensation costs, and increasing psychological injury medical exits. Since October 2024, there has been a reduction in the number of psychological injury notifications.

The NSW Police Force monitors and reports on psychological injuries to the workforce, but does not monitor, analyse or report on the root causes of these injuries. As a result, the NSW Police Force is not efficiently or effectively preventing future psychological injuries to the police workforce. Work is currently in progress to improve psychological risk reporting.

NSW Police Force wellbeing initiatives provide counselling and support for police after traumatic incidents. The initiatives do not address other psychological risk factors such as fatigue, role overload, or burnout.

Some police commands have higher workload volumes than others, and the NSW Police Force does not have a staffing allocation model to distribute police to locations under the greatest workload pressure.

In the five years from 2020 to 2025, the NSW Police Force invested $34 million on proactive wellbeing services for police, and an additional $60 million on the administrative costs of running the Health Safety and Wellbeing Command.

The cost of compensation for police psychological injuries amounted to approximately $1.75 billion from July 2019 to June 2024.

Recommendations

The NSW Police Force should, by July 2026:

  1. develop and implement a workforce allocation model that matches police numbers to command-level workload demands and changing workload levels
  2. fully implement the health and safety incident notification system and regularly report on the causal factors that lead to psychological incidents and injury claims
  3. investigate and report on the factors that contribute to police role overload and burnout, and adjust policy settings, practices and controls accordingly
  4. implement a strategy, process, and evaluation framework, that links police wellbeing initiatives and resources to evidence-based psychological risk factors.

Fast facts

1. Executive Summary

Context

The NSW Police Force is the largest law enforcement agency in Australia. As at June 2024, there were 16,262 sworn police officers and 4,295 civilian officers in the NSW Police Force. NSW Police serve a population of almost 8.5 million people across 801,600 square kilometres. Of the sworn police officers, approximately 12,000 are general duties frontline police who are the first responders to incident call-outs.

Under the NSW Work Health and Safety Act 2011, the NSW Police Force has a duty of care to its employees, as do all employers, to address health and safety risks, including psychosocial risks. The NSW Police Force must balance this duty of care with its mandate to reduce crime, maintain public safety and engage with diverse communities across the State. In the conduct of these duties, frontline police can be exposed to violence and trauma. For some police, this exposure is common. Police are called to incidents where there are higher levels of unpredictability than most other workplace environments. Within this context, they are required to make tactical decisions in very short timeframes.

Audit objective

The objective of the audit was to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the NSW Police Force in managing and supporting the psychological wellbeing of the police workforce.

The audit assessed whether the NSW Police Force:

  • has reliable information about the psychological stressors on the police workforce
  • provides appropriate support and resources for police personnel
  • continuously improves workplace support options that mitigate psychological risks and the likelihood of future injuries.

Conclusion

The NSW Police Force monitors and reports on psychological injuries to the workforce using broad classifications, but does not monitor, analyse or report on the root causes of these injuries. As a result, the NSW Police Force is not efficiently or effectively preventing future psychological injuries to the police workforce. While work is in progress to improve psychological risk reporting, at the time of this audit, the new reporting arrangements had not been implemented.

In 2023, the NSW Police Force introduced an expanded suite of wellbeing initiatives. Most initiatives were established in the absence of analysis of the factors that lead to police psychological injuries. The new initiatives provide counselling and support for police after traumatic incidents but do not address other psychological risk factors such as role overload, fatigue or burnout. There has been limited evaluation of initiative outcomes to date, and their effectiveness has not been determined. In the absence of data about the causes of psychological injury, or evaluations of wellbeing services, the NSW Police Force was unable to demonstrate the efficiency or effectiveness of its wellbeing investment. In 2024, the NSW Police Force established a command to manage and enhance police safety and wellbeing services, and while early signs are promising, initiatives are yet to be fully evaluated.

Over a five year timeframe, the NSW Police Force made a $34 million investment in proactive workforce wellbeing services in comparison to the cost of police psychological injuries at approximately $1.75 billion. Over the same timeframe, the NSW Police Force reports that it also spent approximately $60 million on costs associated with running the Health Safety and Wellbeing Command, including salaries, operational and administrative costs.

Police psychological injury claims have been trending upwards, consistent with trends seen across the wider NSW public sector. In 2023–2024, there were 1,208 new police psychological injury claims, significantly higher than the 790 new claims made during 2019–2020. However, since October 2024, there has been a reduction in the number of psychological injury notifications. While it is early to attribute this decline to a particular influence, it coincides with the introduction of the new police medical insurance and compensation arrangements – the Enhanced Police Support Scheme.

Key findings

In 2024 the NSW Police Force established a command to manage and enhance police safety and wellbeing services, and while early signs are promising, initiatives are yet to be fully evaluated

In 2023, the NSW Police Force expanded its suite of psychological wellbeing services for police. These new services were aimed at enhancing support and recovery opportunities for police after traumatic workplace incidents. Chief amongst these actions was the formation of the Health Safety and Wellbeing Command in 2024. The Command has a remit ‘to promote a safety-first culture, to proactively connect safety initiatives and wellbeing services to the NSW Police Force, and to offer recovery at work opportunities and support services to NSW police members. Prior to 2024, the NSW Police Force managed employee wellbeing through the Workforce Safety Command.

The new Health Safety and Wellbeing Command has overseen the rollout of a number of psychological support initiatives. New initiatives include the placement of 28 mental health clinicians in local area commands where they provide face-to-face services to frontline police. Mental health clinicians support police after adverse or traumatic incidents. Police told audit staff that they value the formal and informal interactions with clinicians, and the ability to debrief with a professional. While anecdotally, the new clinicians have been well-received, the NSW Police Force has yet to conduct an evaluation of this initiative in order to secure the future of the program.

NSW police employees have access to a range of other psychological services after exposure to traumatic workplace incidents. Support options include access to chaplains, nurses, family support officers, and psychologists. In addition, police have access to a treatment initiative that provides them with reimbursement of costs if they establish a mental health plan with their doctor. If police do not want to access clinical services or other counselling options, they are able to contact peer support officers for collegiate support.

In 2023, new funding made psychologist services potentially available to all NSW police on a self-referral basis. Up until 2023 however, psychologist services were not available to all police. Psychologists exclusively supported police from specialist, high-risk areas such as the sex crimes squad, the homicide squad, or the forensic services unit. Mandatory psychologist sessions continue to be provided to police in high-risk roles as a way to support these personnel at regular intervals.

While the wellbeing services create a range of new options for police psychological support, evaluation processes are preliminary. To date, the NSW Police Force has evaluated only one of the services amongst its wider suite of police wellbeing initiatives. This service provides routine psychological checks for specialist police in high-risk positions. The evaluation found increased psychological health literacy amongst services users.

According to the NSW Police Force, a full evaluation of the availability and quality of all wellbeing services will be conducted at a future time. However, at the time of this audit, evaluation processes were not progressed, and the NSW Police Force could not produce outcomes data.

The NSW Police Force monitors workforce psychological injury claim numbers and compensation costs, and reports show increasing injuries in the five years from 2019 to 2024

NSW Police Force managers receive information about workforce psychological injuries via quarterly health and safety data reports. These reports show the ten most common psychological injury types. In 2023–2024, the most common psychological injury was listed as ‘other mental stress factors’. The second most common injury was ‘exposure to workplace violence’, and the third was ‘work pressure’.

These categories provide generic information about workforce injuries. NSW Police Force managers require more detailed information to gain insight into the causes of police injuries. The current injury categories are set by Safe Work Australia for workers compensation claim purposes. There is potential for the NSW Police Force to improve information about the nature and causes of workforce psychological injury, as current data categories are insufficient to base the design of preventative measures.

Health and safety management reports show increasing numbers of police medical separations each year. In 2023–2024 there were 769 medical separations for psychological injuries, significantly higher than the 424 medical separations in 2019–2020.

The NSW Police Force has limited information about the causes of police psychological injuries, and could do more to align preventative measures with evidence that describes the risks

In the five years from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024, the NSW Police Force did not have information about the root causes of police psychological injuries at a workforce-wide level. While managers had access to detailed individual reports on police psychological injuries and incidents, they lacked workforce-level data that could potentially indicate themes or trends in the factors that contribute to, or cause psychological injuries. In 2024, the NSW Police Force recorded 1,208 new active psychological injury claims, indicating a need to thoroughly investigate the factors leading up to these injuries.

In mid-2025, the NSW Police Force will introduce a new incident notification system. The system includes a range of data fields that indicate the nature and cause of psychological injuries at the workforce-wide level. Once operational, the system has the potential to improve corporate knowledge about psychological injury risks. However, at the time of this audit, police managers lacked sufficient information to understand the ‘mechanism’ or cause of workforce psychological injuries. As a result, they have been unable to assess and compare the segments of the workforce under high stress and develop preventative measures that are based on evidence of risk levels. Understanding the causal factors of psychological stress and injury provides evidence that can be used to inform the design of targeted preventative measures.

In previous years, the NSW Police Force implemented initiatives without an understanding of workforce wellbeing risks. In 2022, the NSW Police Force introduced the Optional Disengagement Scheme which aimed to assist police to leave the workforce via voluntary redundancy. There is limited documentation about the intended objectives of the Scheme, although it was generally understood to be targeted at police who were adversely affected by the policing role. There is no evidence to suggest that the Scheme was successful in targeting police who may have otherwise taken medical leave. This is an example of a NSW Police Force initiative that was not matched to evidence of workforce risks.

A total of 679 police left the NSW Police Force with financial compensation through the Optional Disengagement Scheme. It is not known whether the Scheme resulted in the exits of police who were unfit or unsuited to the role. The medical separations data from 2022 to 2024 would indicate that the Scheme had no impact on medical separations. In fact, medical separations for psychological reasons continued to rise during this period. There has been no evaluation of the Scheme to date, and no specific links of the Scheme to data that could show risk prevention outcomes.

The NSW Police Force does not report on common factors or trends in police critical incidents or accidents, to understand whether psychological stress factors play a role

In the five years from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024, NSW police officers were involved in 171 critical incidents. Critical incidents are those that result in deaths or major injuries to police or the public after police vehicle pursuits, police collisions, or the discharge of police firearms.

After each critical incident, NSW police officers are required to complete a detailed incident form. As part of this task, they describe the risks, hazards, and other factors that were present during the incident. This information gives police managers insight into the factors present in individual events. While managers are well informed about each incident, they do not receive reports that show trends or patterns of risk factors that were present across multiple critical incidents. Therefore, police managers cannot see common themes or causes in these critical incidents over time. Reporting of this nature may indicate work design problems, or police practices that have higher levels of risk, and provide evidence on which to base remedial action.

The NSW Police Force does not produce reports about patterns or trends in non-fatal police accidents and incidents. Managers do not receive aggregated data reports on vehicle accidents, or health and safety incidents. This means they cannot see the factors that were potential contributors to these incidents. Analysis of this data may indicate psychological pressures on police, such as fatigue, work overload, or excessive haste. Managers require this form of data to assess whether policies, practices, or unmanageable workloads are leading to incidents.

As an employer, the NSW Police Force has obligations under the Work, Health and Safety Act 2011 (the Act) in NSW to identify health and safety risks to employees, and to take reasonable steps to minimise both physical and psychosocial risks. Section 27(5) of the Act describes the obligation for the NSW Police Force ‘to acquire and keep up-to-date knowledge of work health and safety matters’. Employers require information about the causal factors that lead to work health and safety incidents to understand emerging risks.

The NSW Police Force advises that its new incident notification system will improve reporting. Due to be operational in June 2025, the system aims to provide a greater level of detail about the types and causes of health and safety incidents, including hazards and near misses. The system has built-in, welfare response notifications that are matched to each workplace incident. At the time of this audit, the new system had not been implemented, and so it could not be evaluated as part of audit reporting.

The NSW Police Force introduced new services to support police after traumatic incidents, but in the absence of analysis into causes of psychological injury, services may not address all risks

In July 2023, the NSW Police Force introduced a five-year funding program of wellbeing initiatives aimed at supporting the psychological wellbeing of the workforce. The suite of initiatives includes a program known as PULSE. The focus of PULSE is to assist police after traumatic workplace experiences and to provide early intervention support for police who are starting to show signs of stress. As part of the PULSE program, 28 mental health clinicians were employed to support frontline police across the 57 police area commands, including police in specialist commands.

In 2023, NSW Police Force expanded its support and rehabilitation services for injured police, and for police wanting to engage in injury prevention activities. This program, known as RECON, assists police to return to work after injury, or to manage their injuries while in the workforce. It is available in two metropolitan sites in Sydney, and one regional site in Newcastle.

All police interviewed for this audit reported positively about the PULSE initiatives, claiming that the services increase their options for rehabilitation and support. However, it is not possible to determine the overall efficacy of the program, as it is yet to be evaluated. In addition, the PULSE wellbeing program was implemented in the absence of an evidence base or a rationale for the focus or design of the wellbeing initiatives.

While the PULSE program focuses on workforce support and recovery from traumatic experiences, the NSW Police Force is yet to address a wider range of psychological injury risks. In particular, the NSW Police Force has not assessed the risks of work pressure, fatigue, or burnout. These factors are cited as reasons for psychological injury in workers compensation claims.

The People Matter Employee Survey indicates that burnout is a significant risk factor for police. According to 2024 survey data, 31% of police report unfavourable levels of workplace stress, and 45% report being burnt out by their work. Across the wider NSW public sector workforce, workplace stress levels are self-reported at 23%, and burnout is at 39%. Twenty-four per cent of police report insufficient resources to support their wellbeing, and 19% were neutral on the issue. The NSW Police Force has not taken action to investigate or address these risks, despite these self-reported findings.

Some NSW police are routinely exposed to traumatic content. For example, police working in the Child Exploitation Internet Unit must review child abuse material in order to identify offenders. Unit managers have requested new technologies to assist their staff in identifying duplicate child abuse content (such as images or videos already viewed and categorised). The requested technologies will speed up review processes and minimise the number of times that personnel are exposed to content that has already been viewed. This may assist in reducing the risks of vicarious trauma.

Due to high workloads, personnel in the Child Exploitation Internet Unit are currently unable to follow safety protocols that limit the hours spent viewing child abuse materials. Since 2022-2023, the Child Exploitation Internet Unit has developed ten business cases to upgrade its technology systems. Some of the business cases are low-cost or cost neutral. Of the ten business cases, police managers have approved three, rejected four, and three business cases are still to be determined.

The NSW Police Force monitors police workloads across area commands, but cannot ensure the equitable placement of police personnel to locations under the highest workload demands

While police managers have access to data that indicates the commands with the highest workloads across the State, managers do not allocate workforce numbers based on an ongoing assessment of these workloads. As a result, some police commands have been managing higher workloads than others over time. These pressures are likely to create higher levels of fatigue and stress amongst some local police workforces.

Senior police managers advise that they do not have sufficient levers to move police employees to different locations, based purely on an assessment of changing workload volumes. While Deputy Commissioners and region-level commanders can monitor police workloads, they lack a staffing allocation model that would allow them to transfer police to commands under the highest levels of workload pressure.

‘Work pressure’ is the third most cited reason for police psychological injury in workers compensation claims. Segments of the frontline police workforce who were interviewed for this audit, advise that unmanageable workload pressures have the greatest impacts on their mental health and wellbeing.

NSW police managers do not receive reports to show potential correlations between workload levels and health and safety incidents. Data of this nature would indicate whether high workload volumes lead to other problems for police, including impacts on wellbeing. For example, it is not known if unmanageable workloads lead to higher numbers of mistakes by police, misconduct matters, or higher levels of burnout and psychological injury compensation claims.

Exhibit 1 shows the workload levels across the 57 NSW police area commands using data that assesses the ability of local police to respond to call-outs within the hour.

Map of NSW split up by local command boundaries. Map colour gradients are used to display and compare the workload demand of commands, by measuring average amount of calls for service that are unable to be attended within an hour.
Exhibit 1: Average number of call-outs that police were unable to attend within one hour in the month of November 2024

Source: Audit Office NSW analysis of NSW Police Force data.

The NSW Police Force lacks a workforce allocation model to assign police to commands according to workload levels, and as a result, some operate with higher workloads than others

The NSW Police Force does not use data-driven, workforce allocation formulae to distribute police personnel to locations according to workload demand. Instead, other factors have influenced the distribution of police across NSW. The current location of the police workforce has been largely determined by historical factors such as past election commitments, the identification of crime hotspots, and the allocation of new police graduates to area commands. Over the decades, police numbers have been increased in some commands in the absence of data-driven analyses of workload requirements. Once police personnel are placed in a particular region or command, it is uncommon for the NSW Police Force to move personnel, or adjust the local workforce headcount.

Each year, police managers make minimal changes to the distribution of police across the State. In general, the most common adjustment to workforce strength is made through the allocation of newly graduated police. Graduates are generally placed in locations where there are workforce shortages. In making these allocations, police managers must consider whether receiving commands have appropriately qualified senior officers to oversee the training of new Probationary Constables.

Workforce vacancy rates differ across commands. Vacancies can indicate areas where local police are under workload pressures. Some NSW police commands operate with vacancy rates of almost a third of their total staffing allocation, while others have vacancies at 11% of authorised headcount. However, vacancy rates are not a perfect indicator of local work demands. Ability to meet call-out volumes provides a clearer assessment of police workload demands. That said, the NSW Police Force has not done any analysis of its authorised workforce strength by command over the past eight years.

This lack of governance over staff workloads puts pressure on region-level commanders and local area commanders to manage localised workforce shortages. Region-level commanders must manage with local workforce numbers until they can make intermittent bids for additional workforce resources. In some commands, workforce fatigue and overload is much greater than in others. This risk is exacerbated by the fact that NSW police officers work some of the longest shifts of comparable law enforcement agencies in Australia. Most NSW general duties police complete 12-hour shifts, while police in the majority of other Australian states and territories work eight or ten-hour shifts.

Deputy Police Commissioners have the ultimate say on where new graduates are allocated. The rationale for graduate allocations is not communicated to region commanders with responsibility for managing local workforce resources.

The NSW Police Force has insufficient oversight of the impacts of secondary employment on police operational capability or wellbeing

General duties frontline police work 48 hours over four days. They typically work four 12-hour shifts over four days, with a mix of two day-shifts and two night-shifts. At the conclusion of the four shifts, frontline police have up to six days of leave. With an intense four-day work schedule, there is high likelihood that police are fatigued at the conclusion of the shift cycle. During the non-work days, police have periods where they are able to take up a second job if they choose.

While the problem of fatigue is an issue that is known anecdotally amongst NSW police employees, the NSW Police Force does not collect evidence to assess this risk. The police workforce has not been surveyed about fatigue, and managers lack other mechanisms to measure this risk.

Over the five years from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024, around 1,650 NSW Police Force employees were engaged in secondary employment annually. Central managers and policymakers do not monitor Statewide secondary employment levels across the 57 NSW local area commands. Information of this nature would provide corporate managers with opportunities to compare any impacts of secondary employment on police performance. For example, secondary employment data could be correlated with sick leave data or adverse incident data across commands.

Senior police managers advise that secondary employment is monitored at the local command level, and region-level commanders have oversight of this issue. While this provides some level of risk assurance, workforce-wide oversight is needed for effective assurance over risk levels. Central police managers require data that correlates trends in secondary employment, with data on police vehicle accidents, police performance concerns, or adverse safety incidents by command. If risk trends are identified through data analysis, central police managers can make policy adjustments that affect the wider workforce.

The NSW Police Force invested $34 million in specific initiatives that proactively support the wellbeing of its workforce, while the costs for police psychological injuries totalled $1.75 billion

Despite recent increases in mental health services and psychological support for police, the costs of psychological injuries have been increasing year on year. Based on the data provided by the NSW Police Force, over the five years from 2020 to 2025, approximately $34 million was expended on proactive wellbeing services for police. Over the same timeframe, the NSW Police Force reports that it spent approximately $60 million on costs associated with running the Health Safety and Wellbeing Command, including salaries, operational and administrative costs.

Costs associated with police psychological injuries amounted to approximately $1.75 billion over the five-years from 2019-2020 to 2023-2024. Police compensation claim numbers for psychological injuries occur at less than half the rate of physical injuries but cost significantly more. NSW Police Force employees made approximately 3,080 physical injury compensation claims each year over the five years, compared to a yearly average of 1,100 psychological injury claims. Over this timeframe, the cost of psychological injury claims accounted for 74% of compensation costs, with physical injury claims accounting for 26% of costs.

From 2019–2020 to 2023–2024, compensation costs for psychological injuries increased at a rate of almost 50% year on year. The upward trend in psychological injury costs is not exclusive to the police workforce. Increases in claims for psychological injury have been observed across the wider NSW public sector. However, due to the nature of police work, compensation numbers and costs for psychologically injured police are very high, totalling approximately $1.75 billion over the five-year timeframe. Some of the compensation claims costs are funded directly by the NSW Police Force, while other costs are funded by the State insurer, icare. In addition, the NSW Police Force purchases private insurance from TAL, and the private insurer covers some of the police injury compensation costs. Psychological injury payments to claimants can span a ten-year timeframe.

In the six months from October 2024 to March 2025, there has been a decline in the number of active psychological injury claims amongst police. This is the first decline in injury numbers in the past five years. There were 118 psychological injury notifications in the month of October 2024, and 78 new notifications in March 2025. While it is early to attribute this decline to a particular influence, it coincides with the introduction of the police medical insurance and compensation arrangements – the Enhanced Police Support Scheme.

The high costs of psychological injury are not only financial. Stress leave and sick leave absences impact on the police workforce capability and police workloads. These impacts are compounded by permanent exits from the workforce. In addition, there are personal costs to police as individuals, including a reduction in fitness for work, and adverse impacts on long-term health and wellbeing.

Donut chart showing the proportion of expenditure on police wellbeing measures ($34 million) compared to the costs associated with psychological injuries ($ approximately $1.75 billion)
Exhibit 2: Expenditure on proactive police wellbeing measures compared with costs of police psychological injuries (compensation and legal costs) over a five year period*

* Note: According to available data from the NSW Police Force, responsive costs data covers a five year period from 2019-2020 to 2023-2024 and preventative measures expenditure data covers a five year period from 2020 to 2025

Source: NSW Police Force expenditure data for PULSE initiatives, the EAP, police psychologists and legal matters. Psychological injury claim payment data (all payment groups) for icare workers compensation (Treasury Managed Fund) and for the Police Blue Ribbon Scheme (TAL).

Recommendations

By July 2026, the NSW Police Force should:

  1. develop and implement a responsive workforce allocation model that matches police numbers to command–level workload demands (call-out volumes and crime rates), and ensure that staff levels are regularly reviewed and revised according to changing workload levels
  2. fully implement the health and safety incident notification system and regularly report on the causal factors that lead to psychological incidents and injury claims in the police workforce
  3. investigate and report on the factors that contribute to police role overload and burnout, and use this information to adjust policy settings, practices, and controls
  4. implement a strategy, process, and evaluation framework that links police wellbeing initiatives and resources to evidence-based psychological risk factors.

 

2. Introduction

2.1. The NSW police workforce

In June 2024, there were 16,262 sworn police officers and 4,295 civilian staff in the NSW Police Force, making it the largest police force in Australia. The NSW Police Force serves a population of almost 8.5 million people across 801,600 square kilometres. Of the sworn police officers, approximately 12,000 are frontline police who are the first responders to incident call-outs.

The NSW Police Force is organised across six regions that are further segmented into police area commands in metropolitan areas, and police districts in rural and remote areas. There are a total of 57 police area commands and districts across NSW and 432 police stations.

2.2. Current state of wellbeing in the NSW police workforce

The NSW Police Force has a mandate to reduce crime, maintain public safety and engage with diverse communities across the State. In the conduct of these duties, frontline police can be exposed to violence, trauma, and volatile situations. For some police, this exposure is common. Police are called to incidents where there are higher levels of unpredictability than most other workplace environments, and they are required to make tactical decisions within very short timeframes.

According to the NSW Police Force Wellbeing Strategy 2020–2025, 73% of police officers report exposure to stressful events while at work. When asked whether they would be prepared to seek professional support, 79.9% indicated that they would prefer to deal with their problems by themselves or with family and friends rather than seek support from professionals.

2.3. Effects of psychological injury

Police are medically separating from the NSW Police Force at an increasing rate, with psychological injury claims rising year on year. The costs of workers compensation payments for psychological injury increased by 50% each year from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024.

As of 29 February 2024, there were 1,261 police employees on long-term sick leave with an active workers compensation claim for psychological injury. Of this figure, 536 employees reported ‘post-traumatic stress disorder’ as the nature of the injury. In 2023–2024, 28% of all police compensation claims were categorised as being of a psychological nature. These claims account for 74% of overall compensation claims costs for police injury. The increase in cost is due to the long-term nature of police psychological injuries, requiring sick leave payments over a longer timeframe than most physical injury claims.

The number and cost of police psychological injury claims have increased significantly since 2019–2020. There are more police entering the workers compensation scheme than leaving the scheme. Over the five years from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024, the number of police psychological claims rose from 790 to 1208, and the payments to these injured workers increased from $66.9 million to $323.06 million. For this five-year period, the total cost of psychological injury claims was $1.75 billion.

2.4. Police initiatives to support psychological wellbeing

In July 2023, the NSW Police Force allocated $79 million towards a five-year program focused on police health and wellbeing known as PULSE. The PULSE funds provide police with support and services until June 2028. As of February 2025, $16.3 million of the program funds had been expended. In combination with other NSW Police Force wellbeing services, including police psychologists and the Employee Assistance Program, the total NSW Police Force spend on proactive workforce wellbeing was $34 million. The PULSE initiative is aimed at improving police support and retention, and includes a range of services as follows:

  • 28 mental health clinician positions situated in police area commands and districts and specialist commands
  • an Early Access Treatment Initiative, where employees are reimbursed for services provided by a private psychologist
  • a rehabilitation program known as ‘RECON’ for employees to access physical and mental health support services, for rehabilitation or injury prevention purposes.

 

3. Police psychological wellbeing risks and mitigation strategies

A significant proportion of police report poor wellbeing in the People Matter Employee Survey, but managers do not have detailed information about workforce-wide stressors and risks

In 2024, 44% of police respondents to the People Matter Employee Survey reported unfavourable levels of wellbeing. The self-reported poor wellbeing of police included a reduced ability to function well in the role, and a lack of resources to manage wellbeing in the course of work duties. Other results from the People Matter Employee Survey show that the majority of police respondents do not believe they have support from managers to assist with wellbeing. While 44% of police reported low wellbeing in 2024, this is an improvement on 2023 levels, when 58% of police reported unfavourable wellbeing via the People Matter Employee Survey.

The People Matter Employee Survey is the only workforce-wide, self-reported source of information about police wellbeing risks. While the People Matter Employee Survey provides some insight into police wellbeing, it does not describe the nature, prevalence, or causes of psychological risk to employees. The NSW Police Force does not have an alternative means by which employees can report their psychological stressors, such as a workforce-wide survey.

The People Matter Employee Survey asks generalised questions about whether stress is manageable for the individual, whether employees are experiencing burnout, and whether employees are satisfied with the workplace practices that aim to manage wellbeing. In 2023 and 2024, more than 50% of police respondents recorded unfavourable responses to these three questions.

In the five years from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024, the NSW Police Force recorded an average of 1,100 psychological injury claims each year. Over this timeframe, the cost of psychological workers compensation claims accounted for 74% of total workers compensation claims costs, with physical injuries accounting for 26% of all costs. The psychological injury numbers recorded each year grew from 790 in 2019-2020 to just over 1,200 in 2023-2024.

In 2020, the NSW Police Force conducted a one-off, point-in-time survey, the ‘Mental Wellbeing Climate Survey’. It asked police about their experience and knowledge of existing wellbeing services. However, this survey did not ask police employees about their workplace stressors, or about their views on the nature or cause of psychological risks and injuries.

The NSW Police Force is in the early stages of meeting its obligation to understand workforce psychosocial risks, but needs to do more to understand risks associated with job demands

The NSW Police Force management reporting on psychological health and safety risks has not been sufficiently detailed to assist decision-makers to identify, address, and potentially mitigate risks to the workforce. Police management reports do not contain meaningful data on the causes of psychological injuries in the workforce.

While psychological injury rates were rising across the NSW police workforce, police management reports have lacked information about psychological injury types, or the causes of these injuries. For example, the most common psychological injury type was listed as ‘other mental stress factors’. The second most common psychological risk factor was described as ‘exposure to workplace or occupational violence’, and the third was ‘work pressure’. While these categories are set by Safe Work Australia, they are not sufficiently detailed for the NSW Police Force to understand its workforce risks.

The ten psychological injury categories are listed in order of their prevalence amongst the NSW police workforce are as follows:

  • other mental stress factors
  • exposure to workplace or occupational violence
  • work pressure
  • work related harassment and/or workplace bullying
  • exposure to a traumatic event
  • suicide or attempted suicide
  • other and multiple mechanisms of incident
  • mental stress related to Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)
  • being assaulted by a person or persons
  • other harassment.

From 2019 to 2024, the NSW Police Force had limited identifiers about the nature or causes of these ten risk categories, and no indication of the causes of psychological injury claims. This meant that the NSW Police Force lacked evidence on which to base its control measures, or to manage hazards.

Some of the data in health and safety reports is combined, so it is not possible to distinguish between physical or psychological injury types. For example, reports on the 1,307 injured workers who were unfit for work in June 2024, do not show differentiated data between psychological or physical injuries. Managers cannot see the proportion of 403 police who were deployed to other ‘suitable’ duties in June 2024, by those recovering from psychological injuries, compared to those with physical injuries. This means that managers lack evidence to plan rehabilitation services based on the level of requirement for different service types.

Reports show the impacts of injury on police over time, and the workforce attrition rates that are due to injury. While this data indicates overall impacts of police injury on workforce functioning, data does not show psychological and physical medical exits. In addition, reports do not show psychological medical exits by location or command. Specific data on injury type by location, may point to problem areas in different segments or locations of the workforce.

As an employer, the NSW Police Force has obligations to its employees under the Work, Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)

The Work, Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) (the Act) requires that employers identify health and safety risks and take reasonable steps to minimise both physical and psychosocial risks. Under Section 27(5) of the Act, ‘reasonable steps’ means that employers must ‘ensure … appropriate processes for receiving and considering information regarding incidents, hazards and risks and responding in a timely way to that information’.

NSW Police Force management reports on health and safety incidents show the number of incidents with psychological risk factors present. While these reports allow managers to track psychological injuries over time, information is not sufficiently detailed to indicate the causes of these injuries. Risks are not fully understood at the workforce-wide level, and so resources cannot be targeted to identified problems.

The NSW Police Force is also able to source information about workforce psychological hazards from individual risk reports made by police employees. The majority of these reports describe potential hazards to the physical safety of police, and in rare instances, psychological risks are reported to peer representatives. Reports are escalated to senior managers and provide some corporate insight into psychological health and safety risks.

Safe Work Australia has identified some of the contributing factors to workforce psychological risks. These include high job demands, excessive workloads, exposure to traumatic incidents or content, and long working hours without enough breaks. Excessive job demands become a psychosocial hazard when workload levels are unmanageable for prolonged periods. Other psychological risk factors include jobs with ‘high emotional demands’. The features of ‘high emotional demands’ have strong correlations with police work. They are:

  • exposure to aggression, violence, harassment or bullying
  • supporting people in distress (for example, giving bad news), or
  • displaying false emotions (for example, being friendly to difficult customers).

The NSW Police Force is implementing a new incident notification system that aims to improve incident investigation reporting on psychosocial risks and hazards

At the time of this audit’s publication in June 2025, the NSW Police Force is implementing a new incident notification reporting system. This system will provide a greater level of detail about the types and causes of psychological incidents, hazards and near misses. In addition, the new system has built-in welfare response notifications that are matched to the workplace incident.

In October 2022, amendments were made to NSW Work Health and Safety Regulations. These obligations imposed a higher standard for monitoring workforce psychosocial risks. They now require that employers introduce a range of control measures to mitigate psychosocial risks and hazards and to ‘eliminate psychosocial risks so far as is reasonably practicable’. The control measures are described in Section 55D (2) of the Regulations and include consideration of:

a) the design of work, including job demands and tasks, and

b) the systems of work, including how work is managed, organised and supported.

 

The NSW Police Force’s new incident notification reporting system has potential to improve the level of information about psychosocial risks and hazards, including information that shows the investigation stages and outcomes, and indicates the root causes of incidents and near misses.

At the time of this audit, NSW police employees are able to report their wellbeing concerns to line managers, but a number of frontline police advised that this course of action can be ‘career limiting’. Police employees are also able to speak with peer-appointed, work, health and safety officers. Work health and safety representatives have meetings with local police in their command on a monthly or quarterly basis, depending on the size of the command. During these meetings, work, health and safety officers record staff issues relating to trauma, psychological risks, and other wellbeing matters. The minutes from these meetings are escalated to senior human resource managers.

Frontline police are able to report individual health, safety and wellbeing concerns through an online ‘safe reporting’ portal. This online option is used to report local risks along with colleague misconduct concerns. However, this feedback portal was not well known by police interviewed for this audit. Those police that knew about the portal option, were concerned that feedback would not be anonymous, and could be traced back to individuals.

The NSW Police Force does not utilise information collected from critical incident reports to identify common psychological hazards that may contribute to these events

Police management reports do not include aggregated data about the factors that were evident in the lead up to critical incidents. Individual incident reports may include information about whether fatigue, stress, or excessive haste were evident when the incident occurred. Reporting on these factors in the aggregate, may reveal to managers, some potential risks, and the root causes of critical incidents.

The NSW Police Force correlates some command-level data about police accidents, work, health and safety incidents, but does not report on the factors that contributed to the psychological injury incident. This information should be visible to central managers and decision-makers who have the authority to direct resources to the areas where risks are identified. For example, managers need information to understand whether segments of the workforce are operating under workload pressures. These pressures can be indicated through workplace accidents and incidents.

In the five years from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024, NSW police officers were involved in 171 critical incidents. Critical incidents are incidents that result in deaths or serious injuries to the public and, or police. Critical incidents are those which occur as a result of police vehicle pursuits and collisions, or the discharge of police firearms. Police managers do not receive reports that might indicate common factors in these incidents – factors that may provide insight into workforce wellbeing and optimal functioning.

Police critical incident notification forms include fields for police to record the time in the shift when an incident occurred. However, police managers have not used this information to observe trends and patterns of incident times and risks. It means, for example, that police managers did not know if factors such as fatigue played a part in police critical incidents.

There is potential for the NSW Police Force to do more to understand the stressors on the workforce. Other employers have developed mechanisms to monitor risks. For example, health providers and hospital managers review and analyse clinical incident trend data. They use this information to identify system-level harms that indicate emerging risks to the workforce and the public, and take action at an organisational level.

Safe Work Australia identifies strategies to understand psychosocial pressures on the workforce. These include monitoring and observing workforce mistakes, as potential indicators of areas where job demands are too high. In addition, Safe Work Australia recommends workforce-wide consultation processes, including the use of surveys and tools to seek the views of workers on a wide range of psychosocial risks.

Ultimately, the NSW Police Force lacks systems to understand and report on structural risks to the workforce. This level of information would allow managers to review policies if necessary, and target resources to mitigate these risks.

 

4. Workload burden and fatigue

The NSW Police Force does not use a workforce allocation model to distribute its workforce according to workload burden

Workload stress is a significant factor in police wellbeing. The frontline police who were interviewed for this audit, were consistent in the view that unmanageable workload pressures have the greatest impact on their wellbeing. 'Work pressure' is the third most common source of psychological injury cited in police injury notification data. While police managers have information about the police workload pressures across commands, they do not use a workforce allocation model to allocate workforce resources in a way that effectively mitigates this risk. In general, police managers measure workload pressures by assessing the number of calls that local police are unable to attend within the hour across the 57 NSW local area commands.

The NSW Police Force lacks a formula to allocate and distribute its police workforce across commands. The location of police across the State has been largely determined by historical factors, such as the location of an existing workforce. Staffing levels are also determined by political decisions. Some staffing allocations are made via election commitments to place additional police in certain regions, without an analysis of workforce requirements.

The NSW Police Force has been operating with significant workforce shortages since 2023. Workforce vacancy rates differ across commands. Some police area commands and districts are operating with workforce vacancies of more than 30%. Others have lower workforce vacancy rates at 11%. While workforce vacancies are not always a true indicator of workload burden, the data can show commands under changing workforce pressures. The ability of a command to meet its call-out volumes provides a clearer assessment of workload demand. That said, the NSW Police Force has not done any analysis of its authorised workforce strength by command over the past eight years.

Each year, police managers can make minimal changes to the distribution of police across the State. This is almost exclusively through the placement of newly graduated police. The process for placing new probationary constables is determined via annual meetings with Deputy Police Commissioners and region-level commanders. During this process, police workload levels and vacancy rates are assessed, and region-level bids are made for new graduates based on regional needs.

The NSW Police Force does not use a staffing allocation model to distribute its personnel based on an assessment of the workloads of each command. While police managers have access to data that shows the areas experiencing the highest workload across the 57 NSW local area commands, they are limited in their ability to change the workforce levels across the State.

In instances where there are significant increases in crime or call-out rates, the NSW Police Force is able to temporarily deploy additional police as part of a surge capability. These deployments seek to surge police in crime hotspots. However, they are a temporary measure and do not solve entrenched under-resourcing of some commands.

Senior police managers advise that they are limited in their ability to transfer police positions, or to increase the overall workforce headcount to respond to workload demands. While Deputy Commissioners and region-level commanders can monitor police workloads, they lack a staffing allocation model that would allow them to transfer police to commands under the highest levels of workload pressure.

The NSW Police Force does not assess or compare the effects of police taking up a second job to determine whether secondary employment impacts on police fatigue, stress or performance

Over the past five years, around 1,650 NSW Police Force employees were engaged in secondary employment annually. Central managers and policy makers do not receive data or reports that would allow them to monitor and compare levels of secondary employment across commands, and its impacts on police performance.

Police managers do not receive data that correlates secondary employment levels with sick leave data or adverse incident data, for example. While police managers advise that secondary employment is monitored at the local command level, there is no capability to assess impacts centrally, and make policy adjustments if data shows impacts on workforce wellbeing or functioning.

Given that the NSW Police Force has not collected or analysed system-level, psychological risk factor information, managers are unable to inform the design of police wellbeing programs based on evidence of workforce needs.

NSW frontline police work some of the longest shifts in the country and the NSW Police Force has not sufficiently assessed the risks or impacts of this shift cycle on performance and fatigue

Frontline police complete four 12-hour shifts that are condensed into a four-day timeframe, followed by six days off. In general, frontline police complete two day-shifts followed by two night-shifts, that are completed consecutively. Police are required to have a ten-hour break in between shifts, but unplanned overtime and travel to and from the workplace and home, can reduce the time available for rest and recovery.

The NSW Police Force has a 'flexible work arrangements manual' with principles that allow for flexible rostering of shift lengths between six and 12 hours throughout the day and overnight. In practice, however, rostering patterns show that 96% of general duties police undertake shift lengths of 12 hours. Most other police jurisdictions in Australia, with the exception of the Northern Territory, implement shift lengths that vary between eight and ten hours.

The NSW Police Force does not analyse its incident notification reports to assess whether there are any trends in the times when adverse incidents occur. The NSW Police Force is not able to identify correlations between the length of shifts and incidents, or the patterns of shifts and adverse incidents. As a result, police managers do not know whether the current shift arrangements for frontline police are a contributing factor to fatigue and stress. They do not have trend data to show if fatigue is leading to increases in accidents, incidents and performance matters.

The NSW Police Force’s work readiness framework advises that a 'review of workplace incident data' is a method that can be used to identify factors contributing to fatigue. Aggregated data about the ‘time in shift’ when incidents occur, would assist managers to understand whether shift patterns have inherent safety risks.

The NSW Police Force does not have sufficient controls and tools to regulate the number of hours worked by police, and potentially mitigate police fatigue levels

The NSW Police Force currently manages fatigue through a work readiness framework that includes policies, guidelines and tools, that are designed to assist managers and employees to develop and implement work readiness management plans and strategies. Police commanders are not mandated to implement these guidelines and tools, and there is no register of police working hours or work readiness.

The framework does not address the ways in which the fatigue assessment tools will be used and monitored across local commands. The NSW Police Force does not have a process to ensure the implementation of tools and control measures. In addition, the fatigue assessment tools lack clarity or guidance on rest and stop-work directives. Some employers of emergency service workers and first responders are able to proactively monitor fatigue. For example, NSW Ambulance has an automated fatigue management calculator that allows managers to view the hours worked by employees in real time, in order to manage risks.

The NSW Police Force work readiness framework contains guidelines that can be used to mitigate some of the contributing factors to fatigue. Guidelines advise police managers to conduct 'consultation with workers'. However, there is limited evidence that the NSW Police Force has consulted with, or sought feedback from the workforce on fatigue risks. There is no evidence that police employees have been surveyed about the effects of shift hours on the available time for sleep, or on work readiness.

In October 2023, the NSW Police Force developed a risk control ‘ready reckoner’ which includes ‘fatigue’ as a risk factor in police work. This risk control system is still in draft form and has yet to be implemented. The register identifies potential controls that can be used to manage fatigue, but it does not assign owners or business areas as responsible for the controls and risks. The impact of the ready reckoner is not yet known, nor has there been any monitoring of its uptake to date.

SafeWork NSW has identified fatigue as a potential workforce health and safety hazard for employees across all industries. Fatigue has both physical and psychological impacts. According to the regulator, each employer has responsibility to identify and manage fatigue risks to employees. In recent decades, numerous supreme court decisions have found employers liable for breaching their duty of care in failing to take reasonable steps to minimise the risks of fatigue to their workers.

SafeWork NSW recommends that employers develop a fatigue policy in consultation with their employees. The policy should define clear roles and responsibilities for employers that include the management of excessive working hours, workplace assessments of fatigued workers to gauge fitness for work, and procedures for reporting hazards and managing risks.

 

5. Changing job demands and workforce attrition

5.1. The changing nature of police work

Frontline police are experiencing stress due to high administrative workloads, and the NSW Police Force has commenced some preliminary work to address the administrative burden

The workload levels of general duties police have increased significantly since 2022. Workload demand data indicates that police call-out volumes have increased each year since 2022. Police must attend 100% of call-outs to meet a ‘first response agreement’. First response agreements specify the minimum number of police that are required to respond to calls for service to meet community requirements. These minimum police workforce requirements are negotiated between the Police Association and local police commands.

In all of the local commands where police were interviewed for this audit, frontline police advised that the primary cause of their workplace stress was high workloads, exacerbated by staffing shortages. Those frontline police who disclosed poor wellbeing, described a correlation between their mental health and the number of jobs on their dashboards as they begin each new shift.

Many of the junior police interviewed for this audit, reported that they attend the police station on their days off, or stay back at the end of shifts, to complete administrative tasks. At some busy metropolitan stations, junior police advised that they are expected to arrive an hour before their official rostered start time, and may be expected to stay back for up to an hour after their rostered end time without additional payment. This amounts to additional hours before and after a 12-hour shift. Police report that they are unable to effectively take a ten-hour break between shifts. With travel time, to and from the station, along with unpaid overtime, they are in a continuous cycle of fatigue.

Over the years, the police have increasingly been involved in welfare checks and other community health service activities due to shortages in staffing in these areas. Police advise that they spend many hours at hospitals with patients in mental health crises and this is removing them from core duties.

NSW Police managers do not calculate the time that frontline police spend on administrative tasks in relation to time spent on active call-out duties. According to most of the frontline police who were interviewed for this audit, administrative workloads are onerous, and some tasks would be better handled by unsworn administrative personnel. This includes the preparation and serving of court documents. Efficiencies in this area could free up police to respond to call-outs.

The nature of police work has expanded in recent decades, and police managers are in preliminary stages of defining core police functions and reducing tasks outside their mandate

Frontline police are increasingly involved in non-core police work, such as welfare checks on people of concern, or the transport of mental health patients to emergency departments. Frontline police report that the expansion to their role is adding psychological pressures on the workforce. In 2019–2020, NSW police officers were engaged in 216,430 welfare and mental health support call-outs, and in 2023–2024 this number increased to 265,430.

Frontline police report that they have an increasing role in other tasks that are outside their core function, such as escorting people to hospitals, supporting NSW ambulance staff in call-outs, and transporting people to and from prisons. Frontline police and their managers told audit staff that this work is not part of the core police function and results in an increased workload and possible burnout.

The NSW Police Force has not done enough to demarcate its core roles and functions from those of partner agencies such as health providers, corrective services or mental health service providers. In addition, the NSW Police Force has been slow to work with partner agencies to form agreements so that relevant organisations can take ownership of their duties that fall outside the areas of police responsibility.

Many frontline police that were interviewed for this audit, voiced frustration over the extra tasks, including additional time spent collecting data for other agencies, such as child protection services. Police argue that they spend time on these ‘non-core duties’ rather than preventing and responding to crime.

Work to remediate the expanded workload of frontline police has been slow. For example, in 2018 the NSW Police Force piloted a program aimed at reducing the burden of mental health work on frontline police. This program continues in a trial phase, diverting welfare check tasks to mental health clinicians rather than police. The program has been trialled in 12 local commands and at this stage there is no confirmation that it will be expanded to other commands.

The NSW Police Force cannot confirm that the program will be continued into the future, advising that they are working with NSW Health on a working group to create a better program model to ‘free up police time’. They advise that an updated memorandum of understanding with NSW Health is expected to be signed later in 2025.

In 2022, the NSW Police Force set up a Transformation Office to coordinate and progress a number of change management programs across the organisation. One project was established to reduce the administrative burden on frontline police, for example. There has been limited action in the three years to trial or implement any proposed solutions. In February 2025, the Transformation Office personnel presented a number of administrative solutions to the NSW police executive team.

A second Transformation Office project aimed to clarify and define the core roles and duties of frontline police. There are four stages to the project and first stage is underway as of April 2025. However, the success of the project rests on interdependencies with multiple stakeholders, including commitment from police managers, along with agreements and memoranda of understanding with external agencies. NSW Police managers advise that the project is scheduled to be delivered in early 2026.

5.2. Workforce shortages and attrition

More than half of the police officers who leave the workforce, leave via medical separation

In 2023–2024, approximately 4.5 per cent of all sworn police officers exited the workforce for medical reasons. The vast majority of these medical exits were for psychological reasons (93% on average) each year from July 2019 to June 2024. This form of police workforce attrition outnumbers any other form of workforce exit, including resignation and retirement.

Psychological injury exits far outnumber physical injury exits. From July 2019 to June 2024, a total of 2,495 police officers medically separated from the NSW Police Force, with 2,348 of these being due to psychological injury. For this five-year period, the average yearly increase in psychological injury medical exits was 26%, compared to a zero per cent increase for physical injury medical exits. Exhibit 3 shows a yearly breakdown of police officer medical separations for physical and psychological injuries. This data was obtained as part of a special audit office request and is not routinely reported in police health and safety reports.

Exhibit 3: numbers of police officer medical separations by category, financial years 2019 to 2024
Financial YearPhysical injury medical separationPsychological injury medical separationTotal
2019–202030302332
2020–202129334363
2021–202233438471
2022–202326518544
2023–202429756785

Source: Audit Office analysis of NSW Police Force data.

Exhibit 4 shows the number of police officers who exited the NSW Police Force by type of exit, for the five-year audit period. The exhibit displays all categories of attrition, with the main ones being medical separations (psychological injury), resignations, and exits via the Optional Disengagement Scheme.

Line graph displaying the NSW Police Force’s attrition numbers by category, recorded over the past five financial years. Psychological injury medical separations are the highest, followed by resignations, and the Optional Disengagement Scheme.
Exhibit 4: Numbers of police exits from the workforce – all reasons, financial years 2019 to 2024

Police are under pressure to meet crime reduction targets even though the NSW Police Force is operating with significant workforce shortages

Police managers have a number of performance requirements, including an expectation that they will work towards meeting crime reduction targets. Some of these targets and drivers can be at odds with employee wellbeing. For example, region commanders may be driven to meet crime reduction targets, while frontline police are struggling with unmanageable workloads. Frontline police in commands with acute workforce shortages, told the audit team that they have limited options to anonymously report these workload risks to central managers.

In 2024–2025 the NSW Police Force was operating with significant workforce shortages. While the NSW Police Force reports an overall workforce vacancy rate of 11%, this does not give the full picture of workforce shortages. Long-term sick leave also impacts on police operational capacity, and in 2023–2024, 7.3% of police officers were on long-term sick leave.

Some police local area commands and districts are operating with significant workforce vacancy rates, which means remaining officers are likely to have higher workloads. Due to shortages in staffing, police in small regional stations are undertaking single-person patrols and call-outs, potentially exposing them to higher risk levels.

In one police district (Orana Mid-Western), there were a total of 243 authorised staff positions, with 47 of these positions being vacant in November 2024. When long-term sick leave and other leave types are added to these vacancies, the operational capacity of Orana Mid-Western district was at 70%. Some smaller police stations in this largely rural district have 50% headcount and other stations have no police personnel. In comparison, some outer metropolitan commands have an operational capacity of 83%.

Prior to 2019, the NSW Police Force reported on its operational capacity each month by comparing actual workforce levels against authorised strength in each command. A 90% operational capacity target was set, and police managers assessed workforce capability using this benchmark. However, since 2019, the NSW Police Force has not reported against the 90% operational capacity target.

Police working in commands with greatly reduced operational capacity are still expected to meet performance targets.

Exhibit 5 shows the level of police workforce shortages across the 57 NSW police commands. It shows that workforce shortage rates differ across commands.

Map of NSW split up by local command boundaries. Map colour gradients are used to display and compare the workforce shortage rate of each command, which has been measured by calculating the amount of vacancies and long term sick leave, as a percentage of authorised strength.
Exhibit 5: Workforce shortages by command, for the month of June 2024

Source: Audit Office NSW analysis of NSW Police Force vacancies and long-term sick leave datasets.

Workforce shortages impact on many aspects of police work and morale, including opportunities for police to train, to be promoted to new positions, or to engage in crime-prevention police work

Many local commands are unable to undertake proactive, crime-prevention police work as a result of staff shortages. Under the first response agreement that is negotiated with the Police Association, local commands are required to be adequately staffed to enable a response to 100% of call-outs. To meet these requirements in the current state of workforce shortages, proactive policing units are being recalled to general duties positions in order to cover reactive call-out work. This means local commands lose their ability to proactively address and follow up on crime. Police advise that this is impacting on their morale, as they respond to repeated events involving known offenders, rather than proactively visiting those known to pose a risk to community safety.

Staffing shortages have also reduced opportunities for police to attend non-mandatory training in commands with high workloads and low operational capacity. A lack of access to training ultimately limits the ability of general duties police to be promoted, as attendance at training is considered during the merit selection process. Police interviewed for this audit advise that they are ‘stuck’ in their frontline policing role for years and transfers out are increasingly difficult.

Some police advise that workforce shortages are impacting on their ability to take annual leave at holiday times, creating stress for police with family responsibilities. This has had negative impacts on workforce morale.

 

6. Initiatives to improve wellbeing

6.1. Workforce supply and demand initiatives

Recent workforce recruitment processes, training and onboarding processes have been improved to prepare student police officers for the nature and stressors of the policing role

Recent changes to the NSW Police Force’s recruitment and onboarding processes have been designed to improve the preparation of NSW police for the psychological rigours of the role. This includes preparing police trainees for the wellbeing risks that are part of police work. The NSW Police Force uses psychometric testing to screen applicants for psychological suitability, and follows up with an interview between the applicant and a police psychologist if required.

The NSW Police Force provides mandatory technical, academic and physical training to all student police officers at the Police Academy. However, for most of the audit period, these trainees were provided with limited or no exposure to actual frontline policing before commencing as general duties probationary constables.

In March 2024, the NSW Police Force reintroduced a police officer shadowing initiative whereby police trainees complete four shifts spread over two weeks as part of their early training curriculum. This initiative aims to provide trainees with exposure to the realities of police work before commencing in the role. Some police who were interviewed for this audit, advised that four shifts is not enough time to gain a realistic understanding of policing. Prior to 2020, trainees spent up to four weeks in police commands before completing their Academy training. This exposure provided trainees with more time to develop their understanding of the rigors of policing work, including the administrative requirements of the job.

NSW Police introduced a scheme aimed at reducing medical separations, instead, it resulted in police exits during a time of increasing workforce shortages, and had no known benefits

In 2022, the NSW Police Force introduced a voluntary redundancy initiative known as the Optional Disengagement Scheme. The NSW Police Force has no documentation about the objectives or the intended benefits of the Scheme. Police managers advise that the Scheme was designed to limit the number of police taking medical leave. According to senior police, the Scheme aimed to assist police to exit the workforce if they were disengaged or adversely affected by the policing role.

The Optional Disengagement Scheme was funded over three financial years, from January 2022 to June 2024. It allowed 679 police to leave the NSW Police Force with financial compensation. It is not known whether the Scheme resulted in workforce exits of police who were unfit or unsuited to the role. There has been no evaluation of the Scheme to date, and no indication as to whether the Scheme reduced the risks or impacts associated with psychological injuries. The medical separations data from 2022 to 2024 indicates that the Scheme had no impact on minimising the number of medical separations. In fact, psychological medical separations increased during these years, from a total of 438 in 2021–2022, to 518 separations in the following year, and 756 psychological medical separations in 2023–2024.

The Scheme resulted in 16% of all police workforce exits in 2022 to 2024. All of the police exits were of sworn police officers, and the majority were at the senior constable rank. The Scheme cost $138.25 million in total, with an average payout of $203,614 to the 679 individuals who permanently left NSW police work.

Eligibility criteria for the Scheme, required police to have at least ten years of continuous tenure before they could apply. Of those police receiving payouts from the Optional Disengagement Scheme, approximately 53% had completed between ten and 24 years of service. Generally, these were police aged in their 30s to mid-40s, with 96% at senior constable or sergeant rank. This means they were most likely to be active police performing frontline general duties work, detectives, or specialist police doing forensic work, or sex crimes investigation work. These are police workforce areas with high levels of workforce vacancy in 2024–2025.

There has been no assessment of the efficacy of this Scheme. Ultimately, it resulted in a financial burden on the NSW Police Force budget, in conjunction with a reduction in police numbers at a time when there were emerging workforce shortages. The Scheme contributed in part to the current scale of the workforce shortage problem.

The Optional Disengagement Scheme is an example of an initiative that was not matched to workforce risks. The inefficiencies of the Scheme are due in part to a lack of police data about the reasons that police take psychological stress leave. In addition, police managers lack data about the causes of psychological injuries to the workforce, including medical separations. A lack of understanding about the causal factors of police psychological stress and injuries means that police managers are not enabled to design and implement preventative measures that target workforce risks.

6.2. Wellbeing initiatives

Wellbeing initiatives have been well received by the police workforce as they increase the range of support options after traumatic or stressful events

In 2023, the NSW Police Force commenced work to address workforce wellbeing risks and improve workforce retention. The NSW Police Force allocated $79 million to a suite of police wellbeing initiatives known as the PULSE program. The $79 million PULSE budget spans a five-year timeframe. It constitutes a small proportion of the NSW police budget. In the 2023–2024 financial year alone, the total police budget amounted to $5.3 billion.

Since the commencement of the PULSE program, the NSW Police Force had spent approximately $16.3 million of its five-year $79 million PULSE funding allocation. The combined spend on proactive wellbeing services was $34 million. This $34 million total combines expenditure on non-PULSE wellbeing services such as police psychologists and the Employee Assistance Program. It is too early to tell whether PULSE and other police wellbeing initiatives are effective in addressing risks and maximising workforce retention.

The focus of PULSE is to assist police after traumatic workplace experiences and provide early intervention support for police who are starting to show signs of stress. It includes funding for mental health clinicians, the reimbursement of police who access private psychologist sessions, and funding for the RECON program to assist with injury prevention and rehabilitation.

PULSE-funded programs are not designed to minimise the psychological risks of work pressure, stress or fatigue. Some of these factors are cited as reasons for psychological injury in workers compensation claims.

In general, police in metropolitan stations and those in large regional areas have regular access to mental health clinicians, and timely in-person incident support teams after adverse incidents. The most well received initiatives have been those that provide in-person support to police employees. These include mental health clinicians based in police area commands and districts, and in-person incident support personnel. Incident support personnel can be requested by a commander following staff exposure to traumatic events.

The NSW Police Force has professional development programs on mental health, wellbeing support, and people management, but access can be limited due to competing work priorities

The NSW Police Force has developed an extensive suite of professional development materials aimed at supporting police wellbeing. The majority of these are online training resources and are focused on self-management of mental health and wellbeing. While there are a variety of online resources and services, frontline police interviewed for this audit advise that they do not always read emails and that they lack time to source online training options through the Health Safety and Wellbeing Command intranet. To date, there has been no evaluation of these resources to assess their effectiveness or impact on workforce wellbeing.

The NSW Police Force has training workshops such as the ‘your health first’ program that is delivered on-site at some commands. Other wellbeing-related training modules are available to all staff via the online learning management system. However, staff shortages have meant that there are limited opportunities for general duties police to be released for non-mandatory training courses. This has reduced the ability of frontline police to access professional development programs that are essential for their progression and promotion opportunities.

Police managers from the Learning Development and Delivery Command advise that human resources and people management training programs are available and tailored to each rank from senior constable upwards. Programs focus on performance management, conflict resolution, and team feedback delivery skills. These training packages are not mandatory for all staff at these ranks.

Mental health clinicians provide in-person support to police after traumatic events, and while anecdotally well-received, an evaluation is needed to inform future investment in the program

In 2023, mental health clinicians were introduced into police commands through the PULSE funded initiatives. They provide face-to-face services to police after adverse or traumatic incidents. Clinicians also play a role in monitoring police wellbeing and assessing whether police need additional support. They do this through periodic visits to police stations and informal interactions with the workforce. The police interviewed for this audit advise that clinicians have made valuable contributions in assisting them to remain psychologically healthy in the workplace. Police told audit staff that they value the formal and informal interactions with clinicians, and the ability to talk face-to-face with a qualified clinician. They advise that it is highly beneficial to be able to debrief with a professional at a relatively proximate time to a difficult incident or traumatic event.

The mental health clinicians interviewed for this audit advise that in-person support is the optimal form of support, as clinicians are able to gain additional information through observation of police after traumatic experiences. Body language can be a significant indicator of the impacts of traumatic workplace incidents. The presence of clinicians in police stations allows them to visually monitor police over time.

In 2023 and 2024, the NSW Police Force was not able to fully recruit to fill all mental health clinician positions. By 2025, all 28 funded positions were filled. Clinicians have responsibilities to support frontline police across the 57 area commands and 432 police stations. They also have responsibility to support police in specialist commands. This means that each clinician provides services across three separate commands. Regional mental health clinicians provide services to around 650 staff in some regions and travel up to 850 kilometres per week. Some clinicians travel up to four hours per day to provide services at police stations in their designated commands. This means that while the mental health clinicians have been well received by frontline police, they are not always available at smaller stations for immediate support or triage.

The NSW Police Force has not completed a quality-based assessment or evaluation of the efficiency or effectiveness of the mental health clinicians to date.

Most police interviewed for this audit reported poor experiences with the Employee Assistance Program (EAP), and the program has not been formally evaluated

The Employee Assistance Program (EAP) phone service is routinely available to all police, including frontline police in rural and remote locations. This service is rationed to six sessions every two years.

The frontline police interviewed for this audit were consistent in their criticism of the quality of the EAP provider, with most describing it as doing ‘more harm than good’. Most of the police interviewed, reported that the EAP provider does not deliver a professional, suitable, or accessible service.

Police describe EAP practitioners as ‘inexperienced’ and ‘poorly prepared to provide the complex services required by police’. Most police interviewed for this audit compared the service provided by the EAP to an ‘operator-assisted checklist’ exercise.

After a traumatic incident, police can receive a call from the EAP provider. These calls are initially made to establish appointment times. However, audit staff were told that they often wake police after long shifts, just as they are trying to sleep. Police advise that EAP phone calls would be better organised through an app or a text message.

The NSW Police Force has not conducted an evaluation of the quality or outcomes of the EAP services for police. Given that frontline police operate in unpredictable circumstances, attending road fatalities and other traumatic and violent events, there is a need to ensure that high-quality and effective support options are available for all police when required.

Police in high-risk roles with exposure to traumatic content must attend mandatory sessions with internal psychologists, and early evaluations show it is effective in strengthening resilience

The NSW Police Force provides mandatory psychological support for police who work in specific specialist roles that are deemed to have high-risk exposure to traumatic materials or events. This support is provided through a program known as WellCheck. The WellCheck program comprises regular one-on-one sessions between police employees and a police psychologist. In general, police are required to attend between one and four WellCheck sessions every 12 months. This program is routinely available to police who work in specialist units such as the sex crimes squad, the homicide squad and the forensics unit.

The purpose of the WellCheck program is to increase the employee’s awareness of early symptoms of psychological injury. In addition, the sessions provide the psychologist with ongoing observation of each police employee, with opportunities to observe any changes over time. Psychologists are able to identify emerging psychological problems and provide support or referral to other mental health services if required.

Some police who were interviewed for this audit raised concerns about the criteria for accessing the WellCheck program. They advised that if they move from a ‘high-risk role’ to another policing role, they are not eligible for routine, ongoing WellCheck sessions. They advised that the effects of post-traumatic stress or trauma can remain after they have been transferred, and trauma can be carried into the new role. General duties police are not eligible for WellCheck sessions on a routine basis. They are able to self-refer to an internal police psychologist if they identify an emerging problem.

Evaluations of the WellCheck program are generally positive. However, at the time of this audit, less than ten per cent of the workforce were part of the mandatory WellCheck program. This is despite the fact that a 2018 national survey of emergency service responders found that 73% of this workforce report exposure to stressful events.

The evaluation of the WellCheck program found that there was merit in continuing the program, and reported that it ‘would be beneficial to all staff in the organisation, particularly general duties officers who may be exposed to multiple distressing events in any given day’.

 

7. Psychological costs to individuals and the State

Complaints and legal claims relating to alleged police misconduct are costly to the State

Frontline police are more likely to be recipients of public complaints than other police as they have more interaction with the public during events such as domestic violence incidents, assaults, neighbourhood disputes, mental health incidents, and other crime responses. Specialist police such as detectives and forensic experts have less interaction with the public and therefore receive fewer public complaints.

Frontline police told audit staff that complaints against them have significant impacts on their wellbeing. These negative impacts are compounded by the fact that police are not told about the nature of the complaint against them or the name of the complainant. For many police, this process seems unjust as in some instances, they have no information about what they have done to receive the complaint, and no recourse to defend their case.

Public complaints about police are handled differently across the six police regions. In one region, the region commander has determined that police will not be informed about complaints that are shown to be vexatious and declined. This is to ensure that morale is not affected. In another region, all complaints are reported to police, even if they are declined. Some police argue that declined complaints should not be recorded on their files, as is the current practice. They advise that complaints can have an adverse impact on their promotion eligibility, even when the complaints are vexatious.

Police told us that there was an inadequate level of wellbeing support available for officers who were subject to complaints or investigations. Complaint and investigation policies and procedures make mention of the availability of Employee Assistance Program services, but this is the only external support. According to the policy, local commanders are responsible for monitoring the welfare of complaint recipients and all other people involved. Procedure documents do not include any requirement for commanders to refer police to wellbeing support services.

During the five years from 2019–2020 to 2024–2025, a total of 2,124 legal claims were made against NSW police employees for misconduct matters. The NSW Police Force paid $155.44 million to settle these claims over the five-year period. Despite the significant cost of these claims, the NSW Police Force does not report basic information about these legal matters. The NSW Police Force does not report on the number of claims that were settled via payments to claimants, the number of claims that proceeded to Court, or the claims that were successfully defended in Court.

Since 2019–2020, there have been increases in psychological injury claim numbers and costs across the NSW public sector, for police these costs have risen by almost 50% year on year

Despite increases in mental health services and psychological support for police, the costs of psychological injuries have been increasing year on year. While compensation claims for physical injuries occur at more than twice the rate of psychological injury claims, the costs associated with psychological injury claims are higher than for physical injuries. Compensation costs to psychologically injured police totalled approximately $1.75 billion from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024. The NSW Police Force is not alone in experiencing increases in psychological injuries and costs, higher claim numbers and costs are also evident in other NSW government agencies.

Police compensation costs were covered by two different insurance schemes during the five years from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024. The icare workers compensation insurance scheme covered costs of $927.84 million, and the Police Blue Ribbon Insurance Scheme covered $817.29 million in costs. The Police Blue Ribbon Insurance Scheme was managed by a private insurer.

From 2019–2020 to 2023–2024, NSW police employees made approximately 3,080 compensation claims for physical injuries each year, compared to a yearly average of 1,100 claims for psychological injuries. Over this timeframe, psychological claims accounted for 74% of the total compensation claims costs, with physical injuries accounting for 26% of costs.

Exhibit 6 shows the number of physical and psychological compensation claims numbers each year, and the claim costs for the different injury types by year.

Combination line and column graph tracking psychological and physical injury claims numbers and costs, over the past five financial years. Psychological injury claims and costs are tracking upward each year, whereas physical injury claims and costs remain stable.
Exhibit 6: Workers compensation claims numbers and claims costs ($millions) by physical and psychological injuries, per year, financial years 2019 to 2024

Source: Audit Office analysis of icare workers compensation dataset provided by NSW Police Force.

There are three phases in the workers compensation claim process. The first phase occurs directly after a NSW Police employee sustains an injury. This phase lasts up to six months. Over this period, the costs of salary benefits, medical expenses, legal costs, and administration are covered by icare, the State government workers compensation insurer. Some police recover from their injuries in the first six months, and they can return to work. However, in 2024, 66% of NSW Police employees did not recover from their psychological injuries within the six-month timeframe. In the five years from 2019–2020 to 2023–2024, the claim costs paid by icare in the first six months of police psychological injuries, totalled approximately $927.84 million.

The second phase covers a three-month period when the NSW Police Force covers the salaries of injured workers for an additional ‘top up’ of three months. It is hoped that during this period, the employee may still be able to return to work. The cost of this to police over the five years was $89.76 million.

The third phase of psychological injury compensation occurs nine months after injury. At this point, injured police are eligible to make a claim to permanently leave the NSW Police Force on medical grounds. This claim may be approved after full medical assessment and investigation. Up until October 2024, the cost of this medical separation was covered by the Police Blue Ribbon Insurance Scheme. This Scheme has now been superseded. However, when it was in operation, the Scheme offered police a monthly income protection benefit that lasted up to seven years, in addition to a total and permanent disability lump sum payout.

Over the period from January 2020 to June 2024, the Police Blue Ribbon Insurance Scheme paid a total of $247.62 million in income protection payments to police employees, and $669.68 million in total and permanent disability lump sum payments to police who medically separated from the NSW Police Force.

Under the Police Blue Ribbon Insurance Scheme, police employees paid 1.8% of their salaries towards injury insurances. In addition, the NSW Police Force paid an annual premium to the private insurer (TAL) to cover injury costs.

In October 2024, the NSW Police Force made changes to its workers compensation scheme and introduced the Enhanced Police Support Scheme to replace the Police Blue Ribbon Insurance Scheme. The new Scheme has removed the entitlement for injured police to claim for a total and permanent disability payout, but has extended the eligibility of income protection payments by an additional three years. The NSW Police Force advises that the objective of the new Scheme is to focus on police recovery and return to work outcomes, which will result in reduced costs in the future.

 

Appendices

Appendix 1 – Response from entity

Appendix 2 – About the audit

Appendix 3 – Performance auditing

 

© Copyright reserved by the Audit Office of New South Wales. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without prior consent of the Audit Office of New South Wales. The Audit Office does not accept responsibility for loss or damage suffered by any person acting on or refraining from action as a result of any of this material.

 

Parliamentary reference - Report number #408 - released 11 June 2025