|
|
The focus of our audit
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Department of Primary Industries (DPI)
aims to foster profitable and sustainable development of primary industries. One
significant way it works to achieve this is through assisting agricultural
industries to use water more efficiently and productively. While DPI offers
advice and support to farmers on how to grow crops, it is not its role to tell
them what they must grow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similarly, in conducting this audit it is
not our role to decide whether or not certain crops should be grown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The audit examines the effectiveness of DPI
in assisting farmers to adopt on-farm improvements in irrigation water use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This report answers the following
questions:
§
does the Department of Primary Industries have
effective approaches for improving the efficiency of water use on irrigation
farms?
§
have the expected outcomes of the Department’s
initiatives for improving agricultural water use efficiency been achieved?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 70 per cent of water extracted in
NSW is used in irrigated agriculture. While accounting for less than one per
cent of total agricultural area, irrigation contributes more than half of the
profit earned by agriculture in NSW.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2006 NSW State Plan has a goal for
improving the efficiency of water use. Underlying documents include objectives
for DPI on adoption of water-efficient technologies. The State Plan also has a
goal for stronger rural and regional economies, with DPI responsible for
expanding its training programs, including those for water efficiency
improvement in rural and regional areas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI is also responsible for leading the
development of a regional innovation plan which relates to the NSW
Government’s Statement on Innovation. This plan will have a strong emphasis
on improving productivity and is expected to encompass future water use
efficiency initiatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian governments have agreed that
action is required to more efficiently allocate water among competing uses. The
recently-announced National Plan for Water Security will place further demands
on the irrigated farm sector to adjust water management practices. Through
its research and development (R&D) activities and its programs to build
the skills and capacity of farmers, DPI has employed a twofold strategy to
achieve this: development of science-based practices to improve efficiency of
water use, and initiatives to assist irrigators to adopt them.
|
|
|
|
|
Science-based solutions
|
DPI works extensively with agricultural
industries and research organisations to develop improved management methods and
irrigation technologies. Its R&D initiatives include techniques for
identifying ‘leaky’ soils, breeding of cold tolerant rice varieties to reduce
water requirements, and innovations which have improved water use efficiency
in grapegrowing by 50 per cent. DPI attracts nearly half of its research
funding from its external partners.
|
|
|
|
|
Key
initiatives to ensure change
|
Central to DPI’s strategy for the
adoption of these improved water use practices and technologies was the
WaterWise on the Farm education and training program. WaterWise provided
grower awareness, education and training, advice and support for farmers to
change the way they manage water on-farm. This included planning assistance
to move from older methods such as flood and furrow irrigation to potentially
more efficient methods such as drip irrigation. It also included techniques
for minimising water losses and for scheduling of irrigation to deliver water
in the ‘right amount, right place and right time’.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The NSW Government provided $7 million between
1996 and 2005 for DPI’s WaterWise program to educate and train irrigators in efficiency
improvements. Between 1998 and 2005 WaterWise was also supported by $25
million in incentive funding to encourage irrigators to participate in the
program and adopt improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Around 5,000 of the state’s 12,000
irrigators attended WaterWise courses. DPI evaluations show a high rate of
adoption of improvements by farmers, and numerous case studies show
improvements in water use efficiency across cotton, rice, wine grapes and
vegetables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WaterWise funding ceased in June 2005.
Although DPI still delivers the WaterWise course under its PROfarm training
initiative, the number of staff engaged in WaterWise and similar programs has
reduced. Farmers also believe that DPI has lost many staff in recent years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit opinion
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI has a crucial role in assisting the
irrigation industry to respond to the conflicting demands placed upon the
state’s water resources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The State Plan emphasises the importance
of water to agriculture, and gives DPI responsibility to use its training
programs to help farmers continue to increase water use efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
However the National Plan for Water
Security and the National Water Initiative (NWI) require that water be
provided for the environment. This has increased the
need for DPI to assist farmers to adjust to reduced availability of water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water use efficiency investments produce
a mix of benefits for growers and benefits for the public and the community. DPI’s
strategy of working with agriculture industry bodies therefore has the
potential to facilitate more efficient investment in R&D by providing a
framework for industry and government to fund projects in accordance with the
industry and public benefits they generate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Representatives from DPI’s partner
research organisations praised the constructive relationships which they
share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
While DPI has developed project funding
principles to assist in determining the appropriate mix of industry and government
funding, it is appropriate that these continue to be improved. This should
involve DPI working closely with key stakeholders, such as NSW Treasury, to
make its approach increasingly transparent and to ensure opportunities for
innovative approaches to water use efficiency continue to be developed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI’s WaterWise on the Farm education and
training program was effective in increasing awareness of water use
efficiency practices and technologies, in educating and training irrigators
in farm water resources planning and management, and in encouraging them to
change practices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI needs to work closely with agencies
with which it shares responsibilities in the State Plan to ensure that its
water use efficiency activities contribute to the State Plan goals. It needs
to work closely with Treasury to document the services it will require to do
this, the resources which will be needed, and how its success will be
measured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will ensure that DPI is well placed
to continue to assist the NSW farming industry to adapt and survive periods
of reduced water availability. It will keep as many farmers as possible in
business and so preserve rural and regional communities which depend heavily
on agriculture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key audit
findings
|
|
|
|
|
Does
the Department of Primary Industries have effective approaches for improving
the efficiency of use of water in irrigation on-farm?
|
DPI has developed a number of effective
approaches to improve efficiency of water use in irrigation.
|
|
|
|
DPI has sufficient information on the
main uses of water to identify priorities. It has developed close
partnerships with industry research organisations and community bodies to
identify opportunities for improving water use practices and technologies. It
has attracted investment by agriculture bodies in R&D projects helping
irrigators to adapt to reduced availability of water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programs such as WaterWise on the Farm were
effective in increasing grower awareness of water use efficiency options and
technologies and in educating and training irrigators in farm water resources
planning and management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
But DPI has been unable to fully maintain
programs such as WaterWise as Government funding has ceased.
|
|
|
|
|
Have the expected outcomes of the Department’s initiatives for
improving efficiency of agricultural water use been achieved?
|
DPI has contributed significantly to
developing improved irrigation practices and having them widely adopted. But
there is still more that can be done.
|
|
|
|
WaterWise delivered benefits of around
$88 million on an investment of $20 million by accelerating adoption of improved
irrigation practices and technologies. It also delivered direct public
benefits in the order of $160 to $240 million through water savings to the
environment. Other benefits were reduced stream and ground water salinity and
increased community capacity to respond to future challenges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI is responsible under the State Plan
for expanding training and for reporting on the adoption of on-farm
technologies that improve water use efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI’s achievements have depended on its
R&D partnerships and on programs such as WaterWise to encourage and
facilitate the adoption of improvements. To ensure that DPI’s research,
education and training activities maximise benefits to the community its
criteria and processes for selecting R&D projects need to be made
increasingly transparent to both stakeholders and clients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI also needs to improve inter-agency
planning with NSW Treasury to enable the efficient implementation of such
programs in future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI should work closely with agencies
with which it shares responsibilities to ensure that its water use efficiency
activities contribute to the State Plan goals (page 34).
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI and its key stakeholders should maintain
their close relationships to ensure that they identify opportunities for new technologies
and practices with the highest potential benefit (page 34).
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI should further develop the
transparency of its R&D selection principles to demonstrate that projects
and activities are funded in accordance with the mix of industry and public
benefits they will generate (page 34).
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI should negotiate with NSW Treasury
the resources it will require to meet its commitments to the State Plan, the
future demands of the Commonwealth (including the NWI) and the effects of
climate change. In doing so it should review best practice models in other
jurisdictions for assisting and encouraging growers to adopt improvements
(page 34).
|
|
|
Response from
the Department of Primary Industries
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am writing in response to your
invitation of 23 October 2007 for me to provide a formal response to your
final report which will be incorporated verbatim into the published report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to accept your invitation
and therefore provide the attached response for inclusion in your final
report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to take this opportunity
to thank you and your staff for the constructive manner in which this
performance audit was undertaken and the helpful recommendations that have
resulted.
(signed)
B D BUFFIER
DIRECTOR-GENERAL
Date: 2 November 2007
|
|
|
|
|
ATTACHMENT
|
Thank you for providing the Department
of Primary Industries (DPI) with the opportunity to comment on the findings
and recommendations of the performance audit report Improving efficiency of irrigation water use on farms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The report confirms the importance of
DPI’s role in working with irrigated industries in NSW to cope with
dramatically reduced water supplies. Irrigated agriculture underpins many of
our rural communities, injecting many millions of dollars into regional
economies and providing crucial employment opportunities. DPI’s role in
working with industry to enhance its water use efficiency therefore provides
far reaching social benefits to the broader NSW community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a tendency to negatively
portray agriculture as a major low value user of the state’s water resources.
The more appropriate representation of the situation is that cities, towns
and the environment are generally given priority access to water, with much
of the residual amounts flowing to agriculture as it provides the next most
profitable use of the resource.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This perspective highlights the
importance of irrigated agriculture as the industry most capable of generating
substantial direct and indirect benefits from the state’s remaining water
resources. Indeed the ability to trade water means that it will be allocated
to its best use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The report identifies that an
important part of DPI’s core business is to work with rural industries and
other stakeholders in NSW to develop and increase the adoption of land use
systems and practices that are both profitable and environmentally
sustainable. The report also confirms that DPI’s strategy of doing this
through (i) its R&D partnerships to develop technologies and practices to
improve water use efficiency, and (ii) through its education and training
activities which encourage and assist irrigators to adopt them, have not only
been effective, but will be fundamentally important in addressing the state’s
future water use challenges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key audit findings are that DPI
has developed effective approaches to improve the efficiency of water use in
irrigation and that DPI has contributed significantly to developing improved
irrigation practices and having them widely adopted. Nevertheless, the Audit
Office has made a number of helpful suggestions as to how DPI can further
enhance its role in these areas. I welcome those suggestions and take the
opportunity to thank the AO team for the constructive and helpful manner in
which they undertook this important performance audit. I would also like
to thank those DPI staff who assisted with the audit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
|
The report’s recommendations will
enhance DPI’s future capacity to help irrigators respond to drought and
reduced water availability. I have made specific comments on the three
key recommendations.
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendation 1
|
DPI should work closely with agencies
with which it shares responsibilities to ensure that its water use efficiency
activities contribute to the State Plan goals.
|
|
|
|
|
DPI
comment
|
In the State Plan, DPI shares
responsibility with the Department of Water and Energy for reporting on water
use efficiency training programs and on the adoption of on-farm technologies
to improve water use efficiency. With the Department of Education and
Training it shares responsibility for expanding the provision of relevant
training in rural and regional areas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
These shared responsibilities will be
reflected in future versions of DPI’s Corporate Plan and its Results and
Services Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendation
2
|
DPI and its key stakeholders should
maintain their close relationships to ensure that they identify opportunities
for new technologies and practices with the highest potential benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI should further develop the
transparency of its R&D selection principles to demonstrate that projects
and activities are funded in accordance with the mix of industry and public
benefits they will generate.
|
|
|
|
|
DPI
comment
|
The Audit Office’s findings and
recommendations provide strong support for DPI continuing to work in
partnership with key stakeholders, such as industry based R&D
corporations, to ensure that the full range of research opportunities to
increase water use efficiency are fully explored and to ensure industry and
public funds are used in a manner that maximises the development of new
technologies and practices. The Catchment Management Authorities are also key
partners in this process, given the significant Catchment level natural
resource management benefits of these activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DPI has been successful in developing
jointly funded projects with a mix of ‘public’ and ‘industry’ benefit
outcomes, and consequently, the Department’s research division attracts
significant partnership funding from industry. DPI will commit to maintaining
this partnership approach and to further developing our investment guidelines
to ensure projects are funded in accordance with the industry and public
benefits they generate.
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendation
3
|
DPI should negotiate with NSW Treasury
the resources it will require to meet its commitments to the State Plan, the
future demands of the Commonwealth (including the NWI) and the effects of
climate change. In doing so it should review best practice models in other
jurisdictions for assisting and encouraging growers to adopt improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
DPI
comment
|
DPI’s Results and Services Plan is the
main vehicle by which this will be achieved and DPI has been, and will
continue to, liaise closely with Treasury in demonstrating the benefits of
its activities. The review of best practice models in other jurisdictions for
assisting and encouraging growers to adopt improvements will be undertaken by
DPI in 2008.
|
|
|
|