|
|
The focus of our audit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our 2003 ‘Protecting our rivers’ audit
examined whether the water quality of New South Wales rivers was efficiently
and effectively protected against unacceptable levels of pollution. In this
follow up audit we examined whether there had been progress in addressing the
recommendations of our 2003 audit. We also examined whether a monitoring
system had been established to measure river health and water quality of NSW
rivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By the time of our audit in 2003,
agencies had been taking action to reduce the quantity of pollutants reaching
rivers for more than 20 years. They considered that their actions had been
effective. But they could not measure the effectiveness of their actions in
every river system, as they had not established a comprehensive monitoring
system to measure water quality or river health.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our 2003 audit found there were
significant gaps in the monitoring and evaluation of water quality. It was
not possible, using the information available, to gauge the health of all rivers,
the main risks to rivers or strategies for managing those risks. We also
considered that the existing arrangements for managing water quality lacked
the structure to ensure success. There was no lead entity to coordinate
efforts to protect river water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recommended that the Government
establish a lead entity with an appropriate governance structure and
resources for implementing the State’s objectives for water quality. The lead
entity should develop:
§
a framework for coordinated management of
rivers
§
a State river health and water quality
strategy including a monitoring system for river water quality
§
a plan to limit and reduce pollution in
rivers, particularly diffuse source pollution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also recommended that the Government
establish an independent environmental audit of river water quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit opinion
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the time of our 2003 audit agencies
were unable to measure the water quality in NSW rivers as they had not
established a comprehensive and ongoing monitoring system for water quality.
Agencies are now developing a monitoring system to measure the progress against
the State Plan 2006 target to improve the condition of riverine ecosystems by
2015. It may not be possible to identify an overall trend in the condition of
riverine ecosystems by the State Plan target date of 2015. This is because riverine
ecosystems do not respond rapidly to change in the environment. A long period
of time is required to collect sufficient data to establish a baseline for
all indicators being used and to determine trends, particularly given the
prolonged drought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The State Plan 2006 river ecosystems target
to improve the condition of riverine ecosystems by 2015 will provide a
clearer basis for agency accountability than the previous guidelines on
selection of water quality and river flow objectives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agencies are now implementing the
recommendations of our 2003 audit as part of their program to achieve the
State Plan 2006 target for the condition of riverine ecosystems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Government has appointed a lead
entity, the Natural Resources and Environment CEOs Cluster Group (NR&E CEO
Cluster Group) to coordinate achieving the 13 natural resource targets in the
State Plan 2006, including the target for the condition of riverine
ecosystems. The NR&E CEO Cluster Group is striving to achieve this target.
In our view the NR&E CEO Cluster Group lacks the governance structure and
resources for the long program required as it has no direct funding and
cannot direct agency priorities. However, the agencies advise that the NR&E
CEO Cluster Group is responsible to the Premier for achieving the natural
resources targets. The CEOs on the NR&E CEO Cluster Group will agree on
allocation of tasks to agencies and the individual CEOs can negotiate
priorities and budget allocations for their tasks within their own agencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Government responded to our 2003 audit recommendation to establish an
independent environmental audit of river water quality. In late 2003 it
established the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) to undertake independent
audits of natural resources. The NRC is currently required to report against
the 13 statewide natural resources targets in the State Plan 2006. The NRC
has legislative capacity to undertake audits of other natural resource
management plans and issues, as required by the Minister. We believe that the
NRC would be an appropriate entity to undertake such reviews.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Audit Findings
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter
1:
Measuring river health and water quality
|
Can
NSW agencies now measure whether there has been an improvement in the river
health and water quality of NSW rivers?
|
|
|
|
Agencies
are establishing a monitoring system for the State Plan 2006 target: ‘By 2015
there is an improvement in the condition of riverine ecosystems’. This target
is a further development from the water quality and river flow objectives
that applied at the time of our 2003 audit. The monitoring system will
measure trends in the condition of river ecosystems, initially using fish, macroinvertebrates
and hydrology indicators. The condition of riverine ecosystems indicates the
overall condition and health of the river.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
approach of monitoring the condition of riverine ecosystems to indicate river
health was developed for the Murray Darling Basin Commission’s Sustainable
Rivers Audit of rivers in the Murray Darling Basin, which commenced in 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NSW agencies have implemented the
Sustainable Rivers Audit approach within the river valleys of the Murray Darling Basin. They have commenced a program of monitoring the State’s coastal
rivers using the same methodology. Additional indicators of river health are
being developed to add to the Sustainable Rivers Audit approach – riverine
vegetation and river physical form. They are also implementing a new water
quality monitoring program that will eventually provide a statewide coverage
for turbidity, nutrients and salinity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is not yet clear how long it will take
to demonstrate valid trends in the overall condition of riverine ecosystems. Riverine
ecosystems do not respond rapidly to change in the environment and are
affected by variability of climate, such as the severe drought since 2001.
Agencies expect to take until about 2012 to effectively establish a
meaningful baseline for indicators being used for assessing river health, and
then further time for monitoring and analysis to establish the trend.
Monitoring that is underway is expected to present a snapshot of the current
condition of river systems across NSW and for each Catchment Management
Authority area by the end of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 2:
Progress in addressing the recommendations of the 2003 audit
|
Has there been progress in addressing the recommendations of the
2003 audit?
|
|
|
We made a number of recommendations in
our 2003 audit to improve the protection of water quality of NSW rivers. The
Government and the agencies are now implementing our 2003 audit
recommendations as part of the program to achieve the State Plan 2006 target
to improve the condition of riverine ecosystems by 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2003
recommendations (in bold) and our findings on the actions being taken to
implement them are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recommended that the Government establish
a lead entity to implement the State’s objectives for river health and water
quality.
The Department
of Environment and Climate Change has overall responsibility for leading the
response on Priority E4 of the State Plan 2006 and reporting on progress. Priority
E4 contains 13 State Plan natural resource targets, including the target to
improve the condition of riverine ecosystems by 2015. The Natural Resources
and Environment CEOs Cluster (NR&E CEO Cluster Group) is lead
entity/coordinator for all 13 natural resources targets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
and that the lead entity:
§
develop a framework for coordinated management
of river health and water quality
The Water
CEOs Group (now replaced by the NR&E CEO Cluster Group) agreed to a draft
framework document that broadly describes the responsibilities of agencies
involved in managing river health and water quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
§ develop a strategy to define the role of
the water quality objectives, call for a formal risk assessment of rivers and
strengthen systems for water quality monitoring
-
the State Plan 2006 target includes a target for
the condition of riverine ecosystems and guidelines have been issued to
define the role of the water quality objectives
-
no formal risk assessment of NSW rivers has
been undertaken since 1997
-
the agencies are developing a comprehensive
statewide monitoring system for the State Plan 2006 target for river health that
they expect to be fully operational in 2008-09. Valid trends may not be evident
in all indicators by 2015 – the State Plan 2006 target date to achieve
improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
§
develop a plan for pollution, particularly
diffuse source pollution.
The agencies
have advised that diffuse source pollution is the main source of pollution to
rivers remaining to be addressed. The lead entity has prepared a statewide
draft plan to limit and reduce diffuse source pollution from priority sources
across NSW catchments as part of the program to achieve the State Plan 2006
target for the condition of riverine ecosystems. This plan will build upon
existing programs and will initiate and coordinate new management actions
across the State. There has also been significant action to address urban
stormwater management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
also recommended that the Government establish an independent environmental
review of river health and water quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our 2003 audit noted that no entity
regularly audited river water quality. In late 2003 the Government
established the Natural Resources Commission (NRC). The NRC currently audits the
effectiveness of the Catchment Management Authorities’ implementation of
their catchment action plans. It has been tasked with reporting against the
13 statewide natural resources targets in the State Plan 2006. The NRC has
legislative capacity to undertake audits of other natural resource management
plans and issues, as required by the Minister. We believe that the NRC would
be an appropriate entity to undertake such reviews.
|
|
|
Response from the Department of Environment and
Climate Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the opportunity to
provide a formal response to the Follow up of the 2003 Performance Audit
‘Protecting our rivers’.
As you would be aware the Department
of Environment and Climate Change (DECC) has worked closely with the
Auditor-General’s Office as they prepared this report. We believe the report
is now a fair and reasonable account of the general issues involved in
managing and monitoring river health and water quality in NSW.
However, it has been difficult to
reflect the full extent of the governance changes and technical challenges
faced by Government agencies since the 2003 Audit. Soon after the 2003 Audit
the Government introduced substantial reforms to natural resource management
in NSW, which included the establishment of the Natural Resources Commission
(NRC) and the establishment of Catchment Management Authorities (CMAs). The
NRC was charged with developing standards and targets for natural resources
management (including the target for riverine health) for Government’s
consideration and auditing the Catchment Action Plans developed by the CMAs.
Considerable effort (time and resources) by relevant Departments went into assisting
the NRC develop the statewide standard and targets throughout 2004-05.
Following this stage there was an
intensive effort from relevant agencies to develop a NSW Natural Resources
Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Strategy to support the implementation
of the natural resource standard and targets for both agencies and CMAs. The
strategy represents the first time that such a comprehensive, statewide
monitoring strategy has been developed across all natural resource agencies
and put in place. This is the result of some three years of work undertaken
by several departments with the NRC to develop the strategy, through the
early developmental stages, consultation and refinement of methodologies and
analytical methods. Implementation of the strategy will involve a massive
amount of data collection and analysis by the participating agencies for
years to come.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit report correctly points out
that some of the indicators and measures adopted in the monitoring strategy
will take some years to develop an adequate data base to be able to
understand the baseline condition and then some further time to get a
meaningful picture of trends. In the case of the riverine health target the
Government is better placed than for some other targets as it put in place
community agreed water quality objectives for each river valley in 1998.
These objectives provide a benchmark for measurement of river condition
against desired environmental values and these can be measured in a
quantitative sense through the application of the ANZECC/ARMCANZ Guidelines
for Fresh and Marine Water Quality published in 2000. The roll out of the
Monitoring and Evaluation Strategy will build on this part of the NSW water
reforms and provide a consistent and rigorous monitoring program into the
future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, for the first time the
Government will have a NSW Strategy for Diffuse Source Water Pollution which
has also involved considerable time and effort to research and develop a
methodology for setting priorities and brokering agreed projects and
partnerships across agencies, local councils and CMAs. This project should
provide a framework for addressing this very complex and widespread problem
in a far more focussed and coordinated way than has been attempted in the
past.
The Department agrees that an
independent environmental review of river health and water quality is
desirable, and that the NRC is well placed to do so.
We thank you and your staff for the
opportunity to contribute to this follow up Audit, in particular for the time
necessary to explain the new arrangements and detailed concepts involved in
the management of river health in New South Wales.
(signed)
Lisa Corbyn
Director
General
Dated: 29
April 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Response from
the Department of Water and Energy
|
|
|
|
|
|
I refer to your letter of 1 April 2008 concerning The Audit
Office’s final report on the follow-up performance audit ‘Protecting our
Rivers’, and I thank you for the opportunity
to provide a formal response.
As you
know, the Department of Water and Energy (DWE) has devoted a significant
amount of time and effort to assist the Auditor-General’s Office in preparing
this report. We believe the report now reflects much better the current
natural resources directions that the Government has implemented in an effort
to tackle the complexities of river health and water management, rather than
just the water quality component. This has been borne out not only by the
Government’s decision to establish targets for river health within its State
Plan 2006, but also recent Australian Government initiatives within the
Murray Darling Basin.
The report
appropriately recognises that state agencies and Catchment Management
Authorities have made significant progress since the original audit in 2003.
The DWE agrees that more needs to be done, in particular to derive the
necessary baselines for monitoring and reporting against the state targets,
but also to ensure ongoing assessment of our progress towards these targets.
The
creation of DWE as a Division of Government in April 2007, places the
Department in a position to lend strong and effective support into the future
to ensure that sufficient information is available for government to measure
its performance against its agreed targets for river health. The DWE is working
collaboratively with both the Department of Environment and Climate Change
and Department of Primary Industries to ensure this is achieved.
(signed)
Mark Duffy
Director-General
Dated: 29 April 2008
|